Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Collaborative
Filtering Using Uninteresting Items
ABSTRACT 2
» Filtering Using Uninteresting Items Using this notion, we identify uninteresting items
that have not been rated yet but are likely to
We develop a novel framework, named as l- receive low ratings from users, and selectively
injection, to address the sparsity problem of impute them as low values. As our proposed
recommender systems. By carefully injecting low approach is method-agnostic, it can be easily
values to a selected set of unrated user-item pairs applied to a variety of CF algorithms. Through
in a user-item matrix, we demonstrate that top-N comprehensive experiments with three real-life
recommendation accuracies of various
datasets (e.g., Movielens, Ciao, and Watcha), we
collaborative filtering (CF) techniques can be demonstrate that our solution consistently and
significantly and consistently improved. We first universally enhances the accuracies of existing CF
adopt the notion of pre-use preferences of users algorithms
toward a vast amount of unrated items.
» This approach could mistakenly assign low values to the items that
users might like, thereby affecting an overall accuracy in
recommendation.
» 0-injection simply considers all uninteresting items as zero, it may
neglect to the characteristics of users or items.
PROPOSED SYSTEM: 5
The proposed l-injection approach can improve the accuracy of top-N recommendation
based on two strategies by using Collaborative filter algorithm and Rank Prediction
Technique.
» preventing uninteresting items from being included in the top-N
recommendation.
» Exploiting both uninteresting and rated items to predict the relative
preferences of unrated items more accurately.
» Diverse device hand photos by Facebook
ADVANTAGE: 6
» By using the Location Verification algorithm we can block the user who are
all using fake location.
» The proposed work is very effective compare to the Existing method.
ALGORITHM: 7
» Ram : 1 GB.
REFERENCES 11
»O. Ajao, J. Hong, and W. Liu. A survey of location inference techniques on twitter. Journal of
Information Science, 1:1–10, 2015.
»E. Amig´ o, J. C. De Albornoz, I. Chugur, A. Corujo, J. Gonzalo, T. Mart´ın, E. Meij, M. De
Rijke, and D. Spina. Overview of replab 2013: Evaluating online reputation monitoring
systems. In Proceedings of CLEF, pages 333–352. Springer, 2013.
»F. Atefeh and W. Khreich. A survey of techniques for event detection in twitter.
Computational Intelligence, 31(1):132–164, 2015.
»] H. Bo, P. Cook, and T. Baldwin. Geolocation prediction in social media data by finding
location indicative words. In Proceedings of COLING, pages 1045–1062, 2012.
»J. D. Burger, J. Henderson, G. Kim, and G. Zarrella. Discriminating gender on twitter. In
Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1301–1309, 2011.
12
We Welcome You
OUR PROCESS IS EASY 13