Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
References:
ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003
I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004
Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US 1
www.ITEinc.US
Agenda
1. Purpose
2. History of NAVSEA Physics Based Design
(PBD) Tools
3. CAD-Physics History:
• Integration
• Design Applications
• HSI Applications
4. Crafting a Design Environment to support
SECNAV, NAVSEA & CNET Objectives
5. Capture all validated models for HSI reuse
6. Way Ahead
2
www.ITEinc.US
1. Purpose
3
www.ITEinc.US
Purpose
• To share ITE 8 year history of working with NAVSEA to develop:
– Physics Based Design Tools
– Integration of Physics Tools with 2D-3D CAD Tools
– Reuse of validated physics model to support HSI
– ICAS support
– DDG-1000 Design Tools
• Support NAVSEA objectives for managing ship design: use concurrent V&V
– Support DoD – SECNAV Policy: Simulation Based Acquisition
4
www.ITEinc.US
2. History of NAVSEA Physics Based
Design (PBD) Tools
5
www.ITEinc.US
Simsmart “Physics” analysis was competitively
selected by NAVSEA in 1996 is a multi-discipline
Physics Based Design (PBD) tool for HM&E process
and control systems:
• Liquids
• Gases
• HVAC
• AC/DC electrical generation and distribution
• Logic and analog machinery control systems
• Propulsion
6
www.ITEinc.US
Simsmart™ Physics Tool Overview
HMI
Run-Time
... www.ITEinc.US
Data Trend
8
Ship Modernization / HSI: Open the Model
Create & Validate the New Design HSI App.
12
www.ITEinc.US
3. CAD-Physics Development History:
a. Integration Sponsors:
* DDG-1000
* NSRP
b. Design Applications
c. HSI Applications
13
www.ITEinc.US
Design Tools to Improve Efficiency of Program Management and Human Systems Integration Rev 5
Compiled by ITE Inc 2007 www.ITEinc.US (print 11 x 17 or larger)
Executive
Summary 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
CNET : Task Force Excel 2005 – 2007 ANZAC Frigate Total
Navy Training CNO ADM Clark VADM Lee Gunn Report
http://www.uscg.mil/TCYORKTOWN/PTC/downloads/TFE.
ppt
Ship HME&DC Model
Revolution in Training w/ CNET: 5 Vector Model / Career Training &
Requirements ordered Executive To build careers / use Education from Ship Acquisition
NAVSESS $$ Premise: Use ship design
Review Navy Training Multi-Level Metrics … thru Ship Lifecycle
AC Unit Model
(ERNT) for ICAS tools to support ship design
430 Has BFTT CS SIM-STIM; BTSWG Mtgs
NAVSESS $$ Virtual “Hot / program managers during
PMS 430 BFTT HPAC Model Plant” and all phases of design, trials
New NAVSEA VADM Balisle
Observes Needs HM&E & DC SIM-STIM 1st Demo/Model delivered Notional CG SBIR for ICAS OBT
I/ITSEC 2001 International BFTT Ph 2 Ends Re-org NAVSEA IWS-1E Rick Virtual “Hot and tests, permitting IV&V
SIMSMART™ Physics Model of notional monitoring the designs and
Demo Tactical & Eng, DC via Bragg. All new contracts. Plant” and
Ship Model at SNAME WAN U.S. U.K.-Aus.- “CG” Staff change over. OBT HSI objectives in progress,
Netherlands.
DSR SBIR Contract Mod to SBIR Phase 2
linked to corresponding
add Simsmart HM&E-DC model
OAK added to SBIR
BFTT CS / CAD drawings. Physics –
HM&E and DC DSR / Simsmart IWS-1E math models (basis of
First Real Time BFTT?
Model / OAK contracts
I/ITSEC 2000, see DCAMS at cascading casualties
demonstrated end
design), now “lost”, are
BFTT booth, Recommend join for damage and Capt Shannon
SBIR Joe Loudon captured for reuse for:
HM&E / repair tied to
BFTT CS, using Mar 2002:Directed Demo for
Distance Support,
CNSF VADM Tim LaFleur observes EOSS / EOCC /
VADM LaFleur & Staff @ SD TSTC ICD Drafted … Effort Performance Monitoring,
BFTT / Simsmart Demo @ SNA 2002 CSOSS CoC CNSF stopped with NAVSEA Reorg. Readiness Assessment,
SNA 2002 RADM Terry
Had tasked Staff in Etnyre Operational Decision Aids
2000 to Report 2003 ASNE
status / Tech 2004 for DC and Engineering, and
Ship Models for Training from requirements for @ SBIR 2002 CNSF:
Paper: I/TSEC future ShipAlt planning.
