Employee welfare

• DATA COLLECTION METHOD

• Primary Source of Data
• Primary data is known as the data collected fro the first time through field survey. Such data are collected with specific set of objectives to assess the current status of any variable studied.
• RESEARCH INSTRUMENT:
• In this project, the data were collected through structured questionnaire.
• QUESTIONNAIRE
• A questionnaire is a schedule consisting of a number of coherent and formulated series of question related to the various aspects of the under study. In this method a pre – printed list of question arranged
in sequence is used to elicit response from the important.
• Types of questions
• The following are the types of questions, which are used in research. They are:
• Open ended question
• Close ended question
• a) Open ended questionnaire:
• An open-ended question gives the respondents complete freedom to decide the form length and detail of the form.
•
• b) Close ended questionnaire:
• The close-ended question is of two types they are as follows:
• Dichotomous question

• This type has only tow answers in the form of “YES” or “NO”, “TRUE” or “FALSE” etc…
•
 • Multiple – choice question.

• In this case the respondents are offered two or mores choices and the respondent have to indicate which is applicable in the following cases.
•
• STATISTICAL TOOLS APPLIED
• Percentage Analysis
• Weighted Average
• One-way ANOVA
•
• PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS:
• Percentage refers to a special kind of ratio. Percentage analysis test is done to find out the percentage of the response of the respondents. In these tool various percentage are presented by the way of Bar-diagram, Pie
charts in order to have better understanding of the analysis.
•
• FORMULA:
• Number of respondents
• Percentage = ------------------------------------------------ × 100
• Total number of respondent
• WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
•
• Mean in which each item being averaged is multiplied by a number (weight) based on the item's relative importance. The result is summed and the total is divided by the sum of the weights. Weighted averages
are used extensively in descriptive statistical analysis such as index numbers. Also called weighted mean.
• Under the one-way ANOVA, we consider only one factor and then
observe that the reason for said factor to be important is that several
possible types of samples can occur within that factor .
• Analysis of varience table for one-way ANOVA
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

SOURCES OF SUM OF DEGREES OF MEAN SQUARE F-RATIO

VARIATION SQUARES FREEDOM

BETWEEN n1 (X1-X)2 +…+ (k-1) SS BETWEEN MS BETWEEN

SAMPLES nk(Xk-X)2 (k-1) MS WITHIN

WITHIN SAMPLES ∑(Xij-X)2+….+ (n-k) SS WITHIN

∑(Xki-Xk)2 (n-k)

TOTAL ∑(Xij-X)2
(n-1)
i=1,2,…
j=1,2..
AGE GROUP OF THE RESPONDENTS

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

AGE NO.OF.RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE(%)

<20 YRS 0 -
21-25 YRS 27 25
26-35 YRS 45 41
36-50 YRS 29 26
>50 YRS 9 8
TOTAL 110 100
 AGE PERCENTAGE
45
41
40

35

30
26
25
25

20

15

10 8

-
-
<20 YRS 21-25 YRS 26-35 YRS 36-50 YRS >50 YRS
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table, it is inferred that, 41% of respondents belongs
to 26-35 years, 26% of the respondents belongs to 36-50 years,25 %
of respondents belongs to 21-25 years , and 8% of the respondents
belongs to above 50 years, 0% of respondents belongs to less than 20
years
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

GENDE NO OF
R RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE(%)

MALE 74 67
FEMAL
E 36 33

TOTAL 110 100

 GENDER

67
70

60
50
40
33
30
20
10
0

MALE

FEMALE
•
• INFERENCE: From the above table it is inferred that out of 110
respondents, 67% were Male and 33% were Female.
•
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

EDUCATION NO.OF.RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE(%)

DEGREE/DIPLOMA 65 60

POSTGRADUATE 39 35

OTHERS 6 5

TOTAL 110 100

 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
70

60
60

50

40
35

30

20

10
5

0
DEGREE/DIPLOMA POSTGRADUATE OTHERS
• INFERENCE: From the table ,it was inferred that 60% of respondents
fall in the category of Degree/Diploma,35% of respondents fall in the
category of Post graduate, 5% of respondents fall in the category of
Others.
•
YEARS OF SREVICE OF THE RESPONDENTS

YEARS OF SERVICE NO.OF.RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE(%)

