Sunteți pe pagina 1din 22

Journal of Applied Sciences 12 (20): 2164-2171, 2012

ISSN 1812 -5654 / DOI: 10.3923/jas.2012.2164.2171


by Suhaib Yahya Kasim, Al-Darzi, and Usman A. Ameer

PRESENTED BY INDAH SUCIHATI FAEBBA


1620922012

PROGRAM STUDI S2 TEKNIK SIPIL


FAKULTAS TEKNIK
UNIVERSITAS ANDALAS/2018
Introduction
• THE HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE (HSC)
a) New product and characteristic differ from the of normal strength concrete.
b) Better structures
c) Stronger and more durable
d) Potentially cost less to built and maintain.

• OTHER STUDY EXPERIMENTAL


a) the fine silica fume and PP (Polypropylene) fiber greatly improved the
comprossive strength of foamed concrete.
b) adding PP fiber significantly improved the splitting tensile strength and
drying shrinkage resistance.
c) the effect of concrete type on the behaviour of Laminated Veneer Lumber
(LVL)-concrete floor T-beams was experimentally investigated among
several parameters.
Introduction
• This paper about study investigation
a. The effects of increasing the compressive strength of concrete deck on
the deflection at midspan and slip at ends of steel-concrete composite
beam.
b. The effect of variation of concrete compressive strength, slip and yield
strength of four group of steel concrete composite beam.
c. The effect of adding steel fibers to concrete deck on deflection and slip
of steel-concrete composite beam.
d. The main objective of the study is to investigate the effects of increasing
the compressive strength of the concrete deck on the flexural
resistance, midspan deflection, and slip at ends of steel-concrete
composite beam
Material and Methedology
• Material Preparation

Different mixing proportion

Using Addative

• Locally available cement


• maximum agregate size 20 mm
• the cement, agregate, and water used in
concrete are tested and prepared before
construction of composite beam sample
Material and Methedology
• Material Tested
Material and Methedology
• Material

a. The final mix proportions (cement, sand, gravel/water) used with a


slump of (100mm) for each type.
b. For normal concrete design with normal comprassive strenght
c. For High strength concrete (HSC) and High strength fiber concrete
(HSFC) design with the compressive strength exceedin 40 MPa
d. the fiber were in 10mm sieves put and added gradually (spread) to
concrete, and it will be tested in tweleve standard concrete cubes,
150x150x150 mm, divided into four group with four fiber precentage,
0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0 %. the optimum fiber percentage of 2.0 % choosen to
be used in investegation.
e. the last group ah HSCC , a high strength concrete as stated by the
ACI-Code,2011.
Material and Methedology
• Material

a. The uniaxial tensile test of six strips taken from flange and web of the
steel section (steel yield strength fy= 341 MPa and ultimate strength
fu= 475 MPa.
b. Diameters the reinforcement bars used, 10 mm (a yield strength fy =
485 MPa and ultimate strength of (fu=655Mpa).
c. Modulus of Elasticity Es = 198850 MPa for steel section and Er =
197660 Mpa for steel reinforcement.
d. A headed stud mechanical shear connector (12.5 mm diameter and
80 mm height) are used to connect the steel section to the concrete
deck.
e. The connectors which show an average yield strength fy= 472 MPa
and ultimate strength of fu = 667 MPa
f. The res modulus of elasticity of stud connector , Est = 208110 MPa.
Material and Methedology
• Material Tested
Material and Methedology
• Material Tested

the optimum fiber percentage of


2.0 % choosen to be used in
investegation.
Material and Methedology
• Material Tested
Material and Methedology
• Sample

the composite beam having a total


length of 1600 mm
Material and Methedology
• Sample construction

a. A total of sample test : 12 composite beam (divided into four groups,


each of three beams)
b. The present study considering the effects of using different
compossive strength of cornet with or wthout fibers and their effect on
slip and deflection of composite beam.
c. The connectors (headed stud) are welded to flange to the steel beam
with spaced at 150 mm C/C .
d. Reinforcement mesh consists of a minimum number of rebars with
100 mm diameter wich are placed at the bottom of concrete flange for
both longitudinal and transverse direction.
e. The concrete flanges cast by using wooden forms, and surface of the
beams were kept moist with wet burlap for 3 days.
f. The wood forms are then removed and the specimens are cured in an
air-dry condition until testing
Material and Methedology
• Testing Method

•• The
The composite
test setup beam
generates
speciment
a two are
shear
supported
zones at near
its the
ends,
ends
withand
a span
pure
1500
bending
mmzone
between
in thespan.
middle of the simply supported beam.
•• AThe
500slip
kN at
hydraulic
ends ofjackthe is
beam
usedand
to apply
deflection
a twoatpoint
mid-span
load with
arearecorded
monotonic
using threeload
transducers
applied atwith
thean
topaccuracy
of concrete
of 0.0001
flange mm.
Result and Discussion
• Model Failure
Result and Discussion
• Result

Deflection at mid-span of the beams

• NC grpup --> the deflection started at


the early stages of loading
• HSFC group --> the deflection started
from the beginning of test but the values
are less than NC group.
• HSC group --> the deflection started at
load stage of about 45% of the ultimate
load.
• HSCC group --> the deflection started
at load stage of about 23% of the
ultimate load.
Result and Discussion
• `Load-deflection curve
Result and Discussion
• Result

Slip at the end of the beam

• NC grpup --> the slips at the early


stages of loading
• Other group --> the slips are delayed to
an advanced stages of loading
• HSCC group -->gives considerable slip
resistance compared with the other
groups.
• The result show that slip resistance are
gained at different load stages after
crack taking place.
Result and Discussion
• `Load-slip curve
Result and Discussion
• Result

Effect of concrete compressive strength

• the
Usingdeflection
effect
effect
the adding
formula
ofat concrete
midfiber
specified
spanto concrete
compressive
of bythe AISC-
beam is
strength
at
also
LRFD ultimate
investigated
foris composite
highlighted
stage bybeam,
by
are
comparing
comparing
decreased
the result
the
compareddeflection
average
shows that
values
with the
group
of and
deflection
AISC
: slip
NC value
byformulas
andabout
slip
for
groups
43.3%
for
overestimate
groupsand
: NC,HSC
24,1%
HSC,
the
andultimate
and
for
HSFC
groups
HSCC strength
HSC and by
• about
HSCC.
Noticed
The 28, from
result 20shows
andthe8.3that% for groups
result,
the that NC,
addition the
of
• HSC, andofHSFC,
compressive
the
fiber slip
enhance groups butNC
strength
the slip underestimate
resitance.
hasanda great
HSCeffectthe
are
• ultimate
of
about
Theultimate
0.01strength
deflectionstrength
mmwouldfor groups
shown that
not beHSCC load with
a enhanced 180
• difference
kN
Theadding
by ultimate - 0.1%
fiberstrength of the beams are
• the
increased
slip of group
comparingHSCC with
started
group a load
NC by of
about 220 26.6kNand 61.7% for group HSC
and HSCC
Result and Discussion
• `Load-slip and Load-deflection curve
Conclusions
• The resistance of deflection of the composite beam would be
increased by increasing compressive strength or adding fiber to
concrete comparing with the normal strength.
• Slips at in the end of the beam are greatly effect by increasing
the compressive strength.
• The slip decreased by increasing the compressive strength
• The exprerimental investiagations giving a lesser values than
that calculated by AISC's formula for the three groups (NC, HSC,
and HSFC) and almost the same result is obtained for groups
NSCC.
• Adding steel fiber to concrete deck would decrease the slip
between the concrete and steel.

S-ar putea să vă placă și