Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
d d d
u
dx dx dx
d u
0
dx
x wp x pe
uw ue
w e
W P E
x we
uA e uA w A A
x e x w
uA e uA w 0
&
F u D
x
Fw u w Fe u e
w e
Dw De
xwp x pE
Fee Fw w De E P Dw P w
Fe Fw 0
THE CENTRAL
DIFFERENCING SCHEME
e P E / 2
w W P / 2
Fe
p E W P De E P Dw P W
Fw
2 2
Fw Fe Fw Fe
Dw De
2 2 p Dw 2 W De 2 E
Fw Fe
Dw De Fe Fw p
2 2
Fw
Fe
Dw w De E
2 2
a p p aww aEE
aw aE ap
Fw Fe
Dw
2
De a w a E Fe Fw
2
A property is transported by
means of convection and diffusion
through the one dimensional
domain sketched in Figure 5.2.
FOR END NODE A
e A
(e p ) (P A ) (u ) e (u ) A
xe x / 2
Fe
(e p ) FA A De (e p ) 2 DA (P A )
2
Fe Fe
e P FA A DEE De p 2 DAP 2 DA A
2 2
Grouping the above equation in the form
a pP aww aee s u
Fe Fe
( De 2 DA ) p 0 ( De )e FA A 2 DA A
2 2
Now we have to re arrange ap in the form
a p aw ae ( Fe Fw ) S p
Fe
a p 0 ( De ) ( Fe Fw ) [(2 DA Fw )]
2
The governing equation is
( 5.3 ), boundary conditions
are 0 = 1 at x = 0 and L
Case 3:
Recalculate the solution for u = 2.5 m / s
with 20 grid nodes and compare the results
with the analytical solution. The following
data apply: length L = 1.0 m.
= 1.0 kg / m3, = 0.1 kg / m / s
CENTRAL DIFFERENCE MET
H Ox D
A B
1 2 3 4 5
=1 =o
x=o W w P e E x=L
x x
NODE-A
Fe
P E FA A De E P D A P A
2
NODE-B
Fw
FB B P W DB B P Dw P w
2
a p p aww a E E S u
a p aW a E Fe Fw S P
Node aw aE Sp Su
1 0 D-F/2 - ( 2D + F ) ( 2 D + F ) A
3 D+F/2 D-F/2 0 0
5 D+F/2 0 - ( 2D - F ) ( 2 D - F ) B
2.7183 exp( x )
x
1.7183
1.0
0.8
Exact Solution
0.6
0.4
Numerical
0.2 Solution ( CD )
Numerical Solution ( CD )
Exact Solution
1.0
0.6
Exact Solution
0.4
0.2 U = 2 . 5 m /s
Conservativeness
Boundedness
Transportiveness
CONSERVATIVENESS
To ensure conservation of for
the whole solution domain the
flux of leaving a control volume
across a certain face must be
equal to the flux of entering the
adjacent control volume through
the same face.
CONSISTENT SPECIFICATION
OF DIFFUSIVE FLUXES
G r a d i e n t = ( 2 - 2 ) / x
1
3
2
4
qA 1 qB
2 3 4
x / 2 x x x x / 2
2 1 q
3 2 2 1
e1 x
A e2 x
w2
x
4 3 3 2
e1 w1
x x
q B W 4
4 3 q q
x B A
INCONSISTENT SPECIFICATION
OF DIFFUSIVE FLUXES
1 Quadratic
function 2
2
3
4
q A
1 2 3 q B
4
x x x
x / 2 x / 2
BOUNDEDNESS
Scarborough has shown that a sufficient
condition for a convergent iterative method can
be expressed in terms of the values of the
coefficients of the discretised equations.
anb 1 at all nodes
a' p < 1 at one node at least
Here ap is the net coefficient of the central node
P ( i.e. ap Sp ) and the summation in the
numerator is taken over all the neighbouring
Diagonal dominance is a desirable feature
P E
W
F u
Pe
D / x
Thus the value of at E is affected
only by upstream conditions and
since there is no diffusion E is equal
to P. It is very important that the
relationship between the magnitude
of the Peclet number and the
directionality of influencing, known
as the transportiveness, is borne out
in the discretisation scheme.
