Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
DETERMINANTS ON
ENVIRONMENT: EVIDENCES
FROM SOUTH EAST ASIAN
REGION
Present by:
NOOR-UL-AIN
KHAN
MSCF-09
INTRODUCTION
Ameer and Munir (2016) said that humanity and economy can grow
without effecting nature.
According to the Global Climate Risk Index (2015) Pakistan is also included among those top ten
countries which is badly affected by environment change.
Pakistan is considered in developing countries, specifically in those republics who fall in low middle
income group. It has been facing worst energy crisis for the past few years and its energy demand
is continuously increasing with economic and population growth. While, Pakistans financial sector
has shown a notable growth due to financial reforms (Komal and Abbas, 2015).
Macro-economic variables have strong impact on environment. While Carbon dioxide contributes
about 58% of the total green house emissions of the world. Globally carbon emission is increasing
at a higher rate. (Zaman et al., 2015). So, it is necessary to find out the impact of macro economic
variables on environment (CO2 emission) in South East Asian region.
As, trade openness increases, the utilization of fuels also enhances due to their heavy consumption
in transport and energy (Ameer and Ummalla, 2016).
LITERATURE REVIEW
Many researchers investigated the effect of economic growth on carbon dioxide
emission. The findings of the studies showed that pollution and income variables
has long run co-integration in time series, and panel data suggested that air
emission increase as income increases (Abdulai and Ramcke, 2009; Akbostanci
et al., 2009). While, some researchers had found that the carbon dioxide
emission reduces as the income per capita grows (Narayan et al., 2010).
In many high level-income countries free trade had insignificant effect on carbon
dioxide emissions but in low-level income countries free trade has significant
impact on CO2 emissions.
Trade openness effects environment in three ways: technology effect, scale
effect and composition effect (Antweiler and Copeland, 2001).
Furthermore, it is said that the net effect of trade openness is ambiguous
because it depends which effect dominant on environment from all of three.
Usually, composition and scale effects are dominant and both have adverse
effect on environment (Shahzad et al., 2017).
When people migrate from rural areas to urban areas they consume more
energy which cause environmental pollution (Chandran and Tand, 2013; Kasi
and Sami, 2016).
LITERATURE REVIEW
Definition of key constructs
Names, definitions, and sources.
Variables Definition Sourc
(Measurement) es
Energy consumption (kt Utilizing primary energy that is equal to native production WDI
of oil equivalent) including imports and stock changes, and excluding
exports and fuel supplied to aircraft and ships transport.
Gross Domestic Product It refers to collective gross value added by all local WDI
(Current US dollar) manufacturers in the country including product taxes and
excluding subsidies not included in value of the products.
Urbanization (% of urban People residing in urban areas as percentage of total WDI
population in total population of the country.
population)
Financial Development It means financial capital granted to private sector, i.e. WDI
(Domestic credit to through loans, trade credits, purchases of non-equity
private sector as % of securities, and other accounts receivable that setup a
GDP) claim for reimbursement.
Trade Openness (Trade It refers to enrollment in secondary education in all WDI
as % of GDP) programs, regardless of age.
CO2 emissions (metric Co2 emissions reflects energy related human activities. WDI
tons per capita)
RESEARCH GAP AND THE
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
RESEARCH GAP
Existing literature shows that many researchers have focused on the relationship
of economic growth and energy consumption or on the relationship of economic
growth and environmental pollution, but only few numbers of studies has
analyzed these two relationships in same framework. More over, we have added
three macro economics variables in case of South East Asian region: financial
development, trade openness and urbanization.
However, according to my best knowledge, it is noticed that limited number of
studies available on this issue in case of South East Asian region.
SIGNIFICANCE
As, Pakistan and China are going to start their various energy base projects in
Pakistan. So, this study will help to fulfill the gap in recent studies by providing
fresh and additional evidences related to the impact of macro-economic
determinants on environment by using carbon dioxide emission as a proxy.
This study will help the policy makers in making policies and plans related to
economic, social and most importantly in environmental investment projects. It
will indicate them to invest more in clean energy projects by analyzing high
technology and innovation element in them.
OBJECTIVES AND RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
OBJECTIVES
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
MACRO ECONOMICS
DETERMINANTS
ENERGY
CONSUMPTION
ECONOMIC GROWTH
CO2 EMISSIONS
FINANCIAL
DEVELOPMENT
TRADE OPENNESS
URBANIZATION
HYPOTHESIS
Following are the hypothesis which have been constructed
from model.
H1: Energy consumption has significant impact on CO 2
emission.
H2: Economic growth has significant effect on CO emission
2
emission.
H4: Trade openness has significant effect on CO emission.
2
CO2 emission.
As, the level of income of people increase, they consume more energy due to which CO 2
emission increase.
New technology reduces the consumption of energy due to which CO 2 emissions
decreased.
While, trade openness also effects CO 2 emissions due to use of more fuel. When more
fuel consume than energy consumption increase and it make the environment polluted.
Furthermore, it is indicated that the relationship between free trade and environment is
both in short and long run (Shahzad et al., 2017; Nasir and Rehman, 2011). While, some
studies showed trade openness has negative impact on environment (Shahbaz et al.,
2012).
Previous studies results indicated that population growth, energy sector has a significant
impact on CO2 emission (Cole and Neumayer, 2004; Feng and Lantz, 2006, Mason 2011).
IMPLEMENTATIONS