Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Communities
Airess Stewart, Katie Jeffrey, Sebrina Shields
Gill 2014:
Elementary ● 4 staff and Principal attended 3 day PLC summer
School: training
● Guiding coalition created
PLC Journey
2015:
2016:
know it?
PLC Structure
● Reading scores will reflect higher growth and achievement with Instructional Support Time
● All teachers responded to the survey and interview questions honestly and accurately.
Limitations
● Difficult to isolate what actual program, strategy or other variables such as individual teacher
Collaboration and
Focus on Learning
Results
Teacher questionnaire open response questions
What do you like best about your PLC? What does your Principal do to
support PLC?
● Most teachers indicated the time to
collaborate, identify student needs ● Most teachers indicated
and share ideas provided time was most
supportive
How could your PLC be improved?
Impact:
★ 3rd and 5th grade did not meet their projected growth
★ 1st, 2nd, and 4th grade did meet their projected growth
★ The Conditional Growth for 1st grade was in the 99th percentile
★ The Conditional Growth for 2nd and 4th grade was above average
★ The Conditional Growth for 3rd and 5th was below average at the 7th and
37th percentile
Percent of students proficient (60 percentile or higher) for math
● a focus on learning
● a collaborative culture and
● collective responsibility with a results-
orientation
to NWEA scores
district-wide.
Implication for 1. Collaboration amongst other
elementary schools in the
Future Research Farmington district.
2. Collaboration with elementary
schools outside the district with
similar populations.
3. Focus on a continued internal
check of PLC efficiency and
effectiveness.
4. Triangulate data outside of the
PLC process to look for other
variables that impact student
growth and achievement.
For additional information, please
contact us:
Thank you!
airess.stewart@farmington.k12.mi.us
katie.derington@gmail.com
sebrina.shields@gmail.com