Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PhD Candidate
Energy and Power System Cluster
Department of Electrical Engineering,
Syed Babar Ali School of Science and Engineering
Lahore University of Management Sciences
1
Presentation Outline
1. Need For Rural Electrification
2. Overview of the Existing Technologies for Rural
Electrification
A. Rural Electrification Via interconnection with National Grid
B. Stand alone System e.g. Chief Minister Ujala Scheme
C. Microgrids based Electrification
3. Classification of SOLAR DC Microgrids on the basis of
Architecture
A. Central Generation Central Storage Architecture (CGCSA)
B. Central Generation Distributed Storage Architecture (CGDSA)
C. Distributed Generation Distributed Storage Architecture (DGDSA)
4. Financial Viability of Proposed DGDSA
5. Conclusion
2
Impact of Reliable Access to Electricity on Standards of Living
Worldwide 1.1 Billion People (15% of World population) are without Access to Electricity [1] and
84% of Non-Electrified population lives in rural areas [1]
Around 30 million People and 30,000 Villages in Pakistan are not Connected to National Grid [2].
United Nation’s SDG-7 aims to provide universal access to electricity by 2030.
Projected electrification rate in India, Indonesia and other south east Asia is in line with SDG-7
Developing Asia (including Pakistan) is behind the target while Africa is far away.
Rural Electrification is the Need of the Hour to Attain the Socio-Economic Benefits Associated
with the Availability of Electricity
210
Unelectrified Population
195
Total Population
180
165
150
Million People
135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
2000 2005 2010 2016 2018
Year
Figure 1: World Wide Rural Electrification Scenario [1] Figure 2: Rural Electrification Scenario in Pakistan [1, 2]
[1]. "World energy outlook 2017," International Energy Agency, vol. 1, 2017.
[2]. Electricity for All: Rural electrification – I by Syed Akhtar Ali, Business Recorder, 11-03-2018. 3
A. Electrification via Laying Three Phase AC Transmission and
Distribution Lines to Connect it with National Grid
Table 2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Standalone Solar System for Rural Electrification
Advantages Drawbacks
Although, this technology
can provide a stop gap Renewable, Clean and Noise Free Can not Provide Power beyond
Operation Subsistence Living
measure for providing
rural occupants with very Cost Effective for Limited Unable to Drive High Power
basic electricity, however, Electrification Community Loads (e.g. Filtration
plants, Agriculture Pumps or School)
it is unlikely to bring
people out of poverty and Simpler Design Incapable of Resource Sharing
contribute for socio-
economic uplift Highly Efficient due to DC Can not Extract the Benefit of Usage
Generation, storage and Loads Diversity
5
C. Electrification Via Microgrids
A highly reliable localized
network of interconnected
generation, storage and loads.
In order to make it best fit for
Rural Electrification, Following
Power
parameters needs to be Processing
carefully selected:
1. Generation (Renewable/
Non-Renewable)
Figure 5. Schematics for Microgrid based Rural Electrification
Solar PV (due to green
nature and naturally
Abundant Availability) Table 3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Microgrid based Rural Electrification
Advantages Drawbacks
2. Distribution Architecture
(AC/ DC) Resource Sharing Capability at a Top – Down Centralized Planning as
village scale per Peak Power Requirements
DC due to higher efficiency
No need to Lay Long Distance Low Utilization Factor
Transmission Lines
3. Generation/Storage
Architecture Lower Line Losses in Comparison Higher Up-front Cost in Comparison
to Utility Grid Interconnection to Standalone System
(Centralized/Distributed)
Distributed as discussed in Higher Power Quality Rigid in terms of Future Expansions
next slides
A. Central Generation Central Storage Architecture (CGCSA)
e.g. Mera Gao Power in India [3]
Power
Processing 24 V DC Distribution
Limitations of CGCSA
Higher Line Losses due to central Placement of Resources
Lower Distribution Efficiency
Higher Voltage Drops at the Rear End
Higher Up-front Cost
Lower Scalability
Suitable only for Limited Power Allocation per house (0.2 amps at 24 V)
No Provision of Communal Load
Can not Contribute towards Significant Uplift of the Society
[3]. D. Palit, G. K. Sarangi, and P. Krithika, "Energising Rural India Using Distributed Generation: The Case of Solar Mini-Grids in
Chhattisgarh State, India," in Mini-Grids for Rural Electrification of Developing Countries, ed: Springer, 2014, pp. 313-342. 7
B. Central Generation Central Storage Architecture (CGDSA)
Presented by Maduri et.al UC Berkley, USA [4]
Power
Processing 380V DC Distribution
[4]. P. A. Madduri, J. Poon, J. Rosa, M. Podolsky, E. Brewer, and S. R. Sanders, "Scalable DC Microgrids for Rural Electrification in Emerging Regions,"
IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. PP, pp. 1-1, 2016. 8
An Architecture having
Low Cost Deployment
Reliability
Scalability
9
C. Distributed Generation Central Distributed Architecture
(DGDSA) proposed by Mashood et. al LUMS [5]
120 V DC Distribution
Community Centre/School
[5]. M. Nasir, H. A. Khan, A. Hussain, L. Mateen, and N. A. Zaffar, "Solar PV Based Scalable DC Microgrid for Rural Electrification in
Developing Regions," IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2017. 10
D. Distributed Generation Central Distributed Architecture
(DGDSA) Continued… proposed by Mashood et. al [5]
Characteristics of DGDSA
Lower Distribution Losses due to distribution of generation/storage resources
in individual nanogrids
Higher efficiency and Lower Voltage Dips
Scalable in Design and Planning (Bottom–up planning)
Resource Sharing/can extract the benefit of usage diversity
Each house can consume more than its own generation
Overall structure Can aggregate power for Community Loads
Communication-Less Coordination among the distributed Resources through
droop control [6].
[5]. M. Nasir, H. A. Khan, A. Hussain, L. Mateen, and N. A. Zaffar, "Solar PV Based Scalable DC Microgrid for Rural Electrification in
Developing Regions," IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2017.
11
[6]. M. Nasir, Z.jin, H.A. Khan, N.A. Zaffar, J.C. Vasquez and J. M. Guerrero, ‘’A Decentralized Control Architecture Applied to Cluster of
Multiple nanogrids for Rural Electrification of Developing Regions”, IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, 2018.
• Survey for the Estimation of Willingness to Pay for three level of services
1. Light only +charging load (5W/household)
2. Lights, Fan and Charging Load (30W/household)
Table 4. Mapping of Willingness to Pay on Estimated Cost of the Microgrid for the Calculation of Payback time [7]
Load per house Capital Cost Capital + 25 years Subscription Charges Per user per Average
(24/7 provision to O&M Cost Month for payback in (PKR/Month) Willingness
subscribers) (PKR) (PKR) to Pay
(PKR/month)
3 years 6 years 9 years 12
years
3 Lights, 956300 2614900 665 445 330 270 340
1 fan, charging
unit
3 Lights, 1000000 2678700 695 473 350 325 435
1 fan, charging
and Communal
load
• Mapping Shows that pay back time for microgrid investment is almost 9 years.
[7]. H.F. Ahmad, H. A. Khan, F. Nadeem, M. Nasir and N. A. Zaffar, "Decentralised Electric Power Delivery for Rural Electrification in Pakistan “,
12 Energy
Policy, 2018 (Under Review).
Distributed Generation Distributed Storage Architecture (DGDSA) based
Scalable Solar DC Microgrids offer:
13
Mashood Nasir
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Electrical Engineering
SBASSE – LUMS
mashood.nasir@lums.edu.pk