Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
KINDS OF LAW
GROUP 3
Aclan, Dorothy Jean M.
Areño, Chiles Megan M.
Briones, Dianne M.
De los Santos, DanielleAnne M.
Gaerlan, Shalom Christian A.
Leyble, John Emmanuel A.
Definitions
DIVINE LAW
– Law that emanates from God and may be sub-classified into eternal
law and divine positive (or revealed) law.
HUMAN LAW
– Law that emanates from man with the aid of reason.
Definitions
NATURAL LAW
– A priori (pre-existing) principles and rights coming from God (for
theists), reason (for non-theists) or both
– ‘innate rights’ which belong to everyone by nature, independent of all
juridical acts of experience
POSITIVE LAW
– Laws that are promulgated at a particular time, hence, a posteriori
(existing after), although the principles invoked may be a priori.
– ‘acquired’ rights founded upon juridical acts
DIVINE LAW
&
HUMAN LAW
DIVINE LAW
1. ETERNAL LAW – laws in the very nature of all created things and
implanted at the very moment of their creation by God.
2. DIVINE POSITIVE LAW – laws promulgated by God through his
prophets as found in the various Holy Books.
DIVINE LAW
– Natural Law believes that the foundation of what is ‘true’ and ‘good’
law can be accessed through the aid of human reason.
– Foundational Principles of True Law: a) morality and b) justice are
inherent in nature
– has this built-in moral compass that guides the lawmakers in their
attempt to craft laws for the common good
– Aristotle is believed to be the Father of the Natural Law Tradition
– Aristotle believes that natural justice is the mean between two
opposing vices
NATURAL LAW
“Lex iniusta non est lex” – an unjust law is not a true law
– Natural Law govern men in the state of nature, i.e. in the wild or
outside the state of civil society
– They are instinctive
– For Aquinas, natural law is nothing else than the rational creature’s
participation in the eternal law
– In other words, natural law is God’s eternal law applied to man, a law
both received by and existing in man
NATURAL LAW
“Lex iniusta non est lex” – an unjust law is not a true law
CHARACTERISTICS
– A law, regulation, or ordinance duly enacted by the state prohibits
certain acts.
– A person acts/omits to act in such a way that it breaks the law.
– The act/commission is seen by law and the community as harmful to
society.
– State takes the person to court where the offense is proved according
to the rules of criminal procedure.
CRIMINAL LAW
CLASSIFCIATION
– Economic offenses (e.g. robbery, theft)
– Offenses against the state (e.g. rebellion)
– Offenses against other people (e.g. murder, rape)
– Offenses against one’s self/victimless crimes (illegal gambling, illegal
possession of firearms)
CRIMINAL LAW
ELEMENTS
– Actus reus – the act or omission punishable by law
– Mens rea – intention to commit a crime
– Exception to mens rea --- malum prohibitum (strict liability)
– Causation – the act or omission must have been the cause of the
specific injury complained of.
CRIMINAL LAW
UNIQUE FEATURE
– The expression of the community’s hatred, fear, or contempt for the
convict which alone characterizes physical hardship as punishment.
CIVIL LAW
- The first codification was of the Twelve Tables (450 B.C.) and its
final form of codification was of the Justinian (528-34 A.D.)
PHILIPPINE LAW SYSTEM
– Adversarial System
– Court Procedure under common law
– Judges are like an “umpire”
– The image of impartiality and objectivity
– Such system is adopted by the Philippines
ROLE OF JUDGES IN
COMMON & CIVIL LAW SYSTEM
– Inquisitorial System
– Judges take the role of an “inquirer”
– Court Procedure tends to be informal
– Judges also acts in an active role to bring the parties into settlement
– Under Chinese Traditional Law, Judges act as a “mediator”
ROLE OF JUDGES IN THE
PHILIPPINES
– In the Philippines, Adversarial System
is adopted.
– Sometimes, Judges are given the
mandate to act as “Mediators” but the
responsibility to try the case is passed on
to another judge (“pairing judge”)
– The reason is to avoid jeopardizing
neutrality and impartiality
CHAPTER 13
LEGAL
PHILOSOPHY
SCHOOLS OF
THOUGHT
OVERLAP THESIS
No separation between law and morality.