1-5 YRS 24 22
6-10 YRS 43 39
11-20 YRS 33 30
ABOVE 20 YRS 10 9
TOTAL 110 100
 YEARS OF SERVICE

40 39
35
30
22 30
25
20
15
10
5
0
9
1-5 YRS
6-10 YRS

11-20 YRS

ABOVE 20 YRS
•
• INFERENCE: From the above table it is inferred that 39% of
respondents have 6-10 yrs experience, 30% of respondents have 11-
20 yrs experience, 22% of respondents have 1-5 yrs experience,9% of
respondents have above 20 yrs experience.
•
MONTHLY INCOME OF THE RESPONDENTS

MONTHLY INCOME NO.OF.RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE(%)

10000-20000 17 15.45
20001-30000 37 33.64
30001-40000 42 38.18
40001-50000 14 12.73
>50000 0 0
TOTAL 110 100
 MONTHLY INCOME
45.00

40.00 38.18

35.00 33.64

30.00

25.00

20.00
15.45
15.00 12.73

10.00

5.00

0
0.00
10000-20000 20001-30000 30001-40000 40001-50000 >50000
• INFERENCE: From the above table it was inferred that 38.18% of
respondents are having income 30001-40000/month, 33.64% of
respondents are having income 20001-30000/month, 15.45% of
respondents are having income 10000-20000/month, 12.73% of
respondents are having income 40001-50000/month and 0% of
respondents having income above 50000/month.
AWARENESS ABOUT VARIOUS WELFARE MEASURES OF THE ORGANISATION

AWARENESS OF
VARIOUS WELFARE NO.OF.RESPONDENT
MEASURES S PERCENTAGE(%)

YES 80 72.73

NO 30 27.27

TOTAL 110 100

 AWARENESS OF WELFARE MEASURES

72.73
80.00

60.00

40.00
27.27
20.00

0.00

YES

NO
• INFERENCE: From the above table it is inferred that 72.73% were
aware of various welfare measures provided by the company and
27.27% were not aware of various welfare measures provided by the
company.
RATING OF FACILITY BENEFITS

Facilities 1 Percentage (%) 2 percentage(%) 3 Percentage ( %) 4 Percentage(%) 5 percentage (%)

Medical 50 45.45 39 35.45 7 6.64 6 5.45 8 7.27
Education 29 26.36 50 45.45 19 17.27 7 6.36 5 4.55
Housing 24 21.82 28 25.45 40 36.36 8 7.27 10 9.09
Traveling 12 10.91 13 11.82 26 23.64 20 18.18 39 35.55
Recreation 13 11.82 14 12.73 28 25.45 33 30 22 20
Total 110 100 110 100 110 100 110 100 110 100
50.00

45.00

40.00

35.00

30.00 MEDICAL
EDUCATION
25.00
HOUSING
TRAVELLING
20.00
RECREATION
15.00

10.00

5.00

0.00
1 2 3 4 5
• INFERENCE:
• From this table it is inferred that 45.45% of the respondents rated
medical facility as the first most benefitted facility, 45.45% of the
respondents rated educational facility as the second most benefitted
facility, 36.36% of the respondents rated housing facility as the third
most benefitted facility, 25.45% of the respondents rated recreation
facility as the fourth most benefitted facility and 35.45% of the
respondents rated travelling facility as the fifth most benefitted
facility.
•
SATISFACTION LEVEL TOWARDS MEDICAL FACILITIES PROVIDED

MEDICAL HIGHLY HIGHLY

FACILITIES SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED DISSATISFIED TOTAL
ROUTINE CHK
UP 27 56 16 7 4 110
PERCENT(%) 24.55 50. 91 14. 55 6.36 3.63 100
FIRST AID 13 55 32 4 6 110
PERCENT(%) 11. 82 50 29.09 3.63 5.45 100
MEDICINE
SUPPLIED 18 60 25 3 4 110
PERCENT(%) 16.36 54. 55 22. 73 2.72 3.63 100
AMBULANCE
SERVICE 14 54 32 5 5 110
PERCENT(%) 12. 73 49. 09 29. 09 4.54 4.54 100
60

