Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Evaluation Criteria Table 1: Description of Likelihood (Probability)

    Încărcat de

    Rafee Pie
    66 vizualizări2 pagini
    The document provides tables describing how to evaluate risks associated with hazards. Table 1 describes the likelihood of a hazard occurring on a scale of frequent to improbable. Table 2 describes the consequence or severity of a hazard on a scale of disastrous to noticeable. Table 3 combines likelihood and severity to determine an overall risk level of acceptable, moderate, or unacceptable. Table 4 provides actions that should be taken for each risk level, such as implementing additional controls or prohibiting work.

    Descriere originală:

    sharing

    Titlu original

    Evaluation Criteria

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    PPT, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The document provides tables describing how to evaluate risks associated with hazards. Table 1 describes the likelihood of a hazard occurring on a scale of frequent to improbable. Table 2 describes the consequence or severity of a hazard on a scale of disastrous to noticeable. Table 3 combines likelihood and severity to determine an overall risk level of acceptable, moderate, or unacceptable. Table 4 provides actions that should be taken for each risk level, such as implementing additional controls or prohibiting work.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PPT, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    66 vizualizări2 pagini

    Evaluation Criteria Table 1: Description of Likelihood (Probability)

    Încărcat de

    Rafee Pie
    The document provides tables describing how to evaluate risks associated with hazards. Table 1 describes the likelihood of a hazard occurring on a scale of frequent to improbable. Table 2 describes the consequence or severity of a hazard on a scale of disastrous to noticeable. Table 3 combines likelihood and severity to determine an overall risk level of acceptable, moderate, or unacceptable. Table 4 provides actions that should be taken for each risk level, such as implementing additional controls or prohibiting work.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PPT, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 2

    Evaluation Criteria

    Table 1 : Description of Likelihood (Probability)


    Ranking Description

    a) Probability of hazard happening – Happens repeatedly at the workplace, and/or


    Frequent 5
    b) Exposure – 2 hours continuously.

    a) Probability of hazard happening – Had happen in the company; and/or


    Probable 4
    b) Exposure – 3 hours continuously.

    a) Probability of hazard happening – Heard of happening in the industry; and/or


    Occasional 3
    b) Exposure – 4 hours continuously.

    a) Probability of hazard happening – Could occurred in the same industry, and/or


    Remote 2
    b) Exposure – 5 hours continuously.

    a) Probability of hazard happening – Could occur in other industry; and/or


    Improbable 1
    b) Exposure – > 6 hours continuously.

    Table 2 : Description of Consequence (Severity)

    Ranking Description

    a) Fatality or permanent disability or irreversible illness; and/or


    b) Stop work order; and/or
    Disastrous 5
    c) Fine max. RM500,000, and/or
    d) Extensive damage > RM250,000.

    a) Major injury/illness (M.C. > 4 days); and/or


    b) NOP; and/or
    Critical 4
    c) Fine > RM150,000 and < RM500,000; and/or
    d) Major damage > RM50,000 and < RM250,000

    a) Minor injury/illness (M.C between 1 to 3 days); and/or


    b) NOI; and/or
    Serious 3
    c) Fine > RM50,000 and < RM150,000;
    d) Localised damage (Repair cost > RM10,000 and < RM50,000).

    a) First aid cases/medical treatment; and/or


    b) NCR/CAR; and/or
    Minor 2
    c) Fine max. RM50,000; and/or
    d) Minor damage (No or less disruption, repair cost > RM1,000 and < RM10,000).

    a) Near miss/ unsafe act/ unsafe condition; and/or


    b) NCR/CAR; and/or
    Noticeable 1
    c) Comments by authorities; and/or
    d) Slight damage to equipment with no disruption to process.
    Evaluation Criteria

    Acceptable Moderate Unacceptable


    1–4 5 – 14 15 – 25

    Table 4 : HIRADC Action Table


    Risk Level Action & Timescale

    a) No additional controls are required. Consideration may be given to a more


    cost effective solution or improvement that imposes no additional cost
    burden.
    Acceptable 1–4
    b) Monitoring is required to ensure that the controls are maintained.
    c) Additional control shall be proposed when necessary.

    a) Effort should be made to reduce the risk, but the costs or prevention should
    be carefully measured & limited. Risk reduction measures should be
    implemented within a defined time period.
    b) Where the moderate risk is associated with extremely harmful
    consequences, further assessment may be necessary to establish more
    Moderate 5 – 14 precisely the likelihood of harm as a basis of determining the need for
    improved control measures.
    c) Additional control shall be proposed and implemented upon
    commencement of work if necessary.
    d) Briefing by SHO on safety awareness.

    a) Work should not be commenced or continued unless the risk has been
    successfully reduced.
    b) Permit to work/qualification/competency shall be obtained prior to
    commencement of work and briefing shall be conducted by SHO on safety
    awareness.
    Unacceptable 15 – 25
    c) If it is possible to reduce risk even with unlimited resources, work has to
    remain prohibited.
    d) Additional control must be proposed and implemented before
    commencement of work. The risk level shall then be reduced to at least
    moderate.

    S-ar putea să vă placă și