“Achieve Tech
Ship Design Validation Tools CNSF training See Can you provide CD Draft DOP
Paper “A
Also support advanced
CNSF PPT Jan and ROI HSI
for “A” School Total dynamic interactive training
2002 provided through
Sailors per ERNT? Ship –
HM&E dynamic design validation tools
Yes. for CNSF Design” ashore and afloat, as well as
acquired by BIW & Ingalls for Modeling LHD-8 Crew
DD21 (DDX);by Avondale for PD17; by Modeling Model to
to provide the underlying
Ingalls for CG47 Mod; Gibbs & Cox, for SEA- Achieve computations to teach
JJMA and NAVSEA etc. 05D . CSC HSI” students how and why
NAVSEA National Shipbuilding Research NSRP $$ to NSRP $$ to NSRP $$ to systems work – prepare
Program (NSRP), Increase US - international Simsmart to Simsmart Simsmart to them for critical thinking,
Competitive Capability with an Advanced integrate with integrate with 3/05 GAO Report 05-183: findings include
to integrate with … ship design incomplete before college work, etc.
Shipbuilding Enterprise (ASE) & Processes CATIA CAD for AutoCAD (Ship Intergraph CAD
Dynamic Validation for Dynamic production causing cost over run &
Constructor) for deficient systems. Also see INSURV MSG:
Dynamic Validation Validation
LPD 17 is Navy’s First attempt at full PREINSURV Norfolk VA 181811Z July 05
digital design incorporating CAD and LPD17: 11 Vital Fluid systems LPD-17 Incomplete …
Physics Dynamic Validation, Selects validated with models for
SIMSMART™ via competition Ingalls FSO CG 47 LCS Ships (did not use dynamic design validation = no model)
NAVSEA. HVAC & Electrical not
validated Mod dynamic
design Validation /
DD21 Program CATIA CAD + Ingalls sells idea
Model: OAK e-DCAMS OAK DCTMS
Simsmart Physics for Design to DD21 Alliance DCAMS •Electrical Plant
Validation & Navy NAVSEA O5L4 13K Objects
Program DD21 Dies DD(X) obtains DDG1000 Simsmart Physics
•Firemain 4K
BIW/ Ingalls Together = DD21 Alliance Objective DD(X) begins CATIA- Raytheon Phase 4 of DD(X) to CATIA V5 Revs 15, 16, 17
Objects
Memorandum SIMSMART™ … continues
Both select Simsmart via Competition •Chill Water 4K Katrina Flood Damage
(POM) 5 years Objects NGSS wins integration in
Engineers at Ingalls scope CAD & dynamic System of again, as Dec 04 for
Design Validation using physics models Record: Design Dynamic
Budget line NGSS Protest Agent Validation of Replace Dongle license plugs for SIMSMART™
DDX wins
Starts DDX
Fluid and HVAC
(Electrical TBD)
DDX Dynamic Validation and Integration to Continue
14
www.ITEinc.US
4. Crafting a Design Environment to support
SECNAV / NAVSEA / CNET Objectives
15
www.ITEinc.US
Design Continuum Overview
Future
Modernization
Construction
Detail
Design Ship Operates
Contract
Design
Preliminary
Design
Tests & Trials -
RDT&E -
Commissioning
Conceptual
Design
Continuous CAD = Does it “Fit”?
Requirements SD/PM’s IV&V Virtual Ship Model
Continuous PBD* = Does it “Work”?
