Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
By Prof. S.Sriram
Unit-Based
Drivers
PRODUCTS
Goodmark Company
Scented Regular
Card Card Total
Units produced p.a., 20,000 200,000 --
Prime costs $ 160,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,660,000
Direct labor hours 20,000 160,000 180,000
Goodmark Company (continued)
Predetermined
Overhead Rate = Budgeted overhead Expected activity
Machine hours:
Scented cards 2,0008,00010,000
Regular cards 8,00072,00080,000
Total 10,00080,00090,000
===== ==========
Goodmark Company –
Departmental Rates
Overhead Rates:
Cutting Rate = Budgeted OH / Expected DLH
= $216,000/160,000
= $1.35 per DLH
Printing Rate = Budgeted OH / Expected MH
= $504,000/80,000
= $6.30 per MH
Goodmark Company – Unit Cost
Computation: Departmental Rate
Scented Regular
Prime costs $160,000$1,500,000
Overhead costs:
($1.35 x 10,000) + ($6.30 x 8,000) 63,900---
($1.35 x 150,000) + ($6.30 x 72,000) --- 656,100
Total mfg. costs $223,900$2,156,100
Units of production 20,000 200,000
Unit cost $ 11.20$ 10.78
Today’s manufacturers are working in an
increasingly complex environment.
Manufacturing Environment
Manufacturing Characteristics Trend
Use of Advanced Technology
Product Complexity
Capital Intensiveness
How do we control
these costs?
Material
Manufacturing
Cost
Components
Illustration - Part 1
Product A Product B
Illustration - 3
Product A Product B
Product complexity
Low High
High
Overcosted ?
Production Accurate
Accurate
Volume Costs
Costs
? Undercosted
Low
D
Traditional View
‘Resources are consumed to produce products and services’
ABC view
and
COST OF RESOURCES
ACTIVITIES
Costs assigned
using activity drivers
PRODUCTS
Traditional Vs ABC
Traditional ABC
Traditional, Volume-Based
Product-Costing System
• Aerotech produces three complex printed circuit
boards referred to as Mode I, Mode II, and Mode III.
• The following information is obtained from company
records:
Traditional, Volume-Based
Product-Costing System
Additional information includes:
Mode I Mode II Mode III
Dire ct m ate rials $ 50.00 $ 90.00 $ 20.00
Dire ct labor (h r/board) 3 4 2
Se tu p tim e (h r/ru n ) 10 10 10
Mach in e time (h r/board) 1 1.25 2
Traditional, Volume-Based
Product-Costing System
Traditional, Volume-Based
Product-Costing System
With these product costs, Aerotech established target
selling prices (Cost × 125%).
209.00 x 1.25
Traditional, Volume-Based
Product-Costing System
Aerotech wishes to see what target selling prices would
be suggested when using activity-based costing.
Product-
Unit Batch Sustaining Facility
Level Level Level Level
Machinery Setup Engineering Facility
cost pool cost pool cost pool cost pool
$1,212,600 $3,000 $700,000 $507,400
Product-
Unit Batch Sustaining Facility
Level Level Level Level
Machinery Setup Engineering Facility
cost pool cost pool cost pool cost pool
$1,212,600 $3,000 $700,000 $507,400
More
Cost
Pools
Product- Exh.
5-5
Unit Batch Sustaining Facility
Level Level Level Level
Machinery Setup Engineering Facility
cost pool cost pool cost pool cost pool
$1,212,600 $3,000 $700,000 $507,400
Receiving/Inspection
cost pool $200,000
Material-Handling
cost pool $600,000
Quality-Assurance
cost pool $421,000
Packaging/Shipping
cost pool $250,000
Exh.
Maintenance Lubrication
Various overhead
costs related Depreciation Electricity
to machinery Computer Support Calibration
Activity
cost Machinery Cost Pool
pool Total budgeted cost = $1,212,600
Exh.
Cost
Assignment
Exh.
Calculation of
total setup cost
Activity
cost Setup Cost Pool
pool Total budgeted cost = $3,000
Exh.
Cost
Assignment
Exh.
Activity
cost Engineering Cost Pool
pool Total budgeted cost = $700,000
Exh.
Allocate based
on engineering Engineering Cost Pool
transactions Total budgeted cost = $700,000
Cost
Assignment
Exh.
Activity
cost Facility Cost Pool
pool Total budgeted cost = $507,400
Exh.
Cost
Assignment
Product Cost from ABC
Here are the new product costs so far . . .
Other Overhead Costs
Re c e ivin g a n d In s pe c t ion Cos t P ool
Board Ove rh e ad × % ÷ U n its = Cos t/Un it
Mode I $ 200,000 × 6% ÷ 10,000 = $ 1.20
Mode II 200,000 × 24% ÷ 20,000 = 2.40
Mode III 200,000 × 70% ÷ 4,000 = 35.00
VA = Valued-added activity
NVA = Non-value-added activity
Non-Value-Added Costs
Our goal is to reduce or eliminate the non-value-added activities
VA = Valued-added activity
NVA = Non-value-added activity