ANALYSIS OF DRILLING BIT IN 12

HOLE TRAJECT IN
HORIZONTAL WELL A, B, AND
WELL C FIELD P

N A M E : FA I S H A L H A F I Z H
MAJOR: DRILLING
S T E M A KA M I G A S C E PU
02 MARCH 2017
 ABSTRACT
Drilling 12 hole section in field C always need two unit
drilling bits. Somehow, based on dull grading result taken in
the three different wells sample, most of the bits are still
capable to drill until total depth. They have same
manufacture, but differ in the specification. Before
observing the performance of drilling bits, its needed to
know the design of the bits based on their specification and
features given by manufacture. Cost per foot must be
calculated to know every drilling bit performance in that
field. If we look from IADC system code, those bits criteria
have been suitable for drilling the formation in field C. For
mostly, sandstone are dominant in the Field P, so that its
categorized as soft to medium formation. In addition, Cost
per foot result shows that the bits are actually able to drill
till TD. Therefore, there are two scenario to analyse
efficiency in the using of drilling bits. First scenario is to drill
until TD by using one bit and the second scenario is by
using two bits. From those scenario which one is better to
be applied in the field P, regarding by cost per foot analysis.
 Evaluation of PDC Bit
Bit Record
Performance Using Two
Review Cost/foo Scenario
t
PDC Bit Analysis PDC Bit Change
Classification Consideration &
& Features Reason
 Bit Record
Well Name Well A Well A Well B
12 Well D
Well B Well D Well C Well C

Bit Status RR NEW NEW NEW NEW NEW RR NEW

Depth In 1500 4714 1658 6010 1703 5449 1629 4540
(ft)
Depth Out 4714 6053 6010 6618 5449 5958 4540 6075
(ft)
Tipe Bit SKRE51 SKH519 SKFX519 SKH519M MRS519H S519VHS SKH519 SKRE519
9M M M PX PX M M
IADC Code M422 M422 M422 M422 M223 S223 M422 M422
Nozzles 5 x 16 5 x 16 5 x 15 5 x16 2 x 12, 5 3 x 12, 6 2 x 16, 2x14,
x 14 x 13 3 x 16 3x15
Footage 3214 1339 4352 608 3746 509 2911 1535
(ft)
Drilling 73.65 48.75 128.5 56.25 111./25 141.5 51.5 57
time (Hrs)
Avg.ROP 44.6 27.5 33.9 11.7 33.7 30.1 56.5 26.9
(ft/Hrs)
WOB 8-18 10-15 8-26 20-25 8-15 8-15 8-15 15-20
(Klbs)
RPM 40-55 55 70-80 70-80 55 55 50 50
Flow Rate 750-800 770-780 700-780 720-760 780-800 800 800 800
GPM
SPP (Psi) 1400- 2100- 1600- 2550- 1600- 1600- 1750- 2300-
2070 2450 2680 2700 2650 2680 2350 2450
Dull 2-3-WT- 1-1-WT- 2-4-CT-A- 1-1-CT-S- 3-4-CT-S- 1-1-CT-G- 3-2-WT- 1-1-WT-A-
grading A-X-I- A-X-I- X-I-LT/BT- X-I-NO-TD X-2/16- X-I-NO-TD A-X- X-I-CT-TD
NO-RIG NO-TD RP WT-PR 1/16-CT-
BHA
Formation - Minas - Telisa - Minas - Telisa - Minas - Telisa - Minas - Telisa
Drilled - Telisa - - Telisa - Bekasap - Telisa - Bekasap - Telisa -
Bekasap A A Bekasap
A A
ROP (ft/hr) 44.6 27.5 33.9 11.7 33.7 14.7 56.5 26.9
 Sistem Klasifikasi Bit NOV
12 PDC Bit SKRE519M Design Features

Seeker Designed to overcome directional drilling

directional bits chakkanges for both motor or RSS
Razor Edge More aggressive chamfer angle to
Cutter enhance ROP and improve drilling
efficiency
Smooth Torque Inserts between primary cutters to provide
predictable torque response to applied
WOB and reduction in torque varience
Smooth steer Deliver max.gauge contact, lowering
Gauges resistance to steer by reducing torque

IADC Code M422 Diamond back Enhance durability, provide increased

cutters cutter density to some blades
Bit Profile Short Taper-Medium Cone

Body Material Matrix

Type Qty Location Diameter Shape

Primary 33 FACE 19 mm RAZOREDGE
Primary 2 FACE 13 mm RAZOREDGE
Pimary 8 GAUGE 13 mm CYLINDER
Secondary 10 FACE 19 mm RAZOREDGE
TCC 8 FACE 16 mm DOME TOPPED
Smooth 5 FACE 16 mm DOME TOPPED
Torque
Laterals
 12 PDC Bit IADC M422