Integrated Ship Design Tools Spiral Design Tests & Trials Deliver HSI Lifecycle
CAD:
It Fits Electrical Fluid Gas HVAC Controls DC
NAVSEA Technical
Physics:
It Works, in
real-time Total Ship
Model
Will ship’s HM&E PEO Ships
CAD &
plant support ship & Physics by
all missions / Deck
modules dynamically
thru all scenarios? All Systems Work Together 18
www.ITEinc.US
ANZAC TPTS Propulsion Systems
19
www.ITEinc.US
Summary: Applications of Multi-Discipline Physics-based Design Tools
• SECNAV – NAVSEA Shipbuilding Objectives:
• Demonstrate dynamic “performance” during RDT&E and all design phases
– System to total ship level
• Demonstrate Mission and HSI Performance Requirements
• Eliminate Risk
• Reduce Costs
• Model can be used as the specification
• Model can be re-used for all HSI Lifecycle Support Applications
• Mature tools: 19 year development to TLR-9
• 19 years Support to NAVSEA, Shipbuilders and Marine Engineering Companies
– Numerous ship design programs (see slide)
• Integration of CAD-Physics under NSRP - ASE Phase II:
– CATIA, ShipConstructor, Intergraph
• Demonstrated HSI Applications needed by CNET:
– SBIR Total Ship Model for Training (BFTT CS with HME&DC model
» real time cascading damage and recovery
• Captures all physics models (basis of design) as well as the CAD
• Currently Builder delivers only drawings, none of the “math” (intellectual property)
• ASNE-SNAME technical papers 2003-4: continuous IV&V
• Recommended all designs use continuous IV&V (Highlighted LCS program)
• Resulting Validated Ship Model Supports the Full Ship Lifecycle
• Training
• Decision Aids
• Modernization
• Distance Support / SORTS 20
www.ITEinc.US
5. Example of applying validated models:
21
www.ITEinc.US
TRL-8 and 9 Applications
Physics Based Design to Human Systems Integration
• Distance Support
22
www.ITEinc.US
Imperative Requirement for Validated HM&E Models
23
www.ITEinc.US
PMS430 – BFTT - Total Ship Training & Operational Decision Aids Architecture
Debrief
BOPC
Scenario Generation
Products
& Control
DATA
Performance STOW LAN COLLECTION LAN
Monitoring,
Training &
USN & Coalition Combat Systems Training
Assessment
TPTS IT21 SWAN & 2-Way Wireless LAN
Platform Simulation
IT21 LAN /
SWAN
Two-way
Wearable
Trainer Computers
DCAMS
Trainee
Training
Flags
Trainer
Ground
Truth Trainee
Perceived
Truth Perceived
Truth
25
www.ITEinc.US
Total Ship Training (TST) Integrated Continuum
BFTT TSTS
Benefits:
• Full Fidelity at-Sea Individual and Team Training Same
• “Training more relevant and more motivating at Models
sea” (SNA 2002) “Scaled”
Validated HMEC&DC Ship Systems Dynamic Models Created During Ship Design or From Ship Design
Data for Legacy Ships 26
www.ITEinc.US
Application Across Training Continuum
(Revolution in Training and Task Force Excel Concept)
Enroute Training
ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003
I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004 28
Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US www.ITEinc.US
One Design-HSI Process Supports NAVSEA & CNET Requirements
Integrated Ship Design Tools Spiral Design Tests & Trials Deliver HSI Lifecycle
Way Ahead?
References:
ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003
I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004
Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US 30
www.ITEinc.US
Mission Effectiveness by Developing & Re-Applying Validated Simulation Models
1. Basic Principles observed and Lowest Level of Technology Readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and
reported. development. Examples might include paper studies of a technology’s basic properties.
2. Technology concept and/or Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are
application formulated. speculative and there is no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to
analytic studies.
3. Analytical and experimental Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to
critical functions and/or physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include
characteristic proof of concept. components that are not yet integrated or representative.
4. Component and/or Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively “low
breadboard validation in fidelity” compared to the eventual system. Examples include integration of “ad hoc” hardware in laboratory.
laboratory environment.
5. Component and/or Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated
breadboard validation in relevant with reasonably realistic supporting elements so that it can be tested in a simulated environment. Examples
environment. include “high fidelity” laboratory integration of components.
6. System/subsystem model or Representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond TRL 5, is tested in a relevant environment.
prototype demonstration in a Represents a major step up in technology’s demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing a prototype in a
relevant environment. high fidelity laboratory environment, or in a simulated operational environment.
7. System prototype Prototype near, or at, planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring
demonstration in an operational demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment, such as an aircraft, vehicle, or
environment. space. Examples include testing the prototype in a test bed aircraft.
8. Actual system completed and Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, TRL
“flight qualified” through test and represents the end of the true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluation of
demonstration. the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets design specifications.
9. Actual system “flight proven” Actual Application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered
through successful mission in operational test and evaluation. In almost all cases, this is the end of the last “bug fixing” aspects of system
operations. development. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions.
32
www.ITEinc.US