Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Alexei Ananenko, Valeri Bezpalov, and Boris Baranov didn't prevent the
Chernobyl disaster; they prevented something much, much worse.
RELATION OF MY KQ TO MY RLS:
Taking such Decisions was not a easy task for the Chernobyl suicide squad
members, they would have gone through a serious INTUITIVE feeling. JUDGING
someones decision is not a easy task, it needs a lot of values to put in. In my RLS
one of the member Alexei Ananenko was the only person left, Who knew
WHERE the valve is but EVEN after that he took the decision of saving millions of
lives. DOES the decision taken by him show the LOVE towards the HUMAN
SOCIETY?
AOKs I can use to evaluate MY Knowledge question :
ETHICS
EMOTION
INTUITION
REASON
AOK and WOK
ETHICS CLAIM1#
DEONTOLOGY: This was their duty to protect the country from any disaster. Alexei Ananenko once said
"How could I do that when I was the only person on the shift who knew where the valves were located?"
INTUITION CLAIM1#
They're all heroes, but these three men knew they'd die; they did it anyway, saving the lives of hundreds
of thousands. THIS INTUITIVE FEELING MADE THEM TO BE THE GREATEST.
ETHICS COUNTERCLAIM1#
Virtue Ethics: How can the moral be judged even if the Outcome is a BAD one. And irrespective of the DUTY.
INTUITION COUNTERCLAIM1#
Ones intuition tells that By an act SOMEONE knows that HE will DIE is Giving THE way to SUICIDE. And which
is wrong.
AOK and WOK
ETHICS CLAIM2#
UTILITARANISM: The maximum benefit for the country instead of loosing 3 lives.
EMOTION CLAIM2#
The first reason might be to save millions of lives. Didnt their emotion towards their family played any role.
ETHICS COUNTERCLAIM2#
Should the acts made by the individuals conform to utility (act utilitarianism).
EMOTION COUNTERCLAIM2#
It was good that the military will fund if THEY die, but was that enough for the family members instead for loosing
sole bread earner.
To whom should we blame the knowledge, Of Taking such decision OR The knowledge given by the society.
BLAMEING the DUTY Is a BETTER option. Because Duty for the country is always TAUGHT to the SOLDIERS.
REASON COUNTERCLAIM3#
WONT the REASON STATED EFFECT the young GENERATION in taking such Decisions.
CONCLUSION
NONE of THEM lived. By the time the men surfaced from under the reactor,
all three were showing signs of severe radiation poisoning. Tragically, none
of them survived for more than a few weeks. BUT they Created a HISTORY.
Alexei Ananenko, Valeri Bezpalov, and Boris Baranov didn't prevent the Chernobyl
disaster; they prevented something much, much worse.
The truth is that heroes are all around us. Teachers, health care workers,
and just everyday people are and have the capacity to be heroes in their
own right. No capes needed, just a little faith in the human spirit.
OTHER RLS
DONALD TRUMP