50

40

ROUTINE CHK UP

30 FIRST AID
MEDICINE SUPPLIED
AMBULANCE SERVICE
20

10

0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that for routine check up 24.55 % of the
respondents are highly satisfied, 50.91 % of the respondents are satisfied, 14.55
% of the respondents are neutral, 6.36 % of the respondents are Dissatisfied and
3.63 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, for First aid 11.82 % of the
respondents are highly satisfied, 50 % of the respondents are satisfied, 29.09% of
the respondents are neutral, 3.63 % of the respondents are Dissatisfied and 5.45
% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, for medicine supplied 16.36 % of the
respondents are highly satisfied, 54.55 % of the respondents are satisfied, 22.72
% of the respondents are neutral, 2.72 % of the respondents are Dissatisfied and
3.63 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, For Ambulance service 12.73 %
of the respondents are highly satisfied, 49.09 % of the respondents are satisfied,
29.09 % of the respondents are neutral, 4.55 % of the respondents are
Dissatisfied and 4.55 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
 TABLE 2.1.11
OVERALL SATISFACTION TOWARDS EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

SATISFIED PERCENTAGE
OVERALL NO.OF.RESPONDENTS (%)
YES 97 88.18
NO 13 11. 82
TOTAL 110 100
 OVERALL SATISFACTION OF
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
100.00

88.18
90.00

80.00

70.00

60.00

50.00

40.00

30.00

20.00
11.82
10.00

0.00
YES NO
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that 88.18% of respondents are
satisfied with the overall educational facility provided and 11.82% of
the respondents are not satisfied with the overall educational facility.
SATISFACTION LEVEL TOWARDS CANTEEN FACILITIES

HIGHLY HIGHLY
CANTEEN SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED DISSATISFIED TOTAL
QUALITY OF
FOOD 17 66 17 5 5 110
PERCENT(%) 15.45 60 15.45 4.54 4.54 100
QUANTITY OF
FOOD 14 63 27 6 0 110
PERCENT(%) 12.73 57.27 24.55 5.45 0 100
PRICE 17 60 26 6 1 110
PERCENT(%) 15.45 54.55 23.64 5.45 0.9 100
70

60

50

40
QUALITY OF FOOD
QUANTITY OF FOOD
30 PRICE

20

10

0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that for quality of food 15.45 % of the
respondents are highly satisfied, 60% of the respondents are satisfied,
15.45 % of the respondents are neutral, 4.54 % of the respondents are
Dissatisfied and 4.54 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, for
quantity of food 12.73 % of the respondents are highly satisfied, 57.27% of
the respondents are satisfied, 24.55% of the respondents are neutral, 5.45
% of the respondents are Dissatisfied and 0 % of the respondents are
highly dissatisfied, for price of the food 15.45 % of the respondents are
highly satisfied, 54.54 % of the respondents are satisfied, 23.64 % of the
respondents are neutral, 5.45 % of the respondents are Dissatisfied and
0.90 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied
OVERALL SATISFACTION LEVEL TOWARDS CANTEEN FACILITIES

OVERALL
SATISFACTIO PERCENTAGE(
N NO.OF.RESPONDENTS %)

YES 87 79.09

NO 23 20. 91
OVERALL SATISFACTION OF
CANTEEN FACILITIES

20.91

YES
NO

79.09
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that 79.09% of respondents are
satisfied with the overall canteen facility provided and 20.91% of the
respondents are not satisfied with the overall canteen facility.
PERSONS AVAILING HOUSING LOANS:

PERCENTAGE(%
AVAILING HOUSING LOAN NO.OF.RESPONDENTS )

YES 78 70. 91

NO 32 29. 09

TOTAL 110 100

 AVAILING HOUSING LOAN

29.09

YES
NO

70.91
•
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that 70.91% of the respondents are
availing housing loan and 29.09 % of the respondents are not availing
housing loan.
SATISFACTION TOWARDS HOUSING FACILITY:

SATISFIED HOUSING NO.OF.RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE(%)

YES 62 56.36

NO 48 43.64
TOTAL 110 100
 SATISFACTION TOWARDS
HOUSING FACILITY

43.64
YES
NO
56.36
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that 56.36% of respondents are
satisfied with the housing facility provided and 43.64% of the
respondents are not satisfied with the housing facility provided.
RECREATION FACILITY THAT VALUES MOST:

