Sunteți pe pagina 1din 8

WEEK 1

COVERT & OVERT


APPROACHES IN
TEACHING GRAMMAR

PRESENTED BY:
NURUL NABIHAH NASIR
NUR FITRAHANA
MUHAMMAD FAIZUL RIDZUAN
COVERT AND OVERT
APPROACHES
COVERT AND Overt APPROACHES IN
TEACHING GRAMMAR
COVERT GRAMMAR OVERT GRAMMAR
TEACHING TEACHING
• Teacher gets pupils involved
in using the structure • Teacher explicitly explains the
without drawing their rules when presenting the
new lang.
attention to grammatical
rules. • 2 options are available :
a) Deductive approach -
• Students attention is teacher presents the
focused on the activity and rule/pattern/generalization
not the grammar rules but and goes to the practices.
they have ample opportunity b) Inductive
approach/discovery
to practice the quest form. method - Students are first
given a numb of simple
• Example activities : Singing, sentences (contain target
storytelling and poem forms), then teacher guides
recitation the rules.
DEDUCTIVE
APPROACH
(RULE-DRIVEN
LEARNING)

Starts with the


presentation of a rule
and is followed by
examples in which
the rule is applied.
EXAMPLE OF DEDUCTIVE APPROACH

SUBJECT AND OBJECT PRONOUNS


The subject is the person or thing doing the action:
I left early
She went home Examples of rule
We said goodbye

The object is the person or thing receiving the action:


She telephoned me
I hit him Examples of rule
We saw her
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
It gets straight to the point and can Starting the lesson with a grammar
therefore be time saving. Allow more presentation may be off putting for
time on practices and application. some students. (do not have
sufficient metalanguage- language
used to talk about grammar
terminology)

Acknowledges the role of cognitive Students do not have much


processes in language acquisition. opportunity to get involve (teacher-
centered)

Confirms students’ expectations Explanation is seldom memorable.


about classroom learning particularly
for students with analytical learning
style.

Allows teacher to deal with language Encourages belief that learning a


points as they come up, rather than language is simply a case of knowing
having to prepare for them in the rules.
advance.
Students are given a
sample and the teacher
guides them in discovering
the grammar rules used in
the sample.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Make the rules more meaningful, May mislead students that the rule is
memorable and serviceable. the objective instead of the meaning.

Mental effort involved ensures a greater Time consuming


degree of cognitive depth (greater
memorability)

Students are actively involved. Students may hypothesis wrong rule

An approach which favours pattern Place heavy demands on teachers in


recognition and problem solving planning a lesson.
abilities.

Extra language practice (if problem Frustrates students who prefer simply to
solving is done collaboratively) be told the rules.

Self reliance.

S-ar putea să vă placă și