Sunteți pe pagina 1din 213

Concrete & Masonry

Prof Dave Hughes

Taught by lectures, tutorials, lab,


CALCRETE & design sessions
Assessed by Class test – multiple choice week
6/7 (30%)
2 hour exam - design exercises
(70%)
Left school when 16 with 7 O’Levels
Left school when 16 with 7 O’Levels
Farnborough Technical College – OND Engineering (1971)
Left school when 16 with 7 O’Levels
Farnborough Technical College – OND Engineering (1971)
Portsmouth Polytechnic – BSc (Hons)
Left school when 16 with 7 O’Levels
Farnborough Technical College – OND Engineering (1971)
Portsmouth Polytechnic – BSc (Hons) (1975)
Surrey University – PhD (1982)
Left school when 16 with 7 O’Levels
Farnborough Technical College – OND Engineering (1971)
Portsmouth Polytechnic – BSc (Hons) (1975)
Surrey University – PhD (1982)
Bradford University (1985)
First Associate Dean (Learning & Teaching)
Mortars – conservation and new build
Introduction

To familiarise you with concrete and mortar


What are concrete & mortar?

Composite of
• Aggregate
• Binder
What are concrete & mortar?
Gravel
Crushed Rock
Composite of
Expanded Clay
• Aggregate Sintered PFA
• Binder Blast Furnace Slag
Steel Shot
Glass
Sea shells
Recycled concrete
What are concrete & mortar?
Portland Cement
Composite of Calcium Aluminate Cement
B-CSA-F Cement
• Aggregate Hydraulic Lime
• Binder Air Lime
Water
PFA
GGBS
Silica Fume
What is concrete?
50

40
Coarse
30 Agg
Fine Agg
% by
Binde
Volume rWater
20
Voids
10

0
What is mortar?
60
50
40
% by 30
Volume
20
10
0
Fine Binder Water Voids
Agg
What are the attractions of concrete?

• In-situ or Pre-cast
• Two states
• Range of finishes
• High compressive strength
• Can be durable
What the down-sides of concrete?

• Cement can be guaranteed but not concrete


• Low tensile strength & toughness
• Can lack durability
• Natural Hydraulic Lime is variable between
and within source
• Lime mortars are more flexible
So what are the differences between
good concrete and bad concrete?

• Application of “know-how” since the


ingredients are the same
So what are the differences between
good concrete and bad concrete?

• Application of “know-how” since the


ingredients are the same

CEMENT & LIME, COMPOSITION,


COMPACTION, CURING, COVER, CARE
Testing of concrete & mortar

• Compressive strength
• Workability

… but durability is more often the key factor

… a function of permeability and composition

… and very rarely tested for


Layout of the rest of the module
Ingredients
Fresh concrete
Hardened concrete - mechanical
Hardened concrete - permeation
Hardened concrete - durability
Mix design
Mortars
Masonry units
Design exercises
Cements and Limes

To present specifications for hydraulic cements


and hydraulic limes
To discuss their hydration and the formation of
microstructure
Terminology of Cements and Limes

SiO2 S
Al2O3 A
CaO C
Fe2O3 F
SO3 S
H20 H
Cements

Portland cement -
Tri Calcium Silicate C3S
Di Calcium Silicate C2S
Tri Calcium Aluminate C3A
Tetra Calcium Aluminoferrite C4AF
History of Cements and Limes
60

50

40
C3 S
30
C2 S
20

10

0
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Manufacture of Portland Cement

H2O ↑ CO2 ↑ Clinker


Add Gypsum
Pre-heat 850oC 1400oC

Grinding & Grinding


Quarrying Blending
Limestone
Clay/Shale
Manufacture of Lime

850oC –
Quarrying Crushing 1000oC
Limestone Slaking
CO2 ↑
Reaction
Lime, Portland Cement & Pozzolanas
%age by wt
NHL PC GGBS PFA CSF
S 15 21 37 48 92
A 1 7 11 26 1
F 1 3 1 10 1
C 60 66 40 2 0
Alk 1 1 1 4 3
CH C3S AS glass AS glass S glass
CaCO3 C2S
C2S C3A
C2AS C4AF
Cement & BS EN 197-1:2000
Composition