NO OF
RECREATION RESPONDEN PERCENT
FACILITY TS AGE(%)
HOLIDAY
HOMES 70 63. 64
CLUBS 26 23. 64
SPORTS
EVENTS 14 12.72

TOTAL 110 100

 RECREATION THAT BENEFITS MOST

12.73

23.64

63.64
HOLIDAY HOMES
CLUBS
SPORTS EVENTS
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that 63.64 % of the respondents
values Holiday Homes as beneficial,23.64% of the respondents values
clubs as beneficial recreation and 12.73 % of the respondents values
sports events as a beneficial recreation .
•
RATING FOR INTRAMURAL FACILITIES

FACILITIES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TOTAL
DRINKING WATER 66 16 14 5 4 1 2 2 0 0 110
60 14 12
.0 .5 .7 4. 3. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 100
PERCENTAGE% 0 5 3 55 64 91 82 82 00 00

SEATING ARRANGEMENTS 51 35 11 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 110

46 31 10
.3 .8 .0 1. 1. 2. 0. 1. 0. 1.
PERCENTAGE% 6 2 0 82 82 73 91 82 91 82 100

FIRST AID APPLIANCES 12 16 20 26 14 4 5 3 6 4 110

10 14 18 23 12
.9 .5 .1 .6 .7 3. 4. 2. 5. 3. 100
PERCENTAGE% 1 5 8 4 3 64 55 73 45 64

LATRINES&URINALS 5 12 20 25 15 15 5 9 0 4 110
10 18 22 13 13
4. .9 .1 .7 .6 .6 4. 8. 0. 3. 100
PERCENTAGE% 55 1 8 3 4 4 55 18 00 64

SPITTOONS 5 6 14 15 12 11 15 8 8 16 110
12 13 10 10 13 14
4. 5. .7 .6 .9 .0 .6 7. 7. .5 100
PERCENTAGE% 55 45 3 4 1 0 4 27 27 5
LIGHTING 45 18 13 10 13 2 5 1 1 2 110
40.9 16.3 11.8 11.8
PERCENTAGE% 1 6 2 9.09 2 1.82 4.55 0.91 0.91 1.82 100

WASHING PLACE 5 7 7 12 18 19 20 10 7 5 110

10.9 16.3 17.2 18.1
PERCENTAGE% 4.55 6.36 6.36 1 6 7 8 9.09 6.36 4.55 100

CHANGING ROOMS 2 10 3 5 9 10 17 27 14 13 110

15.4 24.5 12.7 11.8
PERCENTAGE% 1.82 9.09 2.73 4.55 8.18 9.09 5 5 3 2 100

REST ROOMS 3 7 5 6 8 10 9 20 23 19 110

18.1 20.9 17.2
PERCENTAGE% 2.73 6.36 4.55 5.45 7.27 9.09 8.18 8 1 7 100

CANTEEN 20 15 9 9 7 15 6 4 9 16 110
18.1 13.6 13.6 14.5
PERCENTAGE% 8 4 8.18 8.18 6.36 4 5.45 3.64 8.18 5 100
70.00

60.00

50.00 RANK 1
RANK 2
40.00
RANK 3
RANK 4
30.00
RANK 5

20.00 RANK 6
RANK 7
10.00 RANK 8
RANK 9
0.00
RANK 10
• INFERENCE:
• From this table it is inferred that 60% of the respondents rated first
for Drinking water ,31.82 % of the respondents rated second for
seating arrangement,11.82 % of the respondents rated third for
lighting,18.18% of the respondents rated fourth for first aid
appliances,13.64% of the respondents rated fifth for latrines &
urinals,13.64% of the respondents rated six forcanteen,18.18% of the
respondents rated seven for washing place,7.27% of the respondents
rated eight for spittoons,12.73% of the respondents rated nine for
changing rooms and 17.27% of the respondents rated ten for rest
rooms.
BENEFITS OF EMPLOYEE WELFARE

BENEFITS 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL

CREATS EFFICIENCY 58 30 5 7 10 110

PERCENTAGE(%) 52.72 27.27 4.54 6.36 9.09 100

IMP PHY& MENTAL

HEALTH 29 44 19 12 6 110
PERCENTAGE(%) 26.36 40 17.27 10.90 5.45 100

INCREASE STANDRD
OF LIVING 34 38 24 10 4 110
PERCENTAGE(%) 30.90 34.54 21.81 9.09 3. 64 100
LOYALTY TOWARDS
THE
WORK 27 33 14 21 15 110