INTERNAL COEFFICIENTS OF
DISCRETISED SCALAR
TRANSPORT
aw aE aP
Fw Fe
Dw De a w a E ( Fe Fw )
2 2
Fe / De Pee 2
UPWIND DIFFERENCING
SCHEMEWHEN IS POSI
TIVE
w w E
P e
uw ue
W W e
E
P
xWw xwP xPe xeE
w W & e P
FeP FwW De (E P ) Dw (P W )
( Dw De Fe )P ( Dw Fw )w DeE
DA
1 (9 p 8 A E )
x 3
( Dw FE )u De E
UPWIND DIFFERENCING
S C H E M E W H E N I S N E GA T I V E
e E
w w P
uw ue
e
E
W w P
xWw xwP xPe xeE
w P & e E
Fe E Fw P De ( E P ) Dw ( P w )
[ Dw ( De Fe ) ( Fe Fw )]P Dww ( De Fe )E
a p p aww aE E
a p aw aE ( Fe Fw )
aw aE
Fw > 0, Fe > 0 Dw + F w De
Fw < 0, Fe < 0 Dw De - F e
aw aE
Dw max( Fw ,0) De max(0, Fw )
U PW I N D S O LU T I O N T O S AM E PR O B LE M
NODE1 : Fe P FA A De ( E P ) DA ( P A )
3 D+F D 0 0
4
5 D+F 0 -2D 2 D B
The governing equation is
( 5.3 ), boundary conditions
are 0 = 1 at x = 0 and L
Case 3:
Recalculate the solution for u = 2.5 m / s
with 20 grid nodes and compare the results
with the analytical solution. The following
data apply: length L = 1.0 m.
= 1.0 kg / m3, = 0.1 kg / m / s
UPWIND DIFFERENCING
SCHEME
Node aw ae Sp Su
1 0 DF/2 - ( 2D + F ) ( 2D + F ) A
5 D+F/2 0 - ( 2D - F ) ( 2D + F ) B
a p p aww aee S u
a p aw ae ( Fe Fw ) S p
F = x U
= 1 x 0.1
= 0.1
D = / x
= 0.1 /0.2
= 0.5
FOR END NODE A
aw = 0
ae = 0.45
Sp = - 1.1
Su = 1 . 1 A
FOR INTERMEDIATE NODES
aw = 0 . 55
ae = 0 . 45
Sp = 0
Su = 0
a = 1
FOR END NODE B
aw = 0 . 5 5
ae = 0
Sp = - 0 . 9
Su = 0 . 9 B
ap = aw +ae + ( Fe Fw ) -
ap p = a w w + a e e + Su
1 . 55 p = 0 + 0 . 4 5 e + 1 .1 A
1 p = 0 . 5 5 w + 0 . 4 5 e
p = 0 . 5 5 w + 0 . 4 5 e
p = 0 . 5 5 w + 0 . 4 5 e
1 = d1 / b1
i = bi - ( ai ci 1 / i -1 )
Ti = i - ( Ci Ti + 1 / i )
= (d - a ) /
1 = 1.55
1 = 0.70
2 = 0.84
3 = 0.70
4 = 0. 65
5 = 1.06
2 = 0.45
3 = 0.35
4 = 0.29
T 5 = 5
T 5 = 0.150
T 4 = 0.39
T 3 = 0.60
T 2 = 0.77
1
1.195
0.77
2
3
= 0.60
0.39
4
0.150
UPWIND DIFFERENCING
S C H E M E ( U = 2.5 m /s )
Node aw ae Sp Su
1 0 DF/2 - ( 2D + F ) ( 2D + F ) A
5 D+F/2 0 - ( 2D - F ) ( 2D + F ) B
a p p aww aee S u
a p aw ae ( Fe Fw ) S p
ap p = aw w + a e e + S u
ap = aw + ae +( Fe Fw ) Sp
F = x u
= 2.5 m / s
D = / dx
= 0.5
FOR END NODE A
aw = 0
ae = D F / 2
= - 0.75
Sp = - ( 2D + F )
= - 3.5
