Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Mood
Interpersonal
Meaning
Modality
Realization of Interpersonal Meaning
Mood
Interpersonal
Meaning
Modality
Mood
• Two components that are essential to the mood is
subject and finite.
• Subject is always expressed by nominal group, while
finite is always expressed in verbal group.
• Together, the two components have a vital role in
carrying out the interpersonal functions of the clause as
exchange.
Mood
Declarative
Indicative Polar
Types of Interrogative
Mood Wh
Imperative
Finite Only
(3 GIA) …there is an instruction card available beneath your…
(4 LNI) the safety information card of this is available in your seat pocket
aircraft
Subject Finite
Residue
Mood
GIA = Garuda Indonesia
LNI = Lion Air
Imperative Mood
Garuda Indonesia Lion Air
Residue Only Finite Only Residue Only Finite Only
14 0 18 1
Total 14 Clauses Total 19 Clauses
Finite Only
(5 LNI) …do not hesitate to let us know
Finite Predicator Complement
Mood Residue
Residue Only
(6 GIA) …pull the mask towards you
(7 LNI) …pull the mask toward you
Predicator Complement
Residue
13 3 14 0 1 19 7 18 1
Total: 1
Total: 16 Clauses Total: 14 Clauses Total: 26 Clauses Total: 19 Clauses
Clause
CONCLUSION
• Both airlines predominantly provide informative messages in the
safety demonstration announcements. This tendency is seen from the
declarative mood which found as the major mood types in the
announcement texts, which means the speakers or writers of the two
texts intend to give or supply information to the hearers or readers.
• The significant difference between the mood system of the two
airlines’ safety demonstration announcement is that there is an
interrogative mood in Garuda Indonesia’s, while there are none found
in Lion Air’s.
SUGGESTION
• The data which are to be analyzed in further studies can be in other
languages in order to find out the interpersonal meaning of safety
demonstration announcements in other languages compared to the
ones in English.
• Further studies can include the analysis of other domains of
interpersonal meaning, such as polarity or modality.
• As the results of this study provide statistical information about the
mood system of safety demonstration announcements, it can be
used as basic data for any further research with similar topic.
REFERENCES ON SFL
• Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1995). Making Sense of Functional
Grammar (2nd ed.). Sydney: Gerd Stabler.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1985).An introduction to Functional Grammar.
London: Edward Arnold
• Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s
Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Edward
Arnold.
• Sujatna, E. T. S. (2013). Understanding Systemic Functional
Linguistics. Bandung: Unpad Press.
THANK YOU