forms. Some are stickers and used externally for cleaning and decorative proposes. They consist of large quantity of water, animal, plant/mineral oils, natural gums thickening agents, carbohydrates, aroma and flavouring agents in addition to protein hydrolysates, milk, beer, egg, plant extracts, etc. These product formulations are good sources of nutrients for microbes. Although, preservatives are added but due to complex nature of formulations, preservatives become less effective. Sometimes, creams and lotions are contaminated with pseudomonads, although with low levels of this group of organisms do not harm the individual but is applied to patients with skin infection/damage, situation may become worst. Some of the deteriorated cosmetics impart foul odours due to production of organic acids, fatty acids, amines, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide. Production of ammonia or acid leads to alter the pH, which may change the consistency and colour of the products by developing lumps and slime. Sometimes gas bubbles are also generated. Such products later on become unstable and form separate oil and water phases. Various lipids (oils, fats) are susceptible to microbial attack when dispersed in aqueous formulations after degradation. They give rise to glycerol and fatty acids. The fatty acids may further break down via β-oxidation to form odorous ketones. Many other additive chemicals particularly glycerol and sorbitol are used in toothpaste, etc. These allow various microbes to grow and secrete amylases, cellulases, etc. responsible for degradation of such carbon containing microbial nutrients. Shampoo and detergents often contain sodium dodecyl sulfate which act as substrates for enzyme alkyl sulphatases. The species of Pseudomonas, Citrobacter and Aerobacter secrete enzymes that breakdown the finished items and may generate unpleasant odour, particularly H2S. Microbiological contamination can spoil the product or the micro-organism may be pathogenic and hence potentially harmful to the user. Infections caused by contaminated cosmetics are relatively rare today, and the reported cases are all from hospitalized persons Contact allergy caused by ingredients in cosmetic products is a well-known problem. Approximately 6% of the general population has a cosmetic-related contact allergy. Cosmetic products can be contaminated in two ways: during manufacture or by the consumer during use. Contamination can cause undesired changes in the composition, odour, or colour of the products. Furthermore, the micro-organisms can be pathogenic and thereby pose a health risk for the consumer. Individual infections due to contaminated cosmetics are unlikely to be discovered or documented, and the reported infections are outbreaks in hospitals. Outbreaks of Burkholderia infections due to contaminated mouthwash have been reported from hospitalized individuals. An outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia in an intensive care unit was caused by an intrinsically contaminated moisturizing milk. Prior to the above, outbreaks of P. aeruginosa infections caused by contaminated cosmetics were reported, also from hospitalized individuals. Pathogenic micro-organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are frequently found in contaminated cosmetics. Anelich and Korsten found several genera in 58 different creams recalled in South Africa. The most frequently found genus was Pseudomonas (30%) followed by Enterobacter (17%), Aspergillus (13%), and Staphylococcus spp. (9%). Wong et al. found the pathogens P. aeruginosa and B. cepacia in 25 (45%) and 19 (33%) of the 56 different investigated products recalled in the USA. From 2005 until May 2008, the European Union recalled 24 different cosmetic products because of microbiological contamination, and at least 42% of the recalled products were contaminated with P. aeruginosa. Baird investigated 232 different baby products and 53 (23%) were contaminated. Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were among the isolated bacteria. Cosmetics are divided into two different categories: (i) products specifically intended for children under 3 years or to be used in the eye area and on mucous membranes and (ii) other products For products in category 1, the total viable counts for aerobic mesophilic micro-organisms must not exceed 100 Colony forming units (CFU)/g in 0.5 g of the product, and furthermore, the pathogenic micro-organisms Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and C. albicans must not be detectable in 0.5 g of the product. For products in category 2, total viable counts must not exceed 1000 CFU/g in 0.1 g, and the pathogens mentioned above must not be detectable in 0.1 g of the product. In order to minimize the microbial contamination, following actions are recommended in connection with a Microbiological Quality Management: ◦ Use of the principles of good manufacturing practice ◦ Application and verification of limit values ◦ Use of preservatives ◦ Preservatives in cosmetics: Important or harmful? Preservatives are essential in the production of cosmetics, because they kill or inhibit the growth of microorganisms. Without preservatives, most aqueous cosmetic products would have a shelf life of only 2 weeks. Only a few cosmetic products are stable without added preservatives - These include products with essential oils or a high level of alcohol as well as products that contain little or no water. Preservatives are therefore very important to keep cosmetics from spoiling and to inhibit the growth of potentially dangerous microorganisms. However, not all substances that can be used as a preservative are harmless to the consumer - Parabens for example have a hormonal effect; benzoic acid can cause pseudoallergic reactions. There are several different preservatives available but the cosmetic market is dominated by a few preservatives: parabens, formaldehyde, formaldehyde releasers, and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone. In addition, there are a couple of natural materials that contain substances that are said to have an antimicrobial effect. These include for example propolis, cinnamon bark, clove oil, allspice oil, nutmeg oil, ylangylang, rose oil and thyme. At the moment, there are no legally binding limit values for germ contents in cosmetics. According to a recommendation of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety of the European Commission, cosmetics should contain no more than 100 or 1.000 colony- forming units per gram, depending on the type of product. Certain pathogens such as Staphylococcus or E. coli are not allowed to be detectable at all. These are the test kits for the microbiological analysis of creams, lotions, lipsticks and other cosmetic products are now available at R-Biopharm. With these tests, you can measure the total bacteria count as well as the amount of E. coli, Coliforms and Staphylococcus aureus in cosmetics. Compact Dry TC (total aerobic count) - a simple and safe test procedure for determination and quantification of aerobic mesophilic count in foods, cosmetics or raw materials – as well as pharmaceutical raw materials. The aerobic count is an indicator for the microbial status of the production and environmental conditions. Compact Dry EC (Coliform bacteria and E. coli) - a simple and safe test procedure for determination and quantification of Coliform bacteria and E. coli in foods, cosmetics, water or raw materials – as well as pharmaceutical raw materials. Coliform bacteria are considered to be indicators for fecal contaminations. E. coli is the best known member of the group of Coliforms and considered as indicator for the presence of pathogenic organisms (e.g. Salmonella). Compact Dry CF (Coliform bacteria) - a simple and safe test procedure for determination and quantification of Coliform bacteria in foods, cosmetics or raw materials – as well as pharmaceutical raw materials.
Compact Dry X-SA (Staphylococcus aureus) - a
simple and safe test procedure for determination and quantification of Staphylococcus aureus in foods, cosmetics or raw materials – as well as pharmaceutical raw materials. S. aureus therefore is considered as indicator for poor personal hygiene. Thank you
(Advances in Molecular and Cellular Microbiology, 21) Timothy D McHugh-Tuberculosis - Laboratory Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies-CAB International (2013)