12 PDC Bit SKH519M Design Features

Seeker Designed to overcome directional drilling

directional bits chakkanges for both motor or RSS
Helios Cutter Advanced thermostable cutters designed
for max.thermal toughness to reduce
cutterdegradation
Smooth Torque Inserts between primary cutters to
provide predictable torque response to
applied WOB and reduction in torque
varience
Dual Action Provide back reaming capability and
Gauge moderate side cutting ability
Bit Profile Short taper, shallow cone

Type Qty Location Diameter Shape

Primary 33 FACE 19 mm CYLINDER
Primary 4 GAGE 19 mm CYLINDER
Primary 6 GAGE 13 mm CYLINDER
Primary 5 BACK ANGLE 13 mm CYLINDER
TCC 7 FACE 16 mm FLAT TOPPED
Impact FACE 14 mm FLAT TOPPED
13
Arrester
Impact FACE 16 mm FLAT TOPPED
5
Arrester
 12 PDC Bit IADC Code M422

12 PDC Bit SKRE519M Design Features

Seeker directional Designed to overcome directional
bits drilling chakkanges for both motor or
RSS
Dura Force Impact Designed for maximized impact
Resisrtance Cutter toughness
Smooth Torque Inserts between primary cutters to
provide predictable torque response to
applied WOB and reduction in torque
varience
Smooth steer Deliver max.gauge contact, lowering
Gauges resistance to steer by reducing torque
Diamond back Enhance durability, provide increased
cutters cutter density to some blades
Type Qty Location Diameter Shape
Primary 33 FACE 19 mm CYLINDER
Primary 10 GAGE 13 mm CYLINDER
Secondary 10 FACE 19 mm CYLINDER
TCC 8 FACE 16 mm DOME TOPPED
Smooth
Torque 5 FACE 16 mm DOME TOPPED
Laterals
Upstream BACK 13 mm CYLINDER
5
ANGLE
 COST PER FOOT ANALYSIS WELL A
Assumption Data For First
Bit Run
Footage: 3217 ft ROP Average: 43.81 ft/hr

Bit No: SKRE519M (RR) Tot.Drilling Time: 73.43 hr

Bit Cost : 6$/ft IADC Type: M422

Rig Cost : 2083.33 $/ft Jet 1/32: 5x16

Trip Time : 2 hr/1000 ft Depth In : 1497 ft

Make up bit : 3.75 hr Depth Out : 4714 ft

Assumption Data For Second

Bit Run
Footage: 1339 ft ROP Average: 27.46 ft/hr

Bit No:SKH519M, NEW Tot.Drilling Time: 48.76 hr

Bit Cost : 6$/ft IADC Type: M422

Rig Cost : 2083.33 $/ft Jet 1/32: 5x16

Trip Time : 1.635 hr/1000 ft Depth In : 4714 ft

Make up bit : 2.5 hr Depth Out : 6053 ft

 COST PER FOOT ANALYSIS WELL B
Assumption Data For First Bit Run
Footage: 4352 ft ROP Average: 33.9 ft/hr

Bit No:SKFX519M (NEW) Tot.Drilling Time: 128.51 hr

Bit Cost : 6$/ft IADC Type: M422

Rig Cost : 2083.33 $/ft Jet 1/32: 5x15

Trip Time : 1.38 hr/1000 ft Depth In : 1658 ft

Make up bit : 3.5 hr Depth Out : 6010 ft

Assumption Data For Second Bit Run

Footage: 605 ft ROP Average: 10.8 ft/hr

Bit No:SKH519M (NEW) Tot.Drilling Time: 56.25 hr

Bit Cost : 6$/ft IADC Type: M422

Rig Cost : 2083.33 $/ft Jet 1/32: 5x16

Trip Time : 1.635 hr/1000 ft Depth In : 6013 ft

Make up bit : 2.5 hr Depth Out : 6618 ft

 COST PER FOOT ANALYSIS WELL C
Assumption Data For First Bit
Run
Footage: 2964 ft ROP Average: 56.6 ft/hr

