Department of Civil Engineering

Presentation On
A Comparative Study on Structural
Parameter Of RCC and Composite
Structures
Presented By

BASAVARAJ S (1NH14CV015)
LAKSHMI KANTH (1NH14CV022)
HEMANTH D R (1NH14CV040)
LAKSHMAN K (1NH14CV055)

Under The Guidance Of

Mr. Sandeep T D
 CONTENTS

➢ INTRODUCTION
➢ OBJECTIVES
➢ METHODOLOGY
➢ SCOPE OF STUDY
➢ LITERATURE REVIEW
➢ REFERENCES
➢ OUTCOME OF THE PROJECT

2
 INTRODUCTION
• Composite material : It consisting of two or more materials which
are physically distinct and mechanically they can be separable,
however constituents should combine in controlled way to achieve
optimum properties.
• Steel and concrete are the two best and most versatile
construction material available , amongst which concrete got high
strength, fire resistant, easily place able, economic and aesthetic.
And steel has high strength, high speed of construction and also
has environment benefits like green buildings can easily
constructed.
• Bringing these materials together we can enhance the properties
of both material.
• Integrated composite structure is formed when we use composite
slabs, composite beams and composite column all together in a
structure.

3
 COMPOSITE COLUMN
Types:
1. Fully encased
2. Partially encased
3. Concrete filled

Connections:
1.Foundation To Column 2.Column To Column
 COMPOSITE BEAM
It consists of a steel beam, over which a reinforced concrete slab
is cast with shear connectors.

5
COMPOSITE DECK SLAB

6
 OBJECTIVES
● Generation of RCC and composite 3D building models of different height
30 storey, 40 storey and 50 storey
● To fix the preliminary dimension of component.

● To evaluate these building models under static and dynamic analysis that
are designed for different load combinations as given in IS Code.
● Comparative study of structural parameters like base shear, natural
frequency, displacement and axial forces of the RCC and composite
buildings
● To study the code requirements.

● Identify the performance of the structure.

7
 METHODOLOGY
● Finite Element Modelling of RCC and composite frames are considered.

● Validation of Finite element Model is done and comparing results with

journal paper.
● Equivalent static method and dynamic analysis is used for models using
software.
● Results are considered for comparative study.
● Comparative study involves base shear, mode shape, natural
frequency, seismic forces and behaviour of the building under seismic
condition.
● After finding all structural parameter the best solution for high rise
structure is decided.

8
 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

• Understanding the composite structure behaviour.

• Understanding the composite Beam model, RCC beam model, RCC

column and composite column model and slab and deck slab model.

• Understanding the design of composite beam, RCC beam and RCC

column, composite column.

• Analysing the 3D model of RCC and composite structure by soft-ware.

9
 LITERTATURE REVIEW
• D. R. Panchal: Comparative Study of R.C.C, Steel and Composite
(G+30 Storey) Building.

• Anish N. Shah: Comparison Of R.C.C. and Composite Multi-

storeyed Buildings.

• D. R. Panchal: Steel-Concrete Composite Building Under Seismic

Forces.

• Valdemar: Numerical analysis of steel-reinforced concrete composite

girders.

• Mahbuba Begum: Cost analysis of steel concrete composite

structures in Bangladesh.
10
 REFERENCES
● IS-456: 2000, “Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced
Concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
● IS-1893- Part I: 2002, “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
● IS-875 (Part I), “Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake)
for Buildings and Structures (Second Revision), Dead Loads — Unit
Weights of Building Materials and Stored Materials”, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi
● IS-875 (Part II), “Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake)
for Buildings and Structures (Second Revision), Imposed Loads”, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi
● IS-875 (Part III), “Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake)
for Buildings and Structures (Second Revision), Wind Loads”, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi

11
 OUTCOME
• The composite option is better than R.C.C. Because Composite
option for high rise building is best suited. Weight of composite
structure is quite low as compared to RCC structure which helps in
reducing the foundation cost.
• It is clear that the nodal displacements in a composite structure, by
both the methods of seismic analysis, compared to an R.C.C.
structure in all the three global directions are less which is due to the
higher stiffness of members in a composite structure compared to
an RCC structure.
• Composite structures are more economical than that of RCC
structure. Composite structures are the best solution for high rise
structure as compared to RCC structure. Speedy construction
facilitates quicker return on the invested capital and benefits in terms
of rent.
• The maximum shear force in composite beam is less compared to
RCC beam.

12
Thank You !!! 13