Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
(Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Tan Choong Kuang & Anor (1986] 1 MLJ 390 .
There is a distinction between an agreement and a contract. The
word "contract" has at times been loosely used in the past.
We are used to the English common law which does not make the
distinction between the two terms as our section 2 of the Contracts
Act.
An agreement is defined in s 2(e) as "every promise and every set
promises, forming the consideration for each other,“ i.e., when the
parties have made mutual promises to each other, there is an
agreement.
However, not all agreements are enforceable. Section 2(g)
provides "an agreement not enforceable by law is said to be void."
While s2 (h) provides that "an agreement enforceable by law" is a
contract.
The distinction between an agreement and a valid,
binding enforceable contract is provided for in s 10 of
the Contracts Act.
“All agreements are contracts if they are made by
the free consent of competent to contract, for a
lawful consideration and with a lawful object and
are not hereby expressly declared to be void.”
It is foundational to contractual obligations, giving rise to the
concepts of freedom and sanctity of contract.
Freedom of contract means that a person is free to enter into
contracts with any party and agree to the terms of any bargain.
Sanctity of a contract binds both parties to the contract freely
entered into.
S 13 provides that "two or more persons are said to consent
when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense".
The factors invalidating consent are coercion, undue influence,
fraud and misrepresentation (ss15,16.17,18) and mistake
(ss21,22,23).
When consent to an agreement is caused by any of these factors,
the agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party
whose consent was so caused.
A voidable contract is defined in s 2(i) as "an agreement which is
enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties thereto, but
not at the option of the other or others". The innocent party is given an
option whether to terminate/rescind or to continue/affirm the contract.
Competency to contract
The competency of parties to enter into contracts is another
important element to the enforceability of contracts.
S11 provides that “every person is competent to contract who is
of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject,
and who is of sound mind (s12), is not disqualified from
contracting by any law to which he is subject".
The age of majority is 18 years (Section 2 Age of Majority Act
1971, Act 21), and the soundness of mind for the purposes of
contracting is provided in s12. The law ensures persons of full
capacity are responsible for and are bound by law their actions.