It is not enough that a rule is sanctioned by
the State, it must be morally justified as
well.
Expressed in the writings of St. Thomas
Aquinas and Sir William Blackstone
NATURAL LAW THEORY
SOPHOCLES’ ANTIGONE
(Antigone and Oedipus at Colonus)
– Antigone was the daughter of
Oedipus. She chose to bury her rebel
brother Polynices against the laws of
Theban king Creon, and for defiance
she was imprisoned in cave.
– Antigone relied on the “supreme
law” as her source of justice when
she chosen to bury and perform last
rites in her rebel brother Polynices.
For that she violated the laws of the
King forbidding the burial of rebel to
the crown. Antigone thus followed
the “higher law.”
NATURAL LAW THEORY
– It was intended to fill the countless gaps in the statutes which leave
so many victims of wrongs helpless.
– It vouchsafed adequate legal remedy for that untold number of moral
wrongs which it is impossible for human foresight to provide for
specifically in the statutes.
CHAPTER 14
LEGAL
PHILOSOPHY
SCHOOLS OF
THOUGHT
LEGAL POSITIVISM
LEGAL POSITIVISM
LEGAL POSITIVISM
- Also known as “classical legal thought” which regards a law’s validity
in terms of social convention
- Natural law theorists argue that it is absurd to obey law qual law
(obey law just because it is the law) as there is nothing to justify such
act or obedience.
- In addition, they argue that legal positivism does not solve the
problem of punishing hard-core criminals who invoke the defense of
obeying an unjust law
LEGAL POSITIVISM
RULES PRINCIPLES
“All or nothing” choice. They represent various norms
and values in society.
They are not weighed or
They make up the community’s
balanced. moral fabric.
Either a rule applies to a case or When two principles conflict
not. such as whether to regulate
curriculum or go for academic
Generally, legal positivists are
freedom, the judge has to weight
rule bound.
and balance various principles.
LEGAL POSITIVISM
LEGAL REALISM
LEGAL REALISM
LEGAL REALISM
- the core belief is since law was created by man
- it is also subject to human imperfections, eccentricities, weaknesses and foibles.
- is “indeterminate”
- For Justice Benjamin Cardozo, it allows one to “predict” that a rule of conduct wil
be enforced by the courts if the authority of that rule is challenged.
JUDICIAL LEGISLATION
- whereby the latitude of judges to interpret that law gives them the power to
define, even “create” the law.
LEGAL REALISM
INSTRUMENTALISM
- is a philosophic position that laws, principles and ideas are “tools” or
“instruments” in resolving the puzzles of life in order to create
possibilities for human experience.
LEGAL INSTRUMENTALISM
- looks at law beyond the text or legislative intent;
- believes that in the interpretation of the law there should be freedom
and creativity given to the judges
- this theory is justified in order to assure that the law serves the
higher purposes of good public policy and social interests.
LEGAL REALISM
LEGAL FORMALISM
- follows the highly syllogistic form of legal reasoning. There is much
emphasis on the formal rules of logic to arrive at a decision or holding
of the case.
LEGAL REALISM
- reasons that legal formalism greatly undercuts the authority of judges
to decide a case. A case is much more complex and nuanced than a
simplistic if mechanical application of the syllogistic rules of formal
logic.
LEGAL REALISM
DISCRETION THESIS
- judges unwittingly make “new law” in deciding disputes in the sense
that a judge is often influenced by his political, religious or moral
convictions and not strictly by legal considerations;
- judges’ decisions are often influenced by their personal beliefs and
ideological upbringing.
JUDICIAL LEGISLATION
Judicial legislation is frowned upon as inimical to the constitution, yet some
form of judicial discretion is given to the court under Art. 9 of the Civil Code
which provides that : “[n]o judge or court shall decline to render judgment by
reason of the silence, obscurity or insufficiency of the law”
In another case, while the law then applicable under the old Civil Code does
not provide for reimbursement to the wife, the Supreme Court ruled that the
wife should be “paid” for the “value of the old buildings” which were her
paraphernal or separate property, and which were demolished to pave way
for the construction of a new building that ultimately benefited the spouses’
conjugal property.
LEGAL REALISM