Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Chapter 07
Analysis of Stress and Strain
• When working with stress elements, we must always keep in mind that only
one intrinsic state of stress exists at a point in a stressed body, regardless of
the orientation of the element being used to portray that state of stress.
• When we have two elements with different orientations at the same point in
a body, the stresses acting on the faces of the two elements are different, but
they still represent the same state of stress, namely, the stress at the point
under consideration.
• This situation is analogous to the representation of a force vector by its
components—although the components are different when the coordinate
axes are rotated to a new position, the force itself is the same.
• This stress condition is very common because it exists at the surface of any
stressed body, except at points where external loads act on the surface.
Example 7.2
FIG. 7-12 (a) Element in pure shear, and (b) principal stresses.
Chap 04 ` Engr. M. Fahim 11
7.3 PRINICPAL STRESSES AND MAX SHEAR STRESS
This equation shows that the planes of maximum shear stress occur at 45° to the principal planes.
The maximum negative shear stress τmin has the same magnitude
but opposite sign.
Thus, the maximum shear stress is equal to one-half the difference of the principal stresses.
This same normal stress acts on the planes of maximum negative shear stress.
In the particular cases of uniaxial stress and biaxial stress (Fig. 7-11), the planes of maximum shear
stress occur at 45° to the x and y axes. In the case of pure shear (Fig. 7-12), the maximum shear
stresses occur on the x and y planes.
To derive these expressions for maximum in plane shear, we considered elements that were
obtained by rotating the xyz axes about the z axis, which is a principal axis.
We can also obtain maximum shear stresses by 45° rotations about the other two principal
axes (the x1 and y1 axes in Fig. 7-13b). As a result, we obtain three sets of maximum positive
and maximum negative shear stresses :
Note that as we move around Mohr’s circle (Fig. 7-16c), we encounter point P1
where the normal stress reaches its algebraically largest value and the shear stress is
zero. Hence, point P1 represents a principal stress and a principal plane.
The abscissa σ1 of point P1 gives the algebraically larger principal stress and its angle
2θp1 from the reference point A (where θ = 0) gives the orientation of the principal
plane.
If we now limit our discussion to structures having only very small strains (as is usually the case), we
can disregard the terms in Eq. (7-43b) that consist of products of small strains.
From this equation we see that the maximum possible value of Poisson’s ratio for common materials is
0.5, because a larger value means that the volume decreases when the material is in tension, which is
contrary to ordinary physical behavior.
The sum of these two terms gives the strain energy stored in the element:
Thus, the strain-energy density (strain energy per unit volume) due to the normal stresses and strains is
By combining the strain-energy densities for the normal and shear strains, we obtain the following
formula for the strain-energy density in plane stress:
Substituting for the strains from Eqs. (7-34) and (7-35), we obtain the
strain-energy density in terms of stresses alone:
In a similar manner, we can substitute for the stresses from Eqs. (7-36)
and (7-37) and obtain the strain-energy density in terms of strains alone:
Of course, we can also cut through the element in skew directions, so that the resulting
inclined planes are skew to all three coordinate axes.
The normal and shear stresses acting on such planes can be obtained by a more complicated
three dimensional analysis. However, the normal stresses acting on skew planes are
intermediate in value between the algebraically maximum and minimum principal stresses,
and the shear stresses on those planes are smaller (in absolute value) than the absolute
maximum shear stress obtained from Eqs. (7-52a, b, and c).
This equation is valid for any material provided the strains are small.
If Hooke’s law holds for the material, we can substitute for the strains:
Under these stress conditions, any plane cut through the element will be subjected to the same normal
stress σ0 and will be free of shear stress. Thus, we have equal normal stresses in every direction and no
shear stresses anywhere in the material. Every plane is a principal plane, and the three Mohr’s circles
shown in Fig. 7-28 reduce to a single point.
The normal strains in spherical stress are also the same in all directions, provided the material is
homogeneous and isotropic. If Hooke’s law applies, the normal strains are:
Equation (7-60) is usually expressed in more compact form by introducing a new quantity K called the
volume modulus of elasticity, or bulk modulus of elasticity, which is defined as follows:
Thus, the volume modulus can be defined as the ratio of the spherical
stress to the volumetric strain, which is analogous to the definition of
the modulus E in uniaxial stress. Note that the preceding formulas for e
and K are based upon the assumptions that the strains are small and
Hooke’s law holds for the material.
From Eq. (7-61) for K, we see that if Poisson’s ratio ν equals 1/3, the moduli K and E are
numerically equal. If ν = 0, then K has the value E/3, and if ν = 0.5, K becomes infinite, which
corresponds to a rigid material having no change in volume (that is, the material is incompressible).
An exception occurs when an element in plane stress is subjected to equal and opposite normal stresses
(that is, when σx = -σy) and Hooke’s law holds for the material. In this special case, there is no normal
strain in the z direction, as shown by Eq. (7-34c), and therefore the element is in a state of plane strain as
well as plane stress.
Another special case, albeit a hypothetical one, is when a material has Poisson’s
ratio equal to zero (ν = 0); then every plane stress element is also in plane strain because εz = 0.
An analogous situation exists for plane strain. Although we will derive the strain-transformation equations
for the case of plane strain in the xy plane, the equations are valid even when a strain εz exists. The reason
is simple enough—the strain εz does not affect the geometric relationships used in the derivations.
Therefore, the transformation equations for plane strain can also be used for the strains in plane stress.
Since each gage measures the normal strain in only one direction, and since the
directions of the principal stresses are usually unknown, it is necessary to use three
gages in combination, with each gage measuring the strain in a different direction.
FIG. 7-36 Three electrical-resistance strain gages arranged as a 45° strain rosette
(magnified view).
From t