Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Planning
a) Rational Planning (By Banfield)
b) Collaborative Planning ( By Lawrence and Schoenwandt)
Factors that affect strategies for urban planning
1. Mega Growth Mega complexities
Urban growth is spread unequally around the world, and the same is true of its
largest cities.
Mega City has its own characteristics both pros and cons. At the same time, we are
witnessing: New city region emergence (Urban sprawl). These huge megacity regions
create a new urban dynamic. As a result, it is difficult to deliver an efficient
approach to infrastructure challenges.
2. Role and competitiveness
There is a struggle between economic competitiveness and employment,
environment, and quality of life.
This bring out the fact that cities need
modern, efficient infrastructures,
Especially transportation network,
Abundant (preferably skilled) labor
Modern IT and communication technologies
Quality of basic services
Business Friendly policies and regulations
Energy Efficient Strategies
1. Urban Pattern
In their study on “relationship between urban planning and energy consumption”,
Holden and Norland pose the question: does the change of urban forms tend to
reduce the frequency and length of journeys, and hence energy consumption?
a. Compares compact Vs Dispersed development
Concerns with travel behavior
Reducing energy use per capita
2. Land Use Distribution and home- work trip
Housing location influences the distances to
different types of facilities and the spatial
location of most of these facilities suggests
that average travel distances will be shortest for inner-city residents. According
to these studies, up to a certain point, energy use per capita decreases as density
increases, but thereafter energy use starts to increase. Thus, the advantages of
‘mega-cities’ or ‘extreme density areas’ seem to be outweighed by the advantages
offered by more modest forms of urban compactness.(Naess 1997)
3. Buildings: Forms and Planning
Globally, buildings are responsible for approximately 40% of the total world annual
energy consumption.
The integration of energy planning is vast framework and complex matter. First of
all, there is no common agreement on what energy planning actually represents.
For defining the urban planning ,there is a lack of a unique problem statement,
conflicting objectives, conflicting values, dynamic context, scientific complexity,
political complexity, multiple stakeholders with the power to assert their values.
Same goes for the energy efficient architecture of a building. Based on analysis of
foreign and domestic experience of designing energy efficiency residential
buildings, one can generate number of demands.
a) Urban needs: design according to orientation; landscaping
b) Ecological needs: Use of environmentally sound materials; building enabling to
preserve the environment
c) Architectural and planning needs: design of compact form of a plan and
avoidance of irregular facades; stylobate floor lay out to reduce the wind load
on the adjacent territory
d. Constructional needs: Use of efficient thermal insulation materials and
structures for building, use of three- layered building envelops
e. Engineering needs: Use of both passive and active alternative energy
sources systems in building, use of mechanical exhaust system of
ventilation