CEM I Portland cement


CEM II Portland-composite cement
CEM III Blast furnace cement
CEM IV Pozzolanic cement
CEM V Composite cement
Cement & BS EN 197-1:2000

CEM I Portland cement


95 - 100% clinker
Cement & BS EN 197-1:2000

CEM II Portland-composite cement


65 - 94% clinker plus
6 - 35% GGBS, PFA, limestone dust
6 - 10% CSF
6 - 35% mix of any or all
Cement & BS EN 197-1:2000

CEM III Blast furnace cement


5 - 64% clinker plus
36 - 95% GGBS
Cement & BS EN 197-1:2000

CEM IV Pozzolanic cement


45 - 89% clinker plus
11 - 55% CSF + PFA
Cement & BS EN 197-1:2000

CEM V Composite cement


20 - 64% clinker plus
18 - 50% GGBS + 18 - 50% PFA
Cement & BS EN 197-1:2000
Strength
Strength Compressive Strength (MPa) Initial Set
Class Early strength Standard strength (Mins)
2 days7 days 28 days
32.5 N ≥ 16 ≥ 32.5 ≤ 52.5
≥ 75
32.5 R ≥ 10
42.5 N ≥ 10 ≥ 42.5 ≤ 62.5
≥ 60
42.5 R ≥ 20
52.5 N ≥ 20 ≥ 52.5 ≥
45
Lime & BS EN 459-1:2010

NHL - from a single source of argillaceous or


siliceous limestone with no additions
HL - from a combination of unspecified sources,
may contain PC, GGBS, CSF, natural
pozzolana
FL – same as HL but must specify contents
Lime & BS EN 459-1:2001
Strength
Strength Strength (MPa)
Class 7 days 28 days

NHL/FL 1 0.5 - 3
NHL/HL/FL 2 2-7
NHL/HL/FL 3.5 3.5 - 10
NHL/HL/FL 5 ≥ 2 5 - 15

All limes to be sound ≤ 2 mm


Setting in 1 hour – 14 days!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Basic hydration - text book view

Heat of hydration (J/g)


C3S - 502; C2S - 251; C3A - 837; C4AF - 419
Basic hydration
Basic hydration

C3A + H —> _C3AH6 _


C3A + H + C SH2—> C6A S3H32
Basic hydration

_ _
C3A + H + C SH2—> C6A S3H32
C3S + H —> CSH + CH
Basic hydration

_ _
C6A S3H32 —> C4A SH18
C3A +
_ H —> C4AH19
C4A SH18 & C4AH19 known as AFm
Basic hydration
Slower long term reactions

C2S + H —> CSH + CH

CH + S —> CSH (pozzolanic reaction)


Physical Structure Development
Water
Vapour
Capillary
Adsorbed
Interlayer
Combined
Pore Structure

1 - 5 mm Entrapped air
100 µ m - 1 mm Entrained air
0.01 µ m - 15 µ m Capillary voids
< 0.01 µ m Interlayer or gel voids
Pore Structure Development
Pore Structure Development
Pore Structure Development
1 d PFA
1 d OPC
6 m OPC
6 m PFA
ityP
o
rs

1 10 100 1000
Pore size (nm)
Types of PC

LHPC
SRPC
White
RHPC - (CEM 1R)
Types of PC

LHPC Low C3S, high C2S


SRPC ≤ 3.5% C3A
White No or trace C4AF
RHPC - (CEM 1R) High C3S or high SSA
CALCRETE

Read all of section on cements


Aggregates

To identify key properties as they affect the


properties of concrete
To describe methods of their determination
Types of aggregates by density

