DARTS

DISASTER
ASSISTANCE ROVING
TOILET SYSTEM
 THE PROBLEM
SANITATION
IN PLACES HIT BY A
DISASTER
AND PLACES WITHOUT
SEWERAGE SYSTEM
LEADS TO MORE
PROBLEMS
HEALTH AND DIGNITY
THE SOLUTION
DEVELOPING A TOILET
SYSTEM
FOR DISASTER-STRICKEN
AREAS AND OTHER PLACES
WHICH LACK SANITATION
O NO WATER NEEDED
O CAN BE USED BY MANY
O CLEAN AND EASY TO USE
THE SOLUTION
USE OF ODOR-
ABSORBING MATERIALS
FOR COVERING FECES
AFTER USE
O SAWDUST
O CHARCOAL
O COMMERCIAL
 THE S.O.P.
1. IS IT ACCEPTABLE IN:
A. DESIGN/PORTABILITY?
B. EFFICIENCY AS TOILET SYSTEM?
C. CAPACITY/DURABILITY?
2. WHICH TREATMENT IS THE MOST
EFFECTIVE IN ODOR ABSORPTION?
3. IS THERE A SIGNIFICANT
DIFFERENCE AMONG THE
TREATMENTS?
 THE METHODS
CONSTRUCTION OF DARTS
 USE CYCLE
A. FOR USE

ENTERING DEFECATING COVERING

THE TENT FECES WITH
ODOR
ABSORBER
 USE CYCLE
B. FOR DISPOSAL

TRANSPORTING REMOVING THROWING IT

DARTS THE STORAGE INTO THE HOLE
BAG
 THE SURVEY
ACCEPTABILITY TEST
RATE DARTS IN TERMS OF
DESIGN/PORTABILITY, EFFICIENCY, AND
CAPACITY/DURABILITY:
5- EXCELLENT
4- VERY GOOD
3- GOOD
2- FAIR
1- POOR
 THE SURVEY
ODOR TEST
HOW SMELLY ARE THE TREATMENTS?

1. PIG WASTE 2. W/ SAWDUST 3. W/ CHARCOAL 4. W/

ONLY5- COMPLETELY 4- GENERALLY COMMERCIAL

3- MODERATELY2- SLIGHTLY
1- NOT SMELLY
THE RESPONDENTS
ACCEPTABILITY TEST
20 STUDENTS
10 HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS
ODOR TEST
20 STUDENTS
 THE DATA GATHERED
ACCEPTABILITY TEST RATINGS
WEIGHTED MEAN AND DESCRIPTIONS
DESIGN/PORTABILITY
4.63 EXCELLENT
EFFICIENCY
4.20 EXCELLENT
CAPACITY/DURABILITY
4.60 EXCELLENT
 THE DATA GATHERED
ODOR TEST RATINGS
PIG WASTE ONLY
1.10 COMPLETELY SMELLY
WITH CHARCOAL
2.95 MODERATELY SMELLY
WITH SAWDUST
3.95 SLIGHTLY SMELLY
WITH COMMERCIAL
3.60 SLIGHTLY SMELLY
 THE DATA GATHERED
KRUSKAL-WALLIS TEST
COMPARISON OF MEAN RANKS
1. WITH CHARCOAL
2. WITH COMMERCIAL
3. WITH SAWDUST
4. PIG WASTE ONLY
TEST STATISTICS
P-VALUE(0.00)<α(0.05)
 CONCLUSIONS
1. SINCE ALL DESCRIPTIONS ARE
EXCELLENT, DARTS IS ACCEPTABLE
IN TERMS OF DESIGN/PORTABILITY,
EFFICIENCY AND
CAPACITY/DURABILITY.
 CONCLUSIONS
2. CHARCOAL TREATMENT IS THE
MOST EFFECTIVE IN ODOR
ABSORPTION, FOLLOWED BY
COMMERCIAL AND THEN SAWDUST.
 CONCLUSIONS
3. THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT
DIFFERENCE IN THE MEAN ODOR
TEST RATINGS OF THE
TREATMENTS.