Too often we were willing to accept statements about
human behavior based on the opinions of people who have status and authority—called authoritative evidence.
Regardless of a person’s position, they need to provide
observable and measurable evidence to support their statements and conclusions—called empirical evidence. Goals of Research in Psychology
Describe how people behave.
Explain why they behave as they do.
Determine how to improve human behaviors.
Observational Studies
Jane Goodall observing chimpanzees in the Rain
Forests and discovering their ability to use tools.
Researchers observing how the pace of life among
31 countries varies significantly.
John Gottman’s observations of how married
couples resolve conflict. Jane Goodall observing Chimps Gottman discovered that couples style of resolving conflict had predictive power Case Studies: Study subjects who have been through unique experiences
Victor, the wild boy who was raised by
wolves as well as living in isolation
People who have been blind throughout
childhood provided ability to see
Phineas Gage who had a steel rod blow
through his brain and survived Case Study of “Feral” Boy Results of case studies of feral children and animals who grow up with minimal social interaction all have very similar results
Exhibit no language or social skills
Developmentally very slow
Often violent and emotionally stunted
Their brains’ are severely underdeveloped
Case study of Phineas Gage Case Studies of Blind People Provided Visual Restoration
Review of all case studies of blind people
given vision during adulthood have the same results.
Vision confusing, frustrating and tiring—an
avalanche of rapid but uninterpretable impressions. Life becomes overwhelming and depressing
Only able to perceive color and motion
One of the most striking overall findings is
that formerly blind people provided sight suffer from depression and despair
Find themselves between two worlds, at
home in neither—a torment cannot escape Correlational Studies
Collect data on two or more variables to see
if they occur together or not
Just because occur together in time does not
mean one is causing the other
Correlation does not mean causation
Examples of Correlational Studies
The association between use of electronic media
and mood has negative or inverse relationship: when one goes up, the other goes down and vice versa
Association between class attendance and class
grade: positive correlation—when one goes up the other goes up and vice versa
What could be several explanations for both
correlations? Why can’t conclude cause-effect?
Not control for personalities or situations so
not know what other factors influencing moods
What other factors than class attendance
could explain why students who attend do well in classes? Lung Cancer and Smoking
Very compelling, strong positive correlation between
smoking and lung cancer.
Tobacco companies still claim for years that there
was no scientific support for the fact that smoking causes cancer as a correlation between variables might not be
What other explanations could be used to explain
this strong positive correlation Importance of Experimental Research: Able to conclude cause-effect
Control environment of subjects as assign at
random to control and experimental groups
Expose experimental group to treatment but
not to control group for comparison purposes
Compare behavior of subjects in both groups
after exposure to treatment Experiments prove smoking causes lung cancer
Control variables so can conclude cause-
effect Subjects were Beagles Randomly assign puppies to smoking versus non-smoking group—the experimental and control groups Beagles that smoked far more likely to get lung cancer Experiment with Beagles Experiments
Have independent and dependent variables
Independent variable is the treatment
Dependent variable is the behavior that
results from the treatment Crucial need for critical thinking