Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT
METHODS
Authentic / Performance Assessments
Portfolio Assessment
Curriculum - Application of
relevant knowledge
Assessment
Performance
Supplementary Knowledge
Assessment
and skills
Continuum
Student – constructed
Authenticity
Performance, Authenticity,
and Curriculum in
An assessment task
HIGH
LOW
LOW
Selecting assessment tasks that are clearly aligned or
connected to what has been taught
Assessment of student’s
behavior or skills based on
student’s work that the
teacher and student both
believe represents evidence of
learning.
Purposes of Documentation Evaluation
Portfolios
A form of authentic assessment in which students
are required to demonstrate the integration of
knowledge and skills they have acquired
Profiles
Developed by expert teachers and provide
clearly articulated criteria
Marking
Judgment of one person by
another
• Be sure to mark all assigned work
• Return work promptly or as soon as possible
• If possible, personally comment on the test
How to • Provide specific comments about students’
work
improve • Mark the students’ work, not the student
marking? • Avoid sarcasm, belittling or ridiculing remarks
• Teachers must make a personal decision
whether to have students repeat their work
Grading
The more variables that are included in a grade, the less effective it
is as an indication of achievement
Teachers should be skilled in using assessment results when making decisions about
individual students, planning teaching, developing curriculum, and improving schools.
Standard for Teacher Competence in student
assessment
Teachers should be skilled in developing valid pupil grading
procedures that use pupil assessments.
Purpose Sample Knowledge Assess thinking skills Assess knowledge Assess ability to
with maximum and / or mastery of during instruction translate knowledge
efficiency and a structure of and understanding
reliability knowledge into action
Typical Exercise MCQ Writing task Open – ended Written prompt or
True/FAlse question natural event
Completion framing the kind of
Matching Type performance
required
Comparison of Various Types of Assessments
Objective Test Essay Test Oral Question Performance
Assessment
Student’s response Read, evaluate, Organize, compose Oral answer Plan, construct, and
select deliver original
response
Scoring Count correct Judge Determine Check attributes
answers understanding correctness of present. Rate
answer proficiency
demonstrated, or
describe
performance via
anecdote
Comparison of Various Types of Assessments
Objective Test Essay Test Oral Question Performance
Assessment
Major Advantage Efficiency - can Can measure Joins assessment Provides rich
administer many complex cognitive and instruction evidence of
items per unit of outcomes performance skills
testing time
Potential sources of Poorly written Poorly written Poor questions, Por exercises, too
inaccurate items, overemphasis exercises, writing students’ lack of few samples of
assessment on recall of facts, skill confounded willingness to performance, vague
poor test taking with knowledge of respond, too few criteria, poor rating
skills, failure to content, poor questions procedures, poor
sample content scoring procedures test conditions
representatively
Comparison of Various Types of Assessments
Objective Test Essay Test Oral Question Performance
Assessment
Keys to Success Clear test blueprint Carefully prepared Clear questions, Carefully prepared
or specifications writing exercises; representative performance
that match preparation of sample of questions exercises; clear
instruction, skill in model answers, to each student, performance
writing an item, time to read and adequate time expectations;
time to write items score provided for student careful, thoughtful
response rating, time to rate
performance