Civilisation and its discontents Essay subject: Secrecy Sentiment and Sociability: the Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth- Century by John Mullan Selection of chapter titles: 1. Sympathy and the Production of Society 2. Richardson: Sentiment and the construction of femininity 3. The Availability of Virtue 5. Hypochondria and Hysteria: Sensibility and the Physicians) Sentiment makes sociability,community Mullan writes about Sterne and Richardson as using language of feeling to show necessary social bonds. In their writings we find sociability which is dependent upon the communication of passions and sentiments (Mullan 2) David Hume wrote My Own Life (essay written in 1776 the year of his death) at the end of his life to be connected with his last publications. Importance of social life and the passions in any thought. Hume saw social bonds threatened by fissile effects of religious and political allegiance, or the desire for acquisition excited by the developing economy (Mullan 3). Need for sentiment The novels of Samuel Richardson, for instance, envisage a responsive feminine sensibility as the best embodiment of social instinct. Enactment of social virtues Richardsons Clarissa (1748) and Pamela (1740) show these bonds of delicacy and feeling (4) Epistolary novels. Letter-writing: Correspondence for Richardson was a cherished experience of sociability and he spoke of social love (5). He called it the converse of the pen and associated it with women freest yet most virtuous communication (5). David Hume, Of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion (1742) and Treatise of Human Nature (1739- 1740) are important for Richardson and Sterne. For Richardson feeling hearts are important. NB For all three, sociability depends upon the traffic not only of opinions, but of harmoniously organized feelings (7) Hume thought that philosophy was feeling. He wrote against Shaftsburys confidently aristocratic assumption that philosophy was simply self-explanatory politeness. These novelists saw reader as exceptional connoisseurs of commendable sympathies (13) With special capacities of sensibility. It is as if the very form of the novel in the eighteenth-century implied a contract, by the terms of which a reader was set apart from the anti-social vices or insensitivities which the novels were able to represent (Mullan 14). See Fielding, Smollet and Richardson. Richardson, Sterne, Smollet and also Mackenzie as writers of sentiment. Sentimentalism is often treated today as a problem and explained away Mullan wishes to redeem this sentiment: a language of feeling devoted to the imagining of sociability new representations of social instinct in the novel (15). How can a language of feeling explain social relations as such? () feeling as articulated by the body by its postures and gestures. Also construction of the body its fixation upon tears, sighs, and meanings beyond words novelistic convention, again, of more than literary significance. For the construction of a sensitive and socialized body the site where the communicative power of feeling is displayed, but also where sensibility can become excessive or uncontrollable (Mullan 16) See also medical discourse in which the body can show privileged sensitivity (vs. unsocial habits of a larger world). A privileged delicacy or refinement can forebode illness () from sensibility to physical incapacity. Illness became the last retreat of the morally pure. What was originally posed as a capacity for sociability was eventually realized in the most private of experiences(Mullan 17). Chap 1: Sympathy and the production of society: Hume in Treatise of Human Nature shows limitations of reason. He shows how desires and judgement are shared and communicated how they are socialized (18). Drive is in passions not reason the only thing that makes achievement is passion. [See idea in Hume of allowing destruction of world to avoid scratching finger]. So Reason must be slave of passion. Hume says: Passions are seen as so contagious that they pass with the greatest facility from one person to another, and produce correspondant movements in all human breasts (Treatise, 605) (Mullan 24). The mobility of passions permits the communication upon which society is founded, the agreeable movements which bind its members together (24). Describing society must be a description of the movements of passions. In 18thc political world passions seen as negative. Refutation of Hobbes who saw passions as primal appetites For Hume passion is sentiment; the proximity of feeling and judgement, impression and idea. SYMPATHY is at the heart of Humes philosophy: fiction writing which shows sympathy