0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
64 vizualizări24 pagini
This document discusses common issues with line sizing in piping systems. It notes that 31% of large property damage losses are due to piping system failures. Some key issues covered include:
- Mass and energy balances that are missing important factors can lead to improperly sized lines.
- Guidelines around limiting line velocities are sometimes ignored, which can cause erosion or settling issues.
- Poor record keeping during engineering phases makes detailed design difficult.
- Two-phase and compressible fluid flows are often not well understood and can cause damaging pulsating or choked flows if not addressed properly.
- Maldistribution, water hammer, vortexing, and unexpected temperature effects must be considered to select the proper pipes
This document discusses common issues with line sizing in piping systems. It notes that 31% of large property damage losses are due to piping system failures. Some key issues covered include:
- Mass and energy balances that are missing important factors can lead to improperly sized lines.
- Guidelines around limiting line velocities are sometimes ignored, which can cause erosion or settling issues.
- Poor record keeping during engineering phases makes detailed design difficult.
- Two-phase and compressible fluid flows are often not well understood and can cause damaging pulsating or choked flows if not addressed properly.
- Maldistribution, water hammer, vortexing, and unexpected temperature effects must be considered to select the proper pipes
This document discusses common issues with line sizing in piping systems. It notes that 31% of large property damage losses are due to piping system failures. Some key issues covered include:
- Mass and energy balances that are missing important factors can lead to improperly sized lines.
- Guidelines around limiting line velocities are sometimes ignored, which can cause erosion or settling issues.
- Poor record keeping during engineering phases makes detailed design difficult.
- Two-phase and compressible fluid flows are often not well understood and can cause damaging pulsating or choked flows if not addressed properly.
- Maldistribution, water hammer, vortexing, and unexpected temperature effects must be considered to select the proper pipes
Introduction 31% of large property damage losses are caused by failures in piping systems. Some lines reach 60 inches in diameter - larger than many equipment items. Mass and Energy Balances MB & EB balances must include: Normal mass balance - base case. Start-up, shut down or upset dev’n. Recycle of off-spec products. Equipment bypass conditions. MB for flare, fire water, sewers, steam, condensate and CTW headers. Poor Line Sizing Guidelines Limiting line velocities not known or ignored. Velocity greater than 15 fps in CS pipe can cause erosion. Low velocities (< 3 fps) can cause entrained solids to settle and plug lines. Poor Line Sizing Engineering Discipline Poor record keeping during Phase 3 prevents detailed follow-up in Phase 4 design stage. PSV lines need to be checked in Phase 4. Pump lines need to be checked in Phase 4. Poor Pipe Selection Corrosiveness of fluid unknown. At high temps, degradation may produce acidic components. (La. HumbleTherm example). Pipe not suitable for unexpected cold temperatures. Pipe not suitable for unexpected extreme high temperatures. Choked Flow Of Compressible Fluids Compressible fluid flow not well understood by process engineers. Flows at Mach 1 (Sonic Flow) can be destructive. Choked Flow Example 1 Choked Flow Example 2 Two-Phase Flow
Two Phase Flow not well
understood by process engineers. Horizontal Flow - Baker Chart. Vertical Down Flow. Vertical Up Flow. Baker Chart Horizontal, Two Phase Flow Two-Phase Flow In Vertical Down Flow Piping Siphons may form readily May have damaging pulsating flow Vertical Down Flow Piping Two-Phase Flow In Vertical Up Flow Piping May have damaging pulsating flow 4 ft. dia. Cooling tower inlet pipe experiences severe vibration, fails & floods plant Vertical Up Flow Piping Two-Phase Flow Pressure Drop Two phase flow pressure drops may be higher than expected and thereby limit performance. Two-Phase Flashing Fluids Flashing liquids often not considered during process design.
Two phase flow can be a complex,
transient problem. Two-Phase Flow In PSV Systems PSVs are usually sized for single phase flow. Two phase flow can occur when vessels operated above maximum fill limit. Two phase flow can occur when flows are higher than expected. Vortex Problems Draining water from KO Pot to open sewer during rain storm. Flammable vapor entrained due to formation of liquid vortex. Lightning strikes near plant ISBL. Sewer explodes, wrecks cold box in Ammonia Plant. One operator killed. Maldistribution
Flow in reactor manifolds.
Flows in branched piping. Flows in shell-side of exchangers. Water Hammer
System or vessel design pressures
exceeded when EBV suddenly stops flow. EO transfer example. See computer spreadsheet design program. Water Hammer Results Typical Exam Problems Which flow regime should you avoid for horizontal, two phase flow? If a liquid vortex forms on draining from a vessel, what safety problems can this create? When can a PSV which is sized for single phase flow experience two phase flow? Put Your Money Where Your Mouth is!
Room Temperature Synthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Morphological Evaluation and Their Catalytic Applications For Degradation of Dyes and C-N Bond Formation Reaction PDF