PERCENTAGE(%) 24. 55 30 12.72 19.09 13.63 100

PROMOTE HEALTHY
IR 28 22 27 23 10 110

PERCENTAGE(%) 25.45 20 24. 55 20.90 9.09 100

60

50

40

CREATS EFFICIENCY
IMP PHY& MENTAL HEALTH
30
INCREASE STANDRD OF LIVING
LOYALTY TOWARDS THE WORK
PROMOTE HEALTHY IR
20

10

0
1 2 3 4 5
• INFERENCE:
• From this table it is inferred that for 52.73 % of respondents welfare
creates efficiency towards work,for 40% of the respondents welfare
improves Physical and Mental health, for 24.55% of the respondents
welfare promotes healthy Industrial relationship, for 19.09% of the
respondents welfare creates Loyalty towards the work and for 4% of
respondents welfare increases standard of living.
•
•
WELFARE PROVIDES MOTIVATION:

PERCENTAGE
MOTIVATIONAL FACTOR NO.ON RESPONDENTS (%)

YES 72 65.45

NO 38 34.55

TOTAL 110 100

 MOTIVATIONAL FACTOR

34.55

YES
NO

65.45
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that for 65.45% of respondents
welfare act as a motivational factor and for 34.55% of respondents
welfare is not acting as a motivational factor
•
FREQUENCY OF GETTING FEEDBACK:

FREQUENCY OF GETTING PERCENTAG

FEEDBACK NO.OF RESPONDENTS E(%)
OFTEN 20 18.18
OCCASIONALLY 74 67.27
NEVER 16 14.55
TOTAL 110 100
FREQUENCY OF GETTING FEEDBACK

14.55
18.18

OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
NEVER

67.27
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that 67.27% of respondents are
occasionally asked for the feedback about the welfare
measures,18.18% of respondents are often asked for the feedback
and 14.55 % of the respondents are never asked for the feedback.
•
MODE OF DETERMINING WELFARE REQUIREMENTS:

PERCENTAGE(
DETERMINING THROUGH NO.OF.RESPONDENTS %)
OBSERVATION 20 18.18
SUGGESTIONS 44 40.00
PERFORMANCE 37 33.64
INTERVIEW 9 8.18
TOTAL 110 100
 DETERMINING WELFARE REQUIREMENTS

8.18 18.18

33.64

OBSERVATION
40.00
SUGGESTIONS
PERFORMANCE
INTERVIEW
• INFERENCE:
• From the above table it is inferred that 18.18% the welfare
requirement is determined by observation, 40% the welfare
requirement is determined by suggestion, 8.18% the welfare is
determined by interview and 33.64% the welfare requirement is
determined by performance.
•
•
SATISFACTION OF OVERALL WELFARE MEASURES:

SATISFIED
WITH OVERALL PERCENTAGE
WELFARE MEASURES NO.OF.RESPONDENTS (%)
YES 72 65.45
NO 38 34.55
TOTAL 110 100
OVERALL SATISFACTION TOWARDS WELFARE MEASURES

34.55

YES
NO

65.45
• INFERENCE: From the above table it is inferred that 65.45% of the
respondents are satisfied with overall welfare measures provided and
34.55% of the respondents are not satisfied with overall welfare
measures provided.
•
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
• WEIGHTED AVERAGE
• AIM:
• To find out the employees opinion towards rating the various
Medical facilities
Satisfaction level towards various Medical facilities