Su = 3 . 5 A
FOR INTERMEDIATE NODES
aw = D + F / 2
= 1.75
Qe = D - F / 2
= - 0.75
Sp = 0
FOR END NODE B
aw = D + F / 2
= 1.75
ae = 0
Sp = -(2D - F)
= 1.5
Su = ( 2D F ) B
= - 1.5 B
ap p = a w w + a e e + Su
2 . 7 5 p = - 0 . 7 5 e + 3 . 5 A
p = 1 . 7 5 w - 0 . 7 5 e
p = 1 . 7 5 w - 0 . 7 5 e
p = 1 . 7 5 w - 0 . 7 5 e
1 = d1 / b1
i = bi - ( ai ci 1 / i -1 )
Ti = i - ( Ci Ti + 1 / i )
= (d - a ) /
1 = 2 . 7 5
1 = 1 . 2 7
2 = 1 . 4 8
3 = 1 . 8 8
4 = 1 . 6 9
2 = 1.50
3 = 1.40
4 = 1.45
5 = 2.48
T 5 = 5 = 2.48
T 4 = 0.349
T 3 = 1.260
T 2 = 0.86
T 1 = 1.035
1
1.035
0.86
2
3 = 1.260
0.349
4
2.48
1.0
U 0.1 m / s
0.8
0.6
0.2
Numerical Solution ( UD )
0.0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
NUMERICAL RESULTS &
ANALYTICA L SOLUTION
1.2 U=2.5m/s
1.0
0.8
0.6 Numerical Solution ( UD )
0.4
Exact Solution
0.2
0.0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Distance ( m )
FLOW DOMAIN FOR THE
ILLUSTRATION OF FALSE DIFFUSION
= 100 X = 100
= 0
V=2m/s
X
=0
U=2m/s
HYBRID DIFFERENCING
SCHEME
Fw ( u ) w
Pew
Dw w / xWP
1 2 1 2
qw Fw 1 W 1 P
2 Pe w 2 Pe w
for 2 Pe 2
q w Fw Aw w for
Pe 2
q w Fw Aw P for
Pe 2
a P P a w w a E E
aP aw aE ( Fe Fw )
aw aE
Fw Fe
max Fw, Dw ,0 max Fe , De ,0
2 2
FeP FA A 0 DA (P A )
FBP Fww DB (B P ) 0
a P P aww a E E S u
aP aw aE ( Fe Fw ) S p
Node aw ae Sp Su
1 0 0 - ( 2 D + F ) ( 2 D + F ) A
3 F 0 0 0
4
5 F 0 -2D 2 D B
0.0
0.0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Distance ( m )
aPP aww aEE ass aNN aBB arr )
a P aw a E as a N a B aT F
One dimensional Two - Three
flow dimensional flow dimensional flow
F
aw
F F
max Fw , Dw w ,0 max Fw , Dw w ,0 max Fw , Dw w ,0
2
2
2
aE
F F F
max Fe , Dw e ,0 max Fe , De e ,0 max Fe , De e ,0
2
2 2
as F
max Fs , Ds s ,0
F
max Fs , Ds s ,0
2
2
F
aN F
max Fn , Dn n ,0
max Fn , Dn n ,0
2
-
2
F
aB
max Fb , Db b ,0
2
-
ar
F
max Ft , Dt t ,0
2
F Fe Fw Fe Fw Fn Fs Fe Fw Fn Fs Ft Fb
Face w e s n b t
F u w Aw u A
e e
v s As v n An w b Ab w t At
w e s n b t
D Aw Ae As An Ab At
xWP x PE y SP y PN z PN z PT
POWER LAW SCHEME
qw Fw [w w (P w )] for 0 Pe 10
W = ( 1 0.1 Pew ) 5
/ Pew
q w Fw w for Pe>10
aP aw aE ( Fe Fw )
aw aE
Dw max O, (1 0.1 / Pew /) max[ Fw ,0]
