Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Chap 1
The Start of the Modern
Electronics Era
Bardeen, Shockley, and Brattain at Bell The first germanium bipolar transistor.
Labs - Brattain and Bardeen invented Roughly 50 years later, electronics
the bipolar transistor in 1947. account for 10% (4 trillion dollars) of
the world GDP.
Electronics Milestones
1874 Braun invents the solid-state 1958 Integrated circuit developed by
rectifier. Kilby and Noyce
1906 DeForest invents triode vacuum 1961 First commercial IC from Fairchild
tube. Semiconductor
1907-1927 1963 IEEE formed from merger or IRE
First radio circuits developed from and AIEE
diodes and triodes. 1968 First commercial IC opamp
1925 Lilienfeld field-effect device patent 1970 One transistor DRAM cell invented
filed. by Dennard at IBM.
1947 Bardeen and Brattain at Bell 1971 4004 Intel microprocessor
Laboratories invent bipolar introduced.
transistors.
1978 First commercial 1-kilobit memory.
1952 Commercial bipolar transistor
1974 8080 microprocessor introduced.
production at Texas Instruments.
1984 Megabit memory chip introduced.
1956 Bardeen, Brattain, and Shockley
receive Nobel prize. 2000 Alferov, Kilby, and Kromer share
Nobel prize
Evolution of Electronic Devices
Vacuum Discrete
Tubes Transistors
*Source: Gordon Moore’s Plenary address at the 2003 International Solid State
Circuits Conference.
5 Commendments
Moore’s Law : The number of transistors on a
chip doubles annually
Rock’s Law : The cost of semiconductor tools
doubles every four years
Machrone’s Law: The PC you want to buy will
always be $5000
Metcalfe’s Law : A network’s value grows
proportionately to the number of its users
squared
5 Commandments(cont.)
Wirth’s Law : Software is slowing faster
than hardware is accelerating
Further Reading: “5 Commandments”,
IEEE Spectrum December 2003, pp. 31-
35.
Moore’s law
Moore predicted that the number of transistors
that can be integrated on a die would grow
exponentially with time.
Amazingly visionary – million transistor/chip
barrier was crossed in the 1980’s.
16 M transistors (Ultra Sparc III)
140 M transistor (HP PA-8500)
1.7B transistor (Intel Montecito)
DEC PDP-11 CPU
HP PA7000 RISC
Motorola 68020
Motorola 68040
Toshiba MIPS
Intel 8088
Intel 80386
80386 (cont.)
Intel 80486
Intel Pentium
Intel Pentium 4 Prescott
Penryn and Nehalem
Penryn : 45nm Core 2
Architecture : Core 2
Extreme QX9650
Nehalem : Core i7
Intel CPU Evolution
Device Feature Size
Feature size
reductions enabled by
process innovations.
Smaller features lead
to more transistors
per unit area and
therefore higher
density.
Rapid Increase in Density of
Microelectronics
(a) VC C S (b) CC C S
v1 A v1 i1 i 1
(c) VC VS (d) CC VS
F igu r e 1 . 1 0 - C o n t r o lled S o u r ces
(a ) Vo lt a ge- co n t r o lled cu r r en t s o u r ce - (VC C S )
(b )C u r r en t - co n t r o lled cu r r en t s o u r ce - (C C C S )
(c) Vo lt a ge- co n t r o lled vo lt a ge s o u r ce - (VC VS )
(d ) C u r r en t - co n t r o lled vo lt a ge s o u r ce - (C C VS ).
Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL)
For any lumped electric circuit, for any of
its nodes, and at any time, the algebraic
sum of all branch currents leaving the
node is zero.
KCL Example
When applying KCL to circuit, first assign reference
direction for each branch.
For node 2, i4-i3-i6=0
For node 1, -i1+i2+i3=0
Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law (KVL)
For any lumped electric circuit, for any of
its loops, and at any time, the algebraic
sum of the branch voltages around the
loop is zero.
KVL Example
For loop I, v4+v5-v6=0
Loop II, v4+v5-v2-v1=0
Properties of KCL and KVL
KCL imposes a linear constraint on the
branch currents.
KCL applies to any lumped electric circuit;
it is independent of the nature of the
elements.
KCL expresses the conservation of charge
at any time.
Properties of KVL and KCL (cont.)
and
Circuit Theory Review: Current
Division (cont.)