X1Medical WX1 HighlyX2 satisfied

WX2 Neutral
X3 WX3 Dissatisfied
X4 Highly
WX4
facilities satisfied Dissatisfied
27 135 13 65 18 90 14 70
Routine 27 56 16 7 4
56
checkup(X1) 224 55 220 60 240 54 216
Rank 1 2 3 4 5
First
16 aid(X2) 48 13 32 55
96 25 32 75 4 32 696
Weight(W) 5 4 3 2 1
7
Medicine 14 18 4 8
60 3 25 6 3 5 410
Supplied(X3)
4 4 6 6 4 4 5 5
Ambulance 14 54 32 5 5
∑WX1=425 ∑WX2=395 ∑WX3=415 ∑WX4=397
service(X4)
•
• ∑W=(5+4+3+2+1)=15
• WEIGHTED AVERAGE=(∑WXi) / (∑W)
•
• WEIGHTED AVERAGE=(∑WXi) / (∑W)
• (Where i=1,2,3,4….)
• W1=425/15=28.33
• W2=395/15=26.33
• W3=415/15=27.67
• W4=397/15=26.47
MEDICAL FACILITIES WEIGHTED RANK
AVERAGE
Routine checkup 28.33 1

First aid 26.33 4

Medicine 27.67 2
Supplied
Ambulance service 26.47 3
• CONCLUSION:
• It is concluded that most of the respondents said that the company
provides the best routine check up facility to the respondents.
weightage given fro routine check up is 28.33, ,weightage given for
Medicine supplied is 27.67 ,weightage given for ambulance service is
26.47 and weightage given for first aid is 26.33
• AIM:
• To find out the employees opinion towards rating the various
Educational facilities
Satisfaction level towards various Educational facilities

X1
Educational WX1
Highly X2
satisfied WX2
Neutral X3
Dissatisfied WX3
Highly
facilities
33 satisfied
165 17 85 13 Dissatisfied
65
Reimburseme 33 56 15 5 1
56 224 57 228 57 228
nt ofRank
Tuition 1 2 3 4 5
15
Fee(X1) 45 29 87 28 84
Weight(W) 5 4 3 2 1
Scholarship(X
5 1017 657 1229 106 201
2)
1 1 1 1 2 2
Educational 13 57 28 10 2
loan (X3) ∑WX1=445 ∑WX2=413 ∑WX3=399
• ∑W=(5+4+3+2+1)=15
• WEIGHTED AVERAGE=(∑WXi) / (∑W)
• (Where i=1,2,3,4….)
•
•
• WEIGHTED AVERAGE=(∑WXi) / (∑W)
•
• W1=445/15=29.67
• W2=413/15=27.53
• W3=399/15=26.60
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES WEIGHTED RANK
AVERAGE

Reimbursement of Tuition 29.67 1

Fee

Scholarship 27.53 2

Educational loan 26.60 3

• CONCLUSION:
• It can be concluded that most of the respondents are satisfied with
the reimbursement of tuition fee provided by the company.the
weightage given for Reimbursement of tution fee is 29.67,weightage
given for scholarship is 27.53 and thw weightage given for Educational
loan is 26.60.
•
• ONE WAY ANOVA
• AIM: To find out the amount of variation within each of these
samples ,relative to the amount of variation between the samples
regarding the rank assigned by the employees about various facilities.
RATING OF FACILITY BENEFITS

Facilities 1 2 3 4 5
Medical 50 39 7 6 8
Education for 29 50 19 7 5
children

Housing 24 28 40 8 10
Travelling 12 13 26 20 39
Recreation 13 14 28 33 22
TOTAL 128 144 120 74 84
• HYPOTHESIS (H0): There is no difference in rank assigned by respondents for various facilities.

• HYPOTHESIS (H1): There is difference in rank assigned by respondents for various facilities.

• T=Total of all the individual values of n items.

• Here , T=550 and n=25, k=5

• Correction factor=(T)2/n=(550*550)/25

• =12,100

• Total SS(sum of squares)=sum of squares of all the observations - (T)2/n

• =∑Xij2-(T)2/n

• SST=502+392+72+62+82+292+502+192+72+52+242+282+402+82+102+122+132+262+202+

• 392+132+142+282+332+222 -12100

• =16702-12100

• = 4602

• SS BETWEEN=∑(Tj)2/nj --(T)2/n

• = (128) 2/5+(144) 2/5+(120) 2/5+(74) 2/5+(84) 2/5

• =3276.8+4147.2+2880+1095.2+1411.2

• =12810.40 -12100

• =710.4

• SS WITHIN==∑Xij2 - ∑(Tj)2/nj

• = 16702-12810.40

• = 3891.6
ONE –WAY ANOVA TABLE

SOURCES OF SUM OF DEGREES OF MEAN SQUARE F-ratio F-RATIO

VARIATION SQUARES FREEDOM (5% F-limit)