PRODUCES society rather than giving a reflection of it. [He could be talking about AUSTEN!] So David Hume and Adam Smith are like Richardson and Sterne [and indeed Austen] they produce narrative on sympathy. In Smiths Theory of Moral Sentiment (1759): he does not trust in sociability but rather sympathy. But the latter must be regulated and chastened. Hume proposes the universality of social understanding which counters excesses sentimental novel. John MULLAN: Chap 2: Richardson: sentiment and the construction of femininity. Sensibility and moral rectitude brought together. Huge influence on writers and readers. Johnson defended Richardson, Denis Diderot adored him. Clarissa last volume published (1748). Sir Charles Grandison was the favourite of Jane Austen who adapted it as a play. George Eliot too. (56). The special powers of feeling, the exceptional reaches of sympathy are set against a world of broken communications (Mullan on Richardson, 61). Richardson liked pathetic scenes he said. In Pamela overflowing aching hearts. heart ache occurs hundreds of times. Clarissa envisages a heartfelt language cast off from the moorings of social habit says Mullan (63). I know my own heart (Pamela, I, 404). Chap 5: Hypochondria and Hysteria: Sensibility and the Physicians Feeling observable in body. When do we see bodies showing sensibility in Sense and Sensibility? Secrecy and Sickness Tanner, Tony, Jane Austen (preface to the reissued edition by Marilyn Gaull), Basingstoke and New York, 2007 [first published 1986]. Tanner says that S&S is not just an embryo of a nineteenth-century novel which struggles but fails to be born as many critics have said, but complex in its use of sensibility and secrecy as two themes Scream of Marianne at the heart of the novel : symptom of the sickness, and the sickness intimately connected with the prevailing secrecy Antithesis was a trait of the Age of Reason (mode of analysis) in Locke and Pope (heroic couplet) Crude antithesis of novel (Walton Litz, Jane Austen: A Study of her Artistic Development) with Elinor and Marianne as first title like Maria Edgeworths Letters of Julia and Caroline (1795).
Austen shows that Marianne has sense and Elinor
has sensibility so the traits are mixed. Real tension not here but in instability of individual and society which requires stability. Individual energy runs up against fixed social structures (Marianne, Willoughby, Elinor, Brandon and others Eliza?) Freuds Civilisation and its Discontents (1930). He shows how the individual must constantly constrain and control him or herself and give up basic drives (in French pulsions) in order to benefit from civilisation and culture. Men and women do this but are left with a sort of rage and dissatisfaction which erupts from time to time in history in violent anti-social and barbaric ways. Sexual licence, greed and physical violence are sublimated into work, building of society but can surface, untamed, at any time. Think of the ways this happens in Sense and Sensibility (Willoughby, Mrs. Ferrars, Robert Ferrars, Fanny Dashwood, Lucy Steele and in its most primal version: the Eliza story). Neat geometry of plot (juxtaposed couples: Elinor and Marianne moving towards desirable happy marriage with Ferrars and Brandon. But this is complicated by unscrupulous Lucy and Willoughby. Harmony of first two couples against false happiness of Lucy and Robert/ Willoughby and wife/ John and Fanny). Austen helps us to appreciate the value of the real thing by juxtaposing a travesty or parodic version of it (Tanner 79) The clear resolution at the end is clouded by much SECRECY and SICKNESS What secrets?: Come, come, lets have no secrets among friends cries Mrs. Jennings but secrets are everywhere! Secrets Colonel Brandon must cancel the Whitwell outing Lucys secret engagement (only told to Elinor to silence her as a potential rival) its always been a great secret) Willoughbys secret plan to marry Miss Grey it was no longer to be a secret Game of secret relationships is entertainment. Sir John plays with Elinor His name is Ferrars, said he..but pray do not tell it, for its a great secret BUT more than this perhaps secrecy of self, what is not expressed. What is within the self and not shared Restraints and suppressions to protect the innermost feelings. Strange kind of secrecy maintained by Marianne and Willoughby or by Marianne in London even from Elinor a privacy that eluded all her watchfulness. Elinor on hearing of Edwards engagement manages a composure of voice under which was concealed an emotion and distress beyond anything she had ever felt before. Brandon says that concealment () is all that remains concerning his love