5
De max O, (1 0.1 / Pee /) 5 max[ Fe ,0]
QUADRATIC PROFILES USED
IN THE QUICK SCHEME
W p e E
EE
WW
w
WW W w P e E EE
6 3 1
face i 1 i i 2
8 8 8
6 3 1
w W p WW
8 8 8
6 3 1
e p E W
8 8 8
6 3 1 6 3 1
Fe 8 P 8 E 8 W Fw 8 W 8 P 8 WW
De (E p ) Dw ( p w )
3 6 6 1
Dw 8 Fw De 8 Fe p Dw 8 Fw 8 Fe W
3 1
De Fe E FwWW
8 8
aw aE aww ap
6 1 3 1
Dw Fw Fe De Fe Fe a w a E a ww ( Fe Fw )
8 8 8 8
6 3 1
w P W E
8 8 8
6 3 1
e E p EE
8 8 8
aw aE aEE ap
3 6 1 1
Dw Fw De Fe FW Fe a w a E a EE ( Fe Fw )
8 8 8 8
aP aw aE aWW aEE ( Fe Fw )
aw aE aE aEE
6 1
Dw w Fw e Fe 3 6
8 8 De e Fe (1 e ) Fe
1 8 8 1
w Fw (1 e ) Fe
3 8 1 8
(1 w ) Fw (1 w ) Fw
8 8
A
0
x / 2 x / 2
0 P
Mirror Domain Node 1
Node Boundary
o 2 A p
6 3 1
e p E (2 A p )
8 8 8
7 3 2
e p E A
8 8 8
DA
1 (9 p 8 A E )
x 3
7 3 2 DA
Fe p E A FA A De (E p ) (9 p 8 A E )
8 8 8 3
DB
B (8 B 9 P w )
x 3
6 3 1
FB B Fw w p ww
8 8 8
DB
(8 B 9 p w ) Dw ( p w )
3
6 3 1 7 3 2
Fe p E w Fw w p A
8 8 8 8 8 8
De ( E p ) Dw ( p w )
a p aww aw aE ( Fe Fw ) S p
The governing equation is
( 5.3 ), boundary conditions
are 0 = 1 at x = 0 and L
Case 3:
Recalculate the solution for u = 2.5 m / s
with 20 grid nodes and compare the results
with the analytical solution. The following
data apply: length L = 1.0 m.
= 1.0 kg / m3, = 0.1 kg / m / s
HYBRID SCHEME
x
A B
1 2 3 4 5
=1 =o
x=o W w P e E x=L
x x
a P P aww a E E S u
aP aw aE ( Fe Fw ) S p
Node aw ae Sp Su
1 0 0 - ( 2 D + F ) ( 2 D + F ) A
3 F 0 0 0
4
5 F 0 -2D 2 D B
Fe p FA A 0 D A ( p A )
FB p Fww DB ( B p ) 0
a p p aww aee Su
a p aw ae ( Fe Fw ) S p
F = xu
= 2.5
D = / dx
= 0.5
Pe = u/ ( / x)
= 5
If Pe > 2, Hybrid
Scheme uses
Upwind Expression
for Convection term
& Set Diffusion
Term to Zero
NODE-1
Fe p FA A 0 D A ( p A )
NODE-5
FB p Fww DB ( B p ) 0
a p p aww aee Su
a p aw ae ( Fe Fw ) S p
3.5
3.5 0 0 0 0 1
=
2
-2.5 2.5 0 0 0 3
0
0 -2.5 2.5 0 0 0
4
0 0 -2.5 2.5 0 0
5
0 0 0 -2.5 3.5
1 d1
b1 C1 0 0 0
=
2 d2
a2 b2 c2 0 0 3 d3
0 a3 b3 c3 0 4 d4
0 0 a4 b4 c4 5 d5
1 = b1
1 = d1 / b1
i = bi - ( ai ci 1 / i -1 )
Ti = i - ( Ci Ti + 1 / i )
= (d - a ) /
1 = 3.5
1 = 1
2 = 2.5
= 2.5
4 = 2.5
5 = 3.5
2 = 1
3 = 1
4 = 1
T5 = 0.71428
T4 = 1
T3 = 1
T2 = 1
1
1
1
2
3 = 1
1
4
0 . 7143