BETWEEN 710.4 (k-1) 710.4/4=177.6 177.6/194.58 F(4,20)

SAMPLES (5-1)=4 =0.9127 =2.87

WITHIN 3891.6 (n-k) 3891.6/20=194.58

SAMPLES (25-5)=20
TOTAL 4602 (n-1)
(25-1)=24
• At 5% level of significance,the tabulated value is 2.87
• Calculated value =0.9127
• Therefore ,
• Calculated value(0.9127) < tabulated value(2.87)
• Hence ,H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected.
• CONCLUSION:
• It was observed that there is no significant difference in rank assigned
by respondents for various
• Facilities.
• AIM: To find out the amount of variation within each of these
samples ,relative to the amount of variation between the samples
regarding the rank assigned by the employees about various facilities
BENEFITS OF EMPLOYEE WELFARE

BENEFITS 1 2 3 4 5
Creates 58 30 5 7 10
efficiency
towards work
Improves 29 44 19 12 6
physical &
Mental
health
Increases the 34 38 24 10 4
standard of
living
Loyalty 27 33 14 21 15
towards the
work
Promote 28 22 27 23 10
healthy
industrial
relationship
• HYPOTHESIS (H0): There is no variation among the respondents in rating the benefits

• HYPOTHESIS (H1): There is variation among the respondents in rating the benefits.

• T=Total of all the individual values of n items.

• Here , T=550 and n=25, k=5

• Correction factor=(T)2/n=(550*550)/25

• =12,100

• Total SS(sum of squares)=sum of squares of all the observations - (T)2/n

• =∑Xij2-(T)2/n

• SST=582+292+342+272+282+302+442+382+332+222+52+192+242+142+272+72+122+102+212+

• 232+102+62+42+152+102 -12100

• =16354-12100

• = 4254

• SS BETWEEN=∑(Tj)2/nj --(T)2/n

• = (176) 2/5+(167) 2/5+(89) 2/5+(73) 2/5+(45) 2/5

• =6195+5577.8+1584.2+1065.8+405-12100

• =14828-12100

• =2728

• SS WITHIN==∑Xij2 - ∑(Tj)2/nj

• = 16354-14828

• = 1526
ONE –WAY ANOVA TABLE

SOURCES OF SUM OF DEGREES OF MEAN SQUARE F-ratio F-RATIO

VARIATION SQUARES FREEDOM (5% F-limit)

BETWEEN 2728 (k-1) 2728/4= 682 682/76.3 F(4,20)