Heavyweight
(4000 - 8500 kg/m3)
Normal
(2300 - 2500 kg/m3)
Lightweight
(350 - 1800 kg/m3)
Types of aggregates by density

Heavyweight Magnetite

Iron shot
Normal Lead shot

Lightweight
Types of aggregates by density

Heavyweight Natural Crushed rock


Sand & gravel

Normal

Lightweight Artificial Air cooled slag


Broken brick
Types of aggregates by density

Heavyweight Natural Pumice


Expanded
clay or shale
Normal
Artificial Furnace clinker
Lightweight Foamed slag
Sintered PFA
Strength

Concrete 30 - 80 MPa
Aggregate 70 - 350 MPa
Factors affecting workability of
concrete

Water content
Aggregate type and grading
Mix proportions
Cement fineness
Admixtures
Oven dry

Porosity
Absorption
or porosity Air dry
Total
moisture
content Saturated
surface dry
Free
moisture
content

Moist
Aggregate Type

Shape
Rounded
Irregular
Angular
Flaky
Elongated
Flaky and elongated
Aggregate Type

Texture
Glassy
Smooth
Granular
Rough
Crystalline
Honeycombed
Aggregate Grading

Maximum size
Continuous grading
Aggregate Grading

% age Continuous
passing
Gap

Sieve Size
Sieve Analysis
Sieve Wt ret % ret Cum % ret Cum % pass
5.00 0 0 0 100
2.36 32 16 16 84
1.18 40 20 36 64
0.60 42 21 57 43
0.30 46 23 80 20
0.15 32 16 96 4
Pan 8 4 100 0
Total 200
BS classification - Fine aggregate

Sieve Overall C M F
5.00 89 - 100
2.36 60 - 100 60 - 100 65 - 100 80 - 100
1.18 30 - 100 30 - 90 45 - 100 70 - 100
0.60 15 - 100 15 - 54 25 - 80 55 - 100
0.30 5 - 70 5 - 40 5 - 48 5 - 70
0.15 0 - 15*
* 20% for crushed rock sands
BS classification - Fine
100

80

60

40

20

0
150 300 600 1.18 2.36 5
BS classification - Medium
100

80

60

40

20

0
150 300 600 1.18 2.36 5
BS classification - Coarse

100

80

60

40

20

0
150 300 600 1.18 2.36 5
BS classification - Coarse aggregate

Sieve 20 mm SS 10 mm SS
37.5 100
20.0 85 - 100
14.0 100
10.0 0 - 25 85 - 100
5.0 0-5 0 - 25
2.36 0-5
Impurities

Chlorides
Clay
Organic matter
Unsound particles
CALCRETE

Read aggregate section for winning and


processing and deleterious materials
Revision
0.18

A 0.16

0.14

Cumulative Pore Volume (ml/ gm)


0.12

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
Mean Pore Diameter (µm)
Concrete - Fresh state

To identify the factors which control properties


of concrete in the fresh state
To be able to modify those properties by use of
admixtures
To be able to perform standard workability tests
Key properties

• Fluidity
Workability
• Compactability
• Cohesiveness

Workability is the amount of internal work


required to achieve full compaction
Resistance to flow

Friction & Interference Water lubricated


Criteria for robust workability tests

• Simple equipment
• Easily & quickly performed
• Appropriate for range of workability sought
• Repeatable
Slump

• Truncated cone
• Three equal layers 300 mm
• Rod each layer 25 times
• Scrape off the surface
200 mm
Slump
slump cone

rod

concrete
Slump

Ruler

Slump
Slump

Normal range of slump 50 - 100 mm


Medium workability only
Compacting Factor

• Two cones
• Drop through into cylinder
• Weigh W1
• Fully compact and fill up
• Weigh W2
Compacting Factor

