Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ANAYLYSIS
GENERAL FULL FACTORIAL
DESIGNS WITH k FACTORS
1
Analysis of General Design
Informal Methods
Observation Method
Ranking Method
Range Method
2
Total Number of Experiments – (Levels)Factors
(3)4 = 81
3
TYPES OF INTERACTIONS
TWO FACTOR 4C
2 6
THREE FACTOR 4C
3 4
FOUR FACTOR 4C
4 1
4
ANOVA
Table
For
Paging
Study
5
Component Sum of Percentage Degrees of Mean
squares of variation freedom square
Y 730.01 81
Y 681.21 1
6
MAIN EFFECTS
A 1.30 2
D 6.10 2
P 12.30 2
M 26.20 2
7
FIRST ORDER INTERACTIONS
Component Sum of Percentage of Degrees of Mean square
squares variation freedom
TOTAL 2.40 4.91 24 0.1
(FIRST ORDER
INTERACTIONS)
AD 0.07 4
AP 0.02 4
AM 0.03 4
DP 0.15 4
DM 1.96 4
PM 0.14 4
8
SECOND ORDER INTERACTIONS
Component Sum of Percentage Degrees of Mean
squares of variation freedom square
ADP 0.05 8
ADM 0.13 8
APM 0.04 8
DPM 0.26 8
9
THIRD ORDER INTERACTIONS
10
Simplified Model to represent the paging process
yijkl=µ+αi+βj+γk+δl+ξjl
µ Grand Mean
αi Main Effect of A
βj Main Effect of D
γk Main Effect of P
δl Main Effect of M
11
ERRORS IN THE PAGING STUDY
12
Normal
Quatile-Quantile
Plot
Of Residuals
13
14
15
INFORMAL METHODS
16
OBSERVATION METHOD
RANKING METHOD
RANGE METHOD
17
OBSERVATION METHOD
18
Example: Scheduler Design Study
3 Classes of jobs:
Word Processing
Interactive Data Processing
Background Data Processing
A Preemption NO YES
E Fairness OFF ON
20
21
SYMBOL FACTOR LEVEL -1 LEVEL 1
A Preemption NO YES
E Fairness OFF ON
22
23
SYMBOL FACTOR LEVEL -1 LEVEL 1
A Preemption NO YES
E Fairness OFF ON
24
25
SYMBOL FACTOR LEVEL -1 LEVEL 1
A Preemption NO YES
E Fairness OFF ON
26
RANKING METHOD
Similar to Observation method
A Preemption NO YES
E Fairness OFF ON
30
No A B C D E Tw Ti Tb
9 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 66.1
5 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 63.9
2 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 41.0
14 1 -1 1 1 -1 38.0
7 -1 1 1 -1 1 36.3
3 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 36.0
15 -1 1 1 1 -1 35.0
11 -1 1 -1 1 1 34.6
13 -1 -1 1 1 1 26.0
1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 25.0
8 1 1 1 -1 -1 23.0
12 1 1 -1 1 -1 23.0
16 1 1 1 1 1 22.0
4 1 1 -1 -1 1 15.7
6 1 -1 1 -1 1 13.2
10 1 -1 -1 1 1 9.2
31
SYMBOL FACTOR LEVEL -1 LEVEL 1
A Preemption NO YES
E Fairness OFF ON
32
No A B C D E Tw Ti Tb
3 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 21.0
7 -1 1 1 -1 1 20.2
15 -1 1 1 1 -1 17.2
11 -1 1 -1 1 1 15.7
1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 15.2
13 -1 -1 1 1 1 12.0
4 1 1 -1 -1 1 8.6
10 1 -1 -1 1 1 8.4
5 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 7.5
6 1 -1 1 -1 1 7.5
9 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 6.4
2 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 3.0
8 1 1 1 -1 -1 3.0
12 1 1 -1 -1 1 3.0
14 1 -1 1 1 -1 2.0
16 1 1 1 1 1 2.0
33
SYMBOL FACTOR LEVEL -1 LEVEL 1
A Preemption NO YES
E Fairness OFF ON
34
RANGE METHOD
Informal alternative:
Find the average response
Find the difference between max & min -> RANGE
35
LEVEL
FACTOR
1 2 3
36
55523 27 = 2056
37
8233 27 = 305
38
LEVEL Range of
FACTOR averages
1 2 3
39
The End
and
Thank You
40