0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
1K vizualizări5 pagini
It provides the historical interpretation of the rise of the state. They believed that the state is the outcome of naked force applied by the strong over the weak in order to subjugate them.
It provides the historical interpretation of the rise of the state. They believed that the state is the outcome of naked force applied by the strong over the weak in order to subjugate them.
It provides the historical interpretation of the rise of the state. They believed that the state is the outcome of naked force applied by the strong over the weak in order to subjugate them.
• It provides the historical interpretation of the
rise of the state • They believed that the state is the outcome of naked force applied by the strong over the weak in order to subjugate them. • They validated their stand through providing the examples in primitive societies – wars between tribes and classes resulted the emergence of stronger as their chief. • This theory was expounded by Oppenheimer, Gumplowicz, Edward Jenks etc.. Features or tenets • State came into being through physical coercion or compulsion ( wars begot the state) • Rulers or government is the outcome of human aggression or domination. • Superior physical force played important role • This aspect reflects among the traditional tribes, kingdoms or empires Oppenheim provides six stages of the emergence of state 1. Continuous fights and endless combat, killing and plundering – the winners took away the properties of the defeated one 2. Peasants make unsuccessful attempts to get away from the yoke of alien hunters and herdsmen- result was enslavement 3. In a third stage the tribes or the opposite parties realized the benefits of cooperation and the result was integration and assimilation 4. This stage the people learn to get along together and to fight against common enemy or external foes- the result was the feeling of oneness 5. In the fifth stage they realize or felt the necessity of some mechanism to settle internal disputes and quarrel by arbitration – it paved the way to government 6. Those who have the force became kings, deputies or counselors- law and order established in society- state has come into being. There are many examples like Alexander the great . Even after the creation of state the force plays important role in internal and external maintenance(order and security) Varied interpretations • Middle ages – church • Industrial society – colonialism • Exploitation – class struggle • Akbar, Napoleon or Hitler – force • The present day military leaders Evaluation • One cannot deny the importance of force because now also it is essential both internally and externally • But the theory is mistake in regarding force to be the sole factor which helped the emergence of state- there are other factors too play important role • Force cannot be permanent basis of the state, because with mere brute force no one can control the state for a long period – might without right be temporary • It may also lead to the glorification of war Conclusion: the realism or power approach emphasis the use and need of force.