CF = W1 / W2

Normal range 0.70 - 0.95


Low workability with zero
slump
VB

• Slump in cylinder
• Apply standard vibration

Normal range 4 -35 seconds

noi t ar bi V
Very Low workability
Flow Table

• For mortars
• Compact in 2 layers
Flow
• 15 jolts, 1 per second

Typically 17 cm though no
standard
Key factors

Free water content (FWC)


Aggregate & cement fineness (grading)
Aggregate shape and texture
Aggregate moisture state
Proportions of fine to coarse aggregate
Presence of PFA or CSF
Temperature and time
Key factors

Presence of PFA or CSF


Admixtures

• Plasticiser
• Super-plasticiser
• Retarder
• Accelerator
Choice of workability

Level Slump CF Use

V Low 0.78 Roads heavy vibration


Low 25 -50 0.85 Roads light vibration
Medium 75 Mass & rc construction
High 125 Piling and dense steel
V High Self-levelling concrete
Practical considerations

• Bleeding
Practical considerations

• Bleeding
• Plastic settlement
Practical considerations

• Bleeding
• Plastic settlement
• Plastic shrinkage
Practical considerations

• Bleeding
• Plastic settlement
• Plastic shrinkage
• Curing
Practical considerations
• Curing

Strength Permeability Degree of hydration

Degree of hydration Efficiency of curing


Practical considerations

• Bleeding
• Plastic settlement
• Plastic shrinkage
• Curing
• Thermal cracking
Practical considerations
• Thermal cracking
Practical considerations
• Thermal cracking
Hardened concrete - mechanical

To describe the factors affecting strength


To be able to undertake standard strength tests
To describe the factors affecting moisture related
movements
Concrete - Strength
See CALCRETE for details
Most specified by compressive strength
• 100 mm cubes, steel moulds, compacted in
2 layers, 20oC water cure, 28 days, standard
loading rate

Some by indirect tension (flexure or split cylinder)


Labcrete - Realcrete

• curing
• shape
Labcrete - Realcrete
Applied stress

Induced stress
• curing
• shape

Failure cones
of restraint
Labcrete - Realcrete
Strength

UK Europe & USA


1 2
h/w ratio
Factors affecting strength

Properties of materials
Intrinsic
Mix proportions

Age
Factors affecting strength

Intrinsic
Production related Compaction

External environment
Properties of materials

Cement
Aggregates
Water
Cement -
fineness
Properties of materials

Cement
Aggregates
Water
Mix proportions

Water/Cement ratio
Coarse/fine aggregate ratio
Water/Cement ratio

Strength

w/c ratio
Water/Cement ratio

Strength In practice then there is a


limit to how low the w/c can
go.

But w/c is the sole factor for


given conditions

w/c ratio
80
Age 70

60
Strength
50
High
40 Low
Pozz
30

20

10

0
1 10 100 1000
Age
Compaction

1% voids reduces strength by some 5%

Vital to compact until air no longer present but


don’t over-vibrate and segregate mix
Deformation in concrete

Short term
Long term

Applied stress
Environmental factors
Deformation in Concrete

Function of Stiffness
Shrinkage
Creep
“Elastic” behaviour
Tangent
Initial Secant
Stress
tangent

Principally related to
strength

Strain
Deformation in Concrete

Function of Stiffness
Shrinkage
Creep
Factors affecting drying shrinkage

Aggregate
w/c ratio
Size
Humidity

Typical values 0 - 1000 µ ε


Deformation in Concrete

Function of Stiffness
Shrinkage
Creep
Factors affecting creep

Same as for shrinkage plus


Initial moisture content
Applied stress
Storage temperature

Typical values 0 - 1400 µ ε


CALCRETE

Hardened Concrete for revision and exercises


Hardened concrete - permeation

To differentiate between diffusion and


permeability
To relate these to microstructure
Permeation
Permeability is the ease of flow of a liquid as a
result of a pressure difference (eg flow through
dam)
Diffusion is the ease of flow of a species as a
result of a concentration difference (eg sulphates
flowing from groundwater)
Sorptivity is the uptake of water by capilliary
action in unsaturated concrete or mortar
Permeation
Factors affecting permeation

