• Choosing our life direction is only the first part
of the story and not the hardest part. • The more challenging part of this freedom is the responsibility that comes with it. • Without responsibility, the exercise of freedom by asserting one’s own personal choices is no different from acting like a selfish teenager. • Kierkegaard speaks of this kind of freedom of self-choice as one that can only be completed when it is performed before another person (in his case, it was before an adjudicating God who will demand of him to account for all his actions on the Last Day.) • Our commitment to the choices that would direct our life path is strengthened by knowing that there is someone out there gazing at us, checking whether or not we are consistent with our choice • Kierkegaard who has set out a direct and radical relationship with God, the process of realizing oneself is grounded in the recognizing gaze of the great Judge. • The exercise of freedom is a social act.
• It is not simply about the assertion of one’s
preferences −− live and let-live −− but it is the assertion of one’s preferences with a view to the consequences this has on oneself and on others. • A responsible exercise of freedom takes the following question in mind:
Am I aware of the consequences of my choices as
soon as I act on them? Will I be able to answer to the grievances of those who will be hurt by these consequences? Will I be able to face people with a dignified and resolved stance when I am chastised, criticized for my choice? Will I be prepared to give a reasonable answer to their questions? If I have not even thought of the consequences of the choice I make, then I am being reckless. If I run away from the consequences and refuse to face people in the aftermath of those consequences, then I have failed in consolidating my personality. In other words, I remain to be nothing. • Comes from two words: response and ability
• Responsibility is the ability to respond.
Respond to a need or to a call for help, for understanding, for love, for forgiveness. Freedom is not freedom unless there is another who recognizes it.
I may be free to do everything I want when I am
alone in another planet, but if there is no one to recognize it, what is the point of asserting it? The recognizing gaze of another exerts a gentle pressure on me to solidify my choices into a lifelong commitment of acