Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Gold Technology
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Nichromet Cyanide-Free
Gold Extraction Technology
A green alternative to
the classical cyanide
approach
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Vision
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Overview of the Process
Sulphides Controlled
Oxidation SulfuricAcid
Ores
Acid BaseMetals
Leaching
Halogens
PreciousMetals
Treatment
InertTailings
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Nichromet Process Flowsheet
Copper Oxidation
Removal
To Atm
Pre-Treatment
Concentrate
Copper
Extraction
Arsenic
SO2
Scrubber
Scrubber
Oxidation
Fluidized Bed
Gypsum
Iron
Precipitation
Concentrated
Brine
Holding Tank Polished
Chlorination
Brine
Reactor
Holding Tank
Hypohalides
Holding Tank
Deaeration Reverse
Tank Osmosis
Electrolysis
Cell
Ca(OH)2
Hematite Na2CO3
Larox filter
Tailings Iron
Precipitator
Calcium
Copper Precipitator
Cementation
Carbon In Polishing
Pregnant Filtration
Column Carbon to
Brine
Holding Gold
Tank Recovery # DE DESSIN
Iron TITRE
Removal
Sector 00 : General Flowsheet
REALISE PAR PAGE
David Lemieux 1 SUR 1
Blister
Copper DATE DE MODIFICATION
2013-02-12
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Advantages Over
Cyanide
Faster Reaction Time
Process time of few hours instead of few
days
Legal issues
Cyanidation has been banned in many
countries and some States in USA
(ex:Wisconsin)
Extraction of silver and PGM if present
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Environmental
Advantages
No cyanide
No tailings pond (elimination of spillage
hazard)
No liquid effluent
Solids residues devoided of sulphides and base
metals
No acidic lixiviate or contaminants from tailings
site
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Characteristics of the
Nichromet Technology
Flexible
Fast
Can handle base metals
Leaching time of 2 hours (bulk flotation : higher
instead of 2 days for cyanide efficiency)
Can treat carbonaceous
ore
Green Can handle telluride
Cyanide-free process contamination
Sulfide is recycled as sulfuric
acid Profitable
No waste water, no tailing Process cost ($/oz gold)
pond and no air pollutants similar to cyanide
Solid wastes : inert and Capital cost lower (10-15%)
stable, even when using high than cyanide
arsenic ores
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Successfully piloted at the ton scale
on a wide range of materials
Barren
Grade
Sources Type Solid Yield (%)
(g/T)
(g/T)
1: Canada Ore 2,58 g/T 0,07 g/T 97,5 %
(Quebec)
2: Canada Ore 3,45 g/T 0,34 g/T 93,2 %
(Quebec)
3: Canada Ore 13,9 g/T 0,79 g/T 95,4 %
(Quebec)
4: Canada Conc. 55,3 g/T 4,79 g/T 94,0 %
(Ontario)*
5 : Eastern Conc. 7,5 g/T 1,48 g/T 91,0 %
Europe*
6: Canada Conc. 53,5 g/T 3,56 g/T 94,1 %
(Quebec)*
*Flotationconcentratesrequiringpretreatmentbyoxidation
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Environmental
Recognition
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Somine Hati Project vs
Nichromet Technology
Mining plan
Near surface resources (open pit potential, low operating cost)
RodgerAllenGoldMine
Great Potential for a
Nichromet plant in Hati
Phase I
Bring the top layer of the deposit into production
with a modular plant to process oxides
concentrate
15 M$ investment for the modular plant only
Potential of 25 000 oz Au/year
Phase II
1000 TPD Mine and full scale processing plant
Gold production rate of 35 000 oz Au/yr
Investment for Nichromet processing plant of 35
M$
RodgerAllenGoldMine