Porosity
Pore size distribution
Inter-connectivity of pores
Tortuosity
Factors affecting permeation
Factors affecting permeation
Factors affecting permeation
Factors affecting permeation
Factors affecting permeation
CALCRETE

See Durability for an alternative explanation


So what are the factors that affect

Porosity
Pore size distribution
Inter-connectivity of pores
w/c ratio
Age
Pozzolanas

1 d PFA
1 d OPC
6 m OPC
Porosity

6 m PFA

1 10 100 1000
Pore size (nm)
Covercrete and Heartcrete

H
Covercrete and Heartcrete

Reinforcing
steel Aggressive
agents
H
CALCRETE

Read Durability - Permeability and Pore Structure


Hardened concrete - durability

To recognise some of the major durability


problems facing concrete
To identify means of combating them by reference
to appropriate microstructures
Major durability problems

Corrosion of reinforcement
Sulphate attack
Frost attack
Alkali silica reaction
Protection of reinforcement

Correct cover
High quality covercrete
High alkalinity
Carbonation

C3S + H —> CSH + CH


CH + CO2 —> CaCO3 + H
Carbonation

Depth

Curing, cement
content, rh

w/c, CO2, temp

Period of exposure
Carbonation corrosion
O2
Fe2O3.H2O
Fe(OH)2

Fe++ 2OH--
O2
H2O

Fe
Metal 2e
Anode Cathode
Chloride corrosion

Marine aggregates
De-icing salt
Sea spray
CaCl2 - accelerator
Chloride corrosion

Marine aggregates Chlorides


De-icing salt
Free in solution
Sea spray
Physically absorbed
CaCl2 - accelerator Chemically bound
Chloride corrosion
Cl-/OH- >0.6 Fe++ +2Cl- = FeCl2
FeCl2 + 2H2O = Fe(OH)2 +2HCl
Cl-

Fe++ OH--
Cl2, O2
H2O

Metal Fe
2e
Anode Cathode
Corrosion control

• Permeation properties
• Cover
• Chloride binding capacity
Binder content
Binder type
• Curing
Sulphate attack
_ _
AFm + CH + S + H —> C6A S3H32

_
Na2SO4 + CH + H —> C_SH2 + 2NaOH
MgSO + CH + H —> C S H + Mg(OH)
4 2 2

MgSO4 + CSH + H —> C S H2 + Mg(OH)2 + SH


Solutions

Low C3A
Permeation properties
CH binding (PFA, GGBS, CSF)
Frost attack
Frost attack

Hydraulic pressure
Osmotic pressure
Ice

Water
Solutions

Drainage
Permeation
Air entrainment
Air entrainment
Air entrainment
Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR)

High alkali levels


Reactive silica
Water
Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR)

High alkali levels NaOH, KOH, Ca(OH)2

Reactive silica
Water Na2O equivalent > 0.6%

= Na2O + 0.658 K20


Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR)

High alkali levels Amorphous silica, eg opal,


volcanic glass
Reactive silica
Water
Cherts, siliceous limestone,
flint
Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR)

High alkali levels


Reactive silica
Water > 75% relative humidity

Temperature
Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR)

Water
AS gel

Gel + water =
Alkali expansion
ASR cracking

Pop-out Map cracking


Solutions

Non reactive aggregates


Low alkali cement
Use of PFA, GGBS, PFA
Remove water
Masonry

Prof Dave Hughes


Brick types

Clay

Calcium Silicate

Concrete
Durability of masonry

Frost

Soluble salts

Movement
Frost
Soluble salts
Soluble salts
Durability of masonry

Water is the key to durable masonry and we


must design structures and select materials
to meet such a threat
Water threat
Water threat
Walls
Freestanding wall
Retaining wall
Weepholes in Austria
Reinforced walls
Reinforced walls
Movement joints
Movement joints
Movement joints
Movement joints
Durability of masonry