for Marianne. Many, many phrases with ill-judged secrecy or the appearence of secrecy Secrets of private self from society or from ones entourage. Self-survival can count on it. Cruel, coercitive powers of society (Tanner 81) like John Dashwood and his and Mrs. Ferrars desire to stop marriage of Lucy and Robert Elinor is a repository of other peoples secrets with no one to tell her own So secrecy can be imposed, be a necessity, or a strategy Illness, sickness All secrets resolved at end, but before this Marianne is very sick. Traced very carefully by Austen so that we find language of symtomology and diagnosis: melancholy, wholly dispirited over fatigues, almost catatonic without stirring..altering her attitude screamed with agony, faint and giddy starved, general nervous faintness, hysterical. She contracts a fever which nearly kills her. Doctor says putrid tendency, stupor Psychosomatic and pathological: almost a madness. Cowper, Mariannes favourite poet went mad in real life. Foucault shows in Madness and Civilisation great increase in nervous diseases in 18thc. Foucault shows that English in 18thc believed madness could come easily after stress or a shock. Nation of stressed merchants, individualism which meant isolation. Michel Foucalt in Histoire de la Folie tries to explain increase in nervous disorders. He says English saw demands of social life as being detrimental to health and nature was a remedy with its gentle laws. Elinor tries this with Marianne in chapter 16. So connection with the early Romantic movement and a unironic excess (Tanner 84). Marianne suffers from what Foucault as a historian calls interiority of passion and unfulfilled desire, break with the immediate. Marianne fights against a society of forms (social structures, need for appearences, the use of screens of which one is lies). For Marianne forms are falsity, social masquerade. Marianne does not observe the forms. She is a person of sensibility who cannot bear Lady Middleton (pure form with empty interior). Marianne says nothing when Lucy praises Lady Middleton. Elinor has the task of telling lies when politeness required it. Marianne wants to annihilate the forms that restrain her and construct her social world (See again Freuds Civilisation and its Discontents). Society maintained by necessary lies. But Marianne refuses this. Pure sincerity and projection outwards of inward feelings. Austen knows that society cannot function like this. Willoughby seems Romantic and daring slighting too easily the forms of worldly propriety in Elinors sober eyes. Tanner says he readily abandons his passionate sincerities to secure wealth and social position which will maintain him in his idleness and self-indulgence (Tanner 85). Both he and Marianne live at the expense of other people (Marianne is sincere but needs Elinor to cover up for her. Elinor paints screens in the novel literally and metaphorically). Veneer of art. Marianne openly shows her anger when Mrs Ferrars despises these screens so Austen encourages appreciation of both the maker of screens and the discarder of screens (Tanner 85) See Virginia Woolfs idea of screen-making habit of the human personality which preserves our sanity. Need to shut people off. Without it we might perhaps dissolve utterly; separateness would be impossible (Woolf wanted also to break down the screens and see real connections but knew they were necessary). Tanner says at the heart of S&S is the following question: how much of the individuals inner world should be allowed to break out in the interests of personal vitality and psychic health; and how much should the external world be allowed to coerce and control that inner reality (86) Attachment and affection is a personal act while engagement is social and public. Elinor says to her mother I want no proof of their affection () of their engagement I do. Scream of Marianne in London is a scream against the forms and structures which surround her. A bodily expression of the strictures which contain her. Austen shows with this scream the secret sickness of many people as they struggle against their desires and instincts to fit into civilisation.(See Civilisation and its Discontents/Malaise dans la civilisation) Mariannes cry is also a sort of giving up of her autonomy a cry of defeat. Essay: Secrecy Introduction: What are the connotations of the word? Unfold its different meanings (historically and in contemporary usage). Where can we position Austen in terms of the notion of secrecy (brief explanation)? What will the dissertation demonstrate about secrecy in Sense and Sensibility? (problmatique). I wish to show that Main body of the essay: Parts 1, 2, 3 Conclusion