Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(NEXT)
PANKAJ R. CHANDAR, Ph.D., P.E. 1
2-4 Solution:
x 0.025
R , RA 1.667 x10 - 4 /A
k A 150 A
RB
2 0.075 0.01
30 A A
0.05 0.001
RC
50 A A
RD
2 0.075 0.0043
70 A A
1
R RA RC 2.667 x10 - 2
1 1
RB RD
T 370 66
q 11400 W
R 2.667 x10 - 2
(NEXT)
q
h (T3 T ) 15 (55 - 40) 225 W 2
A m
q
kM
1000 400
x M 0.24 m
A x M
q
kF
400 55
x F 0.0644 m
A x F
2
d T q
2
0
dx k
dT q
T1 T2 x C1
dx k
L L q x2
T - C1 x C 2
X 2k
Boundary Conditions:
1) at X= -L, T=T1 2) at X=L, T=T2
q x2
T - C1 x C 2
2k
The general solution is
Substituting boundary conditions yields:
q T T1 T T2
T ( L2 X 2 ) 2 X 1
2k 2L 2
For temp. distributi on on the wall.
2k 2
5x10 5 (0.015) 2 200 50
127.8 C
2 (20) 2
Boundary Conditions :
4
2 d T
q R k 4 R
3
3 d r
dT qr
1) 2) T TW @ r R
d r 3k
d T q R2
3) 0 , then C1 TW
d r 6k
C2 0
T - TW
q
6k
R 2
r2
PANKAJ R. CHANDAR, Ph.D., P.E. 12
2-46 A stainless steel sphere [k = 16 W/m ºC] having a
diameter of 4 cm is expesed to a convection
environment at 20ºC, h = 15 W/m2 ºC. Heat is generated
uniformly in the sphere at a rate of 1.0 MW/m3.
Calculate the steady state temperature for the center of
the sphere.
From Prob. 2 - 45
T - TW
q
6k
R2 r2
1x10 6 (0.02) 2
T0 - TW 4.17 C
6 (16)
4
q qV q R 3 h 4r 2 (TW - T )
3
1x10 6 (0.02)
TW - T 444.4 C
3 (15)
T0 444.4 4.17 448.6 C
1 1 W
U 32.11
R 3.114 x10 -2
m 2 C
W d 2.5
k 204 , L L 15
m C
C
4 4
16.25 cm
150.0254 2
1
h P
m 2
3.43
k A 204 0.025
m LC 3.430.1625 0.5573
q h Pk A θ 0 tanh m L C
1
(0.025) 2 2
150.025( 204) 260 16 tanh 0.5573
4
42.41 W
W
k 210
m C
t
LC L 6.4 0.8 7.2 mm
2
r2C r1 L C 1.25 0.72 1.97
r2C
1.576
r1
q 0.91275 0.02552 0.01252 100 30
14.83 W
PANKAJ R. CHANDAR, Ph.D., P.E. 18
2-118 Consider aluminum circumferential fins with r1 = 1.0
cm, r2 = 2.0 cm, and thicknesses of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0
mm. The convection coefficient is 160 W/m2 ºC.
Compare the heat transfers for six 1.0 mm fins, three
2.0 mm fins, and two 3.0 mm fins. What do you
conclude? Repeat for h = 320 W/m2 ºC.
k = 204 W/m ºC
1.0 mm Fin LC = 1.05
1 cm
h 2
3
0.0105 2
3 160
LC 2
k A M 2040.001 0.0105
0.294
f 0.88
q 6160 0.02052 0.012 2T 0.88
1.7 T
(NEXT)
PANKAJ R. CHANDAR, Ph.D., P.E. 19
2-3. A composite wall is formed of a 2.5 cm copper
plate, a 3.2mm layer of asbestos, and a 5 cm layer
of fiberglass. The wall is subjected to an overall
temperature difference of 560 °C . Calculate the
heat-flow per area through the composite
structure.
q 560 W
419
A 0.025 3.2 *103 0.05 m2
386 0.16 0.038
44000 260 38
A 0.05 0.025
386 0.038
A 130.4m 2
q 45 W
69.78 2
A 0.10 0.025 m
0.69 0.05
q T
A R
300 175 80
A 0.04 0.015
386 0.038
A 1.247m 2
4ππk(i T0 ) W
q (k 204 )
1 1
mC
ri r0
(4)π4)π(20100 - 50)
5127W
1 1
0.02 0.04
qAL hPL(Tw T )
(35.3 *106 )(0.025) 2 (4000)( 4)(0.025)(Tw 20)
Tw 75.16C
d 2θ hP
2
θ0
dx kA
let m hP , T 38 L 30cm h 17
kA
122.7W
1
q hPkA 0 [( 24) (0.025)(385) (0.025) ] 2 (150 20)
2
10.05W
kA m
ηf 0.75
W
q (0.75)(20) (ππ)(0.15)200 15) 833 depth
m
mdepth
q (0.68)(20) (0.10008)(200 40) 217.8W/m
kAm
r2c 0.305 f 0.68
q (0.68)(200 )(2) (0.0305 2 - 0.012 )(150 - 20) 92.2W
f 0.92
q 3160 0.0212 0.012 2T 0.92
0.95 T
3.0 mm Fin LC = 1.15 cm 1
3 h 2
LC 2 0.186
k A M
f 0.95
q 2160 0.02152 0.012 2T 0.95
0.69 T
Conclusion: Several thin fins are better than a few thick
fins. More heat transfer for the same weight of fins.
PANKAJ R. CHANDAR, Ph.D., P.E. 56