Design

Material specification
BS EN 771-1
Clay
Density
<1000 kg/m3 (LD) for protected masonry

>1000 kg/m3 (HD) for un-protected


masonry
BS EN 771-1
Clay

Durability – active salts (%)

Na & K Mg

S0 No limits No limits

S1 0.17 0.18

S2 0.06 0.03
BS EN 771-1
Clay

Durability – Frost

Exposure

F0 Passive

F1 Moderate

F2 Severe
BS EN 771-2
Calcium Silicate

Strength

7, 7.5, 10, 15, 20 ……50, 60, 75


Mortars

Definition

A mixture of sand, other fine


aggregate and a binding agent as a
jointing medium or as a plaster,
render or screed on a surface
Sands

Principal quality factors


• Average particle size
• Range of sizes
• Shape
• Impurities, particularly clay
Sands

Impurities

• Annex D of BS EN 13139:2002
Concrete vs Mortar sands
100

80

60
% passing

40

20

0
0.1 1 10
Sieve Size (mm)
Premise of mix design

Voids between aggregate particles are


filled with binder
Mortar designations – BS5628
By way of example

Unrendered external wall, high


saturation

• 1: 3 to 4 if using PC:sand mortar

For a finer sand tend towards 1:3 rather than 1:4


to achieve desired workability, strength and
durability
New advances in silo mortar

Low energy for sustainability

Binder phase

Sand drying
New advances in silo mortar

Binder phase

Portland cement is high embodied energy

Hydraulic lime is high embodied energy


New advances in silo mortar

Sand drying

Kilns are inefficient

Lime has potential

CaO + H20 Ca(OH)2


New advances in silo mortar

So what binder could be added to


Ca(OH)2 which is low energy?

ggbs
Bradford research
Context - strength
80

70

60
Strength (MPa)

50 M12? NHL
OPC
40
1:2
30 1:3

20

10

0
0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sand:binder ratio
Bradford research
Context - strength
15
NHL

FL
Strength (MPa)

10
NHL
OPC
1:2
1:3
5

0
0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sand:binder ratio
Bradford research
Context - sorptivity
3.0
NHL

FL 2.5
Sorptivity (mm / min
0.5
)

2.0
NHL
OPC
1.5
1:2
1:3
1.0

0.5

0.0
0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sand:binder ratio
Bradford research
Context - wvp
NHL 3.0E-11

FL 2.5E-11
s Pa-1)

2.0E-11
NHL
-2 -1

OPC
WVP (kg m

1.5E-11
1:2
1:3
1.0E-11

5.0E-12

0.0E+00
0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sand:binder ratio
Bradford research
0.25

0.2

0.15 PC
NHL 3.5
1:2:9
0.1 1:3:12
(%
)ityP
o
rs

0.05

0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Pore Size (microns)
Realcrete in mortars?

Bricks
Differing capacity to absorb water

Mortars
Differing capacity to retain water
Realcrete in mortars?
1890

1880

1870

1860
OD Density (kg/m )
3

1850

1840

1830

1820

1810

1800
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.5
Root time (min )
Realcrete in mortars?
30%

25%
Porosity

20%

15%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.5
Root time (min )
Realcrete in mortars?
Comp Strength

3.0
2.5
2.0
Mortar

1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Sorptivity
Sorp of Substrate
1.2
1.0

Sorp of Mortar
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Sorp of Substrate
Realcrete in mortars?

Substrate Comp strength Flex strength


(MPa) (MPa)
Steel 4.7 1.3
OD Ibstock 8.1 2.5
OD Blue 5.6 2.1
Sat Ibstock 4.6 1.4
Sat Blue 4.4 1.6

Binder – NHL 3.5


The End of knowledge acquisition
From next week – design sessions to
develop understanding of design and
application of knowledge

S-ar putea să vă placă și