Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Measuring the
Effectiveness of the
Promotional Program
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pros and Cons of Measuring Effectiveness
Advantages Disadvantages
Time
Evaluating Alternative Strategies
Measuring Effectiveness: Marketers Views
Issue Agree
MPM is a key priority for todays 90%
technology companies.
Laboratory Field
Consumer Juries Dummy Ad Vehicles
Physiological Measures
Theater Tests
Rough Tests
Concept Tests
Readability Tests
Comprehension and
Reaction Tests
Posttesting Methods
Recall Tests
Tracking Association
Studies Measures
Methods
Single-
Recognition
Source
Tests
Systems
Inquiry Tests
Posttesting the Value of a Sponsorship
Test Your Knowledge
In the Field
In the Lab
Positioning Advertising Copy Test (PACT)
1.Concept Testing
2.Rough Testing
Occurs at
Various Stages 3.Finished art or
commercial pretesting
4.Market testing
(posttesting)
Concept Testing
Consumer Juries
Advantages Disadvantages
Consumer may become a
Control
self-appointed expert
Number of ads that can be
Cost effectiveness evaluated is limited
Endorsements by A halo effect is possible
independent third parties
Preference for ad types
Achievement of credibility may overshadow objectivity
Rough Testing Terms
Animatic Rough
Live-action Rough
An Animatic Example from Airwalk
A laboratory method
Galvanic skin
Pupil dilation
response
Testing
Testing
Tracking
Diagnostics
studies
Testing
Single-source Comprehensive
tracking measures
Test marketing
Comprehensive Testing by Ipsos-ASI
Problems With Current Research Methods
Essentials of Effective Testing
Use a consumer
response model
Establish
Use pretests and
communications
posttests
objectives Testing
Understand and
Use multiple
implement
measures
proper research
Test Your Knowledge
Sales
promotions
Shopping cart signage
Other media
Exposure methods
Sponsor-
ships
Tracking measures
Measuring Effectiveness + Efficiency