Using the derived equations
with the indicated values,
3 k
i1 5 ma 3.00 mA
2 k 3 k
2 k
i 2 5 ma 2.00 mA
2 k 3 k
vo
1RS
vs
50 11 k
v s 0.718 v s
1RS R1 50 11 k 1 k
and
v TH 0.718 v s
Circuit Theory Review: Find the
Thevenin Equivalent Resistance
Problem: Find the Thevenin
equivalent resistance.
Solution:
Known Information and Given
Data: Circuit topology and
values in figure.
Unknowns: Thevenin
Test voltage vx has been added to the
equivalent resistance RTH.
previous circuit. Applying vx and
Approach: RTH is defined as
solving for ix allows us to find the
the equivalent resistance at the
Thevenin resistance as vx/ix.
output terminals with all
independent sources in the
network set to zero.
Assumptions: None.
Analysis: Next slide…
Circuit Theory Review: Find the
Thevenin Equivalent Resistance (cont.)
Applying KCL,
i x i1 i1 G S v x
G1v x G1v x G S v x
G1 1 G S v x
vx 1 R1
Rth RS
i x G1 1 G S 1
R1 20 k
Rth RS 1 k 1 k 392 282
1 50 1
Circuit Theory Review: Find the Norton
Equivalent Circuit
Problem: Find the Norton
equivalent circuit.
Solution:
Known Information and Given
Data: Circuit topology and
values in figure.
Unknowns: Norton equivalent
A short circuit has been applied
short circuit current iN.
across the output. The Norton
Approach: Evaluate current
current is the current flowing
through output short circuit.
through the short circuit at the
Assumptions: None.
output.
Analysis: Next slide…
Circuit Theory Review: Find the
Thevenin Equivalent Resistance (cont.)
Applying KCL,
i N i1 i1
G1v s G1v s
G1 1v s
v s 1
Short circuit at the output causes
R1 zero current to flow through RS.
Rth is equal to Rth found earlier.
50 1 vs
iN vs (2.55 mS)v s
20 k 392
Final Thevenin and Norton Circuits
Check of Results: Note that vTH=iNRth and this can be used to check the
calculations: iNRth=(2.55 mS)vs(282 ) = 0.719vs, accurate within
round-off error.
While the two circuits are identical in terms of voltages and currents at
the output terminals, there is one difference between the two circuits.
With no load connected, the Norton circuit still dissipates power!
Example : Circuit with a controlled
source
Applying KVL around the loop containing vs
yields
vs = isR1 + i2R2 = isR1 + (is + gmv1)R2 (1.33)
v1 = isR1 (1.34)
vs = is(R1 + R2 + gmR1R2) (1.35)
Req = vs / is = R1 + R2 (1+ gmR1) (1.36)
Req = 3KΩ+2KΩ[1+0.1S*3KΩ] = 605 kΩ. This
value is far larger than either R1 or R2.
iS
+
gmv1
R
1
v
1
3 k - 0.1 v
1
v
S i2
R
2
2 k
R
2
2 k
from : www.evilmadscientist.com
Joule Thief
555 LED Blink
Frequency Spectrum of Electronic
Signals
Nonrepetitive signals have continuous spectra often
occupying a broad range of frequencies
Fourier theory tells us that repetitive signals are
composed of a set of sinusoidal signals with distinct
amplitude, frequency, and phase.
The set of sinusoidal signals is known as a Fourier
series.
The frequency spectrum of a signal is the amplitude and
phase components of the signal versus frequency.
Frequencies of Some Common Signals
RF IF Audio
Amplifier Mixer Amplifier FM
Detector Amplifier
and Filter and Filter
Local
Oscillator
vs = sin2000t V
Av = -5
Note: negative
gain is equivalent
to 180 degress of
phase shift.
Amplifier Frequency Response
Amplifiers can be designed to selectively amplify specific
ranges of frequencies. Such an amplifier is known as a filter.
Several filter types are shown below:
Worst-case analysis
Parameters are manipulated to produce the worst-case min and max
values of desired quantities.
This can lead to over design since the worst-case combination of
parameters is rare.
It may be less expensive to discard a rare failure than to design for
100% yield.
Monte-Carlo analysis
Parameters are randomly varied to generate a set of statistics for
desired outputs.
The design can be optimized so that failures due to parameter variation
are less frequent than failures due to other mechanisms.
In this way, the design difficulty is better managed than a worst-case
approach.
Amplifiers in a familiar electronic
system
The local oscillator, which tunes the radio
receiver to select the desired station.
The mixer circuit actually changes the
frequency of the incoming signal and is
thus a nonlinear circuit.
HW 1
1.2
1.11
1.20
1.22
1.48