Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
COMMUNICATION
ACCORDING TO
CONTEXT
1) INTRAPERSONAL
COMMUNICATION
The Latin prefix intra- means within or inside.
Means talking to oneself
Some label it as self or inner talk, inner
monologue, inner dialogue
For psychologists, it is self-verbalization or
self-statement.
HOW TO GAUGE IF IT IS NORMAL TO
TALK TO YOURSELF:
FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
Task-oriented groups
Relation-oriented groups
Emergent groups
ADVANTAGES OF SMALL GROUP
COMMUNICATION
Facilitatespooling of the resources
Increases motivation
Makes identification of errors easier
Decisions are better received
Provides rewards of working with others
DISADVANTAGES OF SMALL GROUP
COMMUNICATION
Encourages laziness
Conflicting personal and group goals
Domination by a few
Stubbornness leads to deadlock
Riskier decisions are made
Takes longer to reach decisions
3) EXTENDED
COMMUNICATION
Involves the use of electronic media
Use of television, radio, phone, video,
internet apps and other technological
means
With the use of electronic media,
messages are transmitted quickly.
4) ORGANIZATIONAL
COMMUNICATION
This
type focuses on the role that communication plays in
organizational contexts.
Foran organization to be successful, a system of
communication should be out in place. A set of rules or
standards for communication protocol should be made
clear so that interaction patterns are established.
Forindividuals, you should be equipped with the needed
oral and written communication skills that the
organization expects you to possess.
2 TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE:
FORMAL – allows communication to take place
via designated channels of message flow
between positions in the organization.
1. Initiating
Forming immediate and lasting impression
which happens in the first 30 seconds
Looking for signals that may impel us to initiate
the conversation
Searching for appropriate conversation opener
-”It’s
cool here, Hi, I am Jessie.”
-”Would you like some coffee?”
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
2. Experimenting
Findingout more about the other person
Should not involve teaching, preaching,
and impressing
Very casual and superficial
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
3. Intensifying
Assumes that both parties are interested
Becoming “good friends”
Dating stage (romantic)
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
4. Integrating
Two individuals are identified as a pair or
couple or as a “package”
Fusion of “You” and “I” really takes place
Divulge more and more private information
Share a song or a project
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
5. Bonding
Commitment has been formally contracted
and institutionalized
Relationship is guided by specific rules and
regulations
May cause initial discomfort or rebellion
Fully integrated and intense communication
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
6. Differentiating
Instead of continuing to emphasize “we”,
interactants attempt to reestablish an “I” orientation.
> How are we different?
Tend to have a more individualized character
> From “our friends” to “my friends”
> From “our child” to “my child”
> “Do we always have listen to that CD?”
If it persists, it can signal a trouble in a relationship.
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
7. CIRCUMSCRIBING
Quantity and quality of communication between
interactants decrease.
Topics discussed decrease in breadth and depth.
Fewer intimate disclosures are made.
Characterized by lack of energy, shrinking interest, and a
general feeling of exhaustion.
Do not answer much the calls or messages.
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
8. STAGNATING
Happens when circumscribing continues
Interactants feel that they no longer need to
relate to each other
> “Better to say nothing.”
Silence is the hallmark of the communication
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
9. AVOIDING
Interactants go out of their way to be apart
Relating face-to-face or voice-to-voice becomes so
unpleasant
“I do not want to see you any more.”
“I do not want to talk to you any more.”
End of relationship is in sight
In situations when no obvious or natural break
occurs, termination begins.
Stages of Interpersonal Relationships
(Mark Knapp and Anita Vangelisti (2000)
10. TERMINATION
Relationship
ends
Can end cordially or bitterly
Can be pleasant or unpleasant
Signal Statements
“Well, we sure had some good times at first.”
“We can’t just see each other again.”
“Do not call me ever again.”
“I hope I never see you again.”
Examples are breakups or separation and death