SAMPLES (5-1)=4 =8.93 =2.87

WITHIN 1526 (n-k) 1526/20=76.3

SAMPLES (25-5)=20
TOTAL 4254 (n-1)
(25-1)=24
• At 5% level of significance,the tabulated value is 2.87
• Calculated value =8.93
• Therefore ,
• Calculated value(8.93) > tabulated value(2.87)
• Hence ,H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted.
• 1 FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
• 1) It was found that 0% of respondents belongs to less than 20 years ,25 % of respondents belongs to 21-25 years,41% of respondents belongs to
26-35 years,26% of the respondents belongs to 36-50 years and 8% of the respondents belongs to above 50 years.
•
• 2)67% were Male employees and 33% were Female employees.
•
• 3) 60% of respondents fall in the category of Degree/Diploma,35% of respondents fall in the category of Post graduate, 5% of respondents fall in the
category of Others.
• 4) 22% of respondents have 1-5 yrs experience, 39% of respondents have 6-10 yrs experience, 30% of respondents have 11-20 yrs experience, 9% of
respondents have above yrs experience.
• 5) 15.45% of respondents are having income 10000-20000/month, 33.64% of respondents are having income 20001-30000/month, 38.18% of
respondents are having income 30001-40000/month, 12.73% of respondents are having income 40001-50000/month and 0% of respondents having
income above 50000/month.
• 6) 72.73% were aware of various welfare measures provided by the company and 27.27% were not aware of various welfare measures provided by
the company.
• 7) 45.45% of the respondents rated medical facility as the first most benefitted facility, 45.45% of the respondents rated educational facility as the
second most benefitted facility, 36.36% of the respondents rated housing facility as the third most benefitted facility, 25.45% of the respondents rated
recreation facility as the fourth most benefitted facility and 35.45% of the respondents rated travelling facility as the fifth most benefitted facility
• 8) For routine check up 24.55 % of the respondents are highly satisfied, 50.91 % of the
respondents are satisfied, for First aid 11.82 % of the respondents are highly satisfied, for
medicine supplied 16.36 % of the respondents are highly satisfied,For Ambulance service 12.73 %
of the respondents are highly satisfie
• 9)Most of the respondents are satisfied with over all medical facility provided.
•
• 10).For the Reimbursement of tuition fee 30 % of the respondents are highly satisfied, 50.91 % of
the respondents are satisfied, 13.64 % of the respondents are neutral, 4.54 % of the respondents
are Dissatisfied and 0.90 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, for scholarship 15.45 % of
the respondents are highly satisfied, 51.82 % of the respondents are satisfied, 26.36% of the
respondents are neutral, 5.45% of the respondents are Dissatisfied and 0.90 % of the respondents
are highly dissatisfied, for educational loan 11.82 % of the respondents are highly satisfied, 51.82
% of the respondents are satisfied, 25.45% of the respondents are neutral, 9.09 % of the
respondents are Dissatisfied and 1.81% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
• 11) Most of the respondents are satisfied with over all Educational facility provided.
• 12) For quality of food 15.45 % of the respondents are highly satisfied, 60% of the
respondents are satisfied, 15.45 % of the respondents are neutral, 4.54 % of the
respondents are Dissatisfied and 4.54 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, for
quantity of food 12.73 % of the respondents are highly satisfied, 57.27% of the
respondents are satisfied, 24.55% of the respondents are neutral, 5.45 % of the
respondents are Dissatisfied and 0 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, for price
of the food 15.45 % of the respondents are highly satisfied, 54.54 % of the respondents
are satisfied, 23.64 % of the respondents are neutral, 5.45 % of the respondents are
Dissatisfied and 0.90 % of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
• 13) Most of the respondents are satisfied with the overall canteen facility provided
• 14)56.36% of respondents are satisfied with the housing facility provided and 43.64% of
the respondents are not satisfied with the housing facility provided.
• 15) 63.64 % of the respondents values Holiday Homes as beneficial,23.64% of the
respondents values clubs as beneficial recreation and 12.73 % of the respondents values
sports events as a beneficial recreation .
• 16)60% of the respondents rated first for Drinking water ,31.82 % of the
respondents rated second for seating arrangement,11.82 % of the respondents
rated third for lighting,18.18% of the respondents rated fourth for first aid
appliances,13.64% of the respondents rated fifth for latrines & urinals,13.64% of
the respondents rated six forcanteen,18.18% of the respondents rated seven for
washing place,7.27% of the respondents rated eight for spittoons,12.73% of the
respondents rated nine for changing rooms and 17.27% of the respondents rated
ten for rest rooms.
•
• 17) For 52.73 % of respondents welfare creates efficiency towards work,for 40%
of the respondents welfare improves Physical and Mental health, for 24.55% of
the respondents welfare promotes healthy Industrial relationship, for 19.09% of
the respondents welfare creates Loyalty towards the work and for 4% of
respondents welfare increases standard of living.
• 18)Most of the employees opined that welfare measures plays as a
motivational factor.
• 19)67.27% of respondents are occasionally asked for the feedback
about the welfare measures,18.18% of respondents are often asked
for the feedback and 14.55 % of the respondents are never asked for
the feedback.
• 20)18.18% the welfare requirement is determined by observation,
40% the welfare requirement is determined by suggestion, 8.18% the
welfare is determined by interview and 33.64% the welfare
requirement is determined by performance.
•
• 21) 65.45% of the respondents are satisfied with overall welfare measures provided and
34.55% of the respondents are not satisfied with overall welfare measures provided.
• 3.2 SUGGESTIONS
• The Management has to improve the quality and adequate items of the food which is
one of the most important basic amenities and it helps to satisfy the employees.
• The Number of spittoons provided at the work place is not sufficient, so the company
has to increase the number of spittoons which keeps the environment clean.
• Rest room facility has to be sufficiently provided.
• Housing facility can be improved.
• Adequate number of first aid appliances has to be provided.
•