Bit No:SKH519M (RR) Tot.Drilling Time: 52.4 hr

Bit Cost : 6$/ft IADC Type: M422

Rig Cost : 2083.33 $/ft Jet 1/32: 2x16,3x15

Trip Time : 2.65 hr/1000 ft Depth In : 1576 ft

Make up bit : 3.5 hr Depth Out : 4540 ft

Assumption Data For Second Bit

Run
Footage: 1535 ft ROP Average: 26.9 ft/hr

Bit No:SKRE519M(NEW) Tot.Drilling Time: 57 hr

Bit Cost : 6$/ft IADC Type: M422

Rig Cost : 2083.33 $/ft Jet 1/32: 3x16, 2x18

Trip Time : 1.64 hr/1000 ft Depth In : 4540 ft

Make up bit : 3.5 hr Depth Out : 6075 ft

 Bit Change Consideration Hole Traject 12
Slope Total Drilling Total
Well Name Tipe PDC Bit
CPF Footage Time CPF
Sumur A SKRE519M -0.70466 3214 ft 73.65 hr 53.55

First Scenario: using (RR) $/ft

SKH519M -4.1485 1339 ft 48.75 hr 81.87
combination of two
bits to reach TD (NEW) $/ft
Sumur B SKFX519M -0.0213 4352 ft 128.5 hr 67.52

$/ft
SKH519M -19.28 608 ft 56.25 hr 199.71

$/ft
Sumur C SKH519M -2.0319 2911 ft 51.5 hr 42.82

$/ft
SKRE519M -2.8142 1535 ft 57 hr 83.49
as the value of the slope bigger indicates the
capability of drilling bits to drill remaining footage $/ft

becomes smaller, so they must be changed.

Optimum running bit is reached by running
SKH519M w/
footage 2911 ft for first run & SKRE519M
w/footage 1535 ft
for second run
Those bit combination results the minimum
drilling time & total CPF are respectively 108.5 hr
Bit Change Consideration Hole
Traject 12
First step: Predict ROP by plotting
Exampless given for bit
footage drillied vs ROP, find
SKRE519M in well A to model
trendline
the scenario, there are some Third Step:
steps as follow:
other
Second
Scenario:usi alternative,
ng only one plot footage
bit to reach vs drilling
TD
time, find
Second Step: Plot ROP trendline,
prediction vs drilling time, Y= -0.0179 x + 104.93
take the
find trendline to predict biggest value
drilling time of drilling
time

y = 8.5555e0.0006x

O
r
y = -0.5693x + 84.771
 Evaluation Result of the using of PDC Bit in Field
C
Well Name Parameter Skenario I Skenario II
CPF 53.55 $/ft 81.87 $/ft 149.43 $/ft7.5
Trip time (TT) 2 hr/1000 fturs/ 1.635 hr/1000 ft 2 hr/1000 ft
TT cost/ft 4.16 $/ft 3.4 $/ft -
Well A
Footage 3214 ft 1339 ft 4553 ft
ROP 44.6 ft/hr 27.5 ft/hr 23.43 ft/hr
Drilling time 73.65 hr 48.75 131.43 hr
CPF 67.52 $/ft 199.71 $/ft 227.5 $/ft
Trip time (TT) 2.76 hr/1000 ft 1.635 hr/1000 ft 2.76 $/1000 ft
TT cost/ft 5.75 $/ft 3.4 $/ft -
Well B
Footage 4352 ft 608 ft 4960 ft
ROP 33.9 ft/hr 11.7 ft/hr 30.87 ft/hr
Drilling time 128.5 hr 56.25 hr 173.44 hr
Well C CPF 42.82 $/ft 83.49 $/ft 117.67 $/ft
Trip time (TT) 2.65 hr/1000 ft 1.64 hr/1000 ft 2.65 hr/1000 ft
TT cost/ft 5.52 $/ft 3.42$/ft -
Footage 2911 1535 4446 ft
ROP 56.5 ft/hr 26.9 ft/hr 54.94 ft/hr
Drilling time 51.5 57 102.23 hr

Well A Well B Well C

Scenario 1 Scenario II Scenario II
Tot.CPF: 143 $/ft Tot.CPF:184.75 $/ft Tot.CPF:117.67$/ft
Tot.Drilling time: 122.4 Tot.Drilling time:173.4 Tot.Drilling
hr hr Time:102.23 hr
 Kesimpulan
O Most of the well is better to use second scenario, but it
can be applied w/ the consideration of there was no
mechanical problem.
O First scenario is best applied by using SKH519M w/total
CPF is 117$/ft, ROP prediction is 54.94 ft/hr and
tot.drilling time102.23 hr
O Second scenario is best applied by combining SKH519M
and SKRE519M w/ average ROP respectively is 56.5 ft/hr
for 2911 ft footage and 26.9 ft/hr for 1535 ft footage and
tot, tot.drilling time108.5 hr w/ CPF respectively
42.82$/ft and 83.49 $/ft
O Optimizing to determine how much footage that must be
reached for each bit run is best practice for optimization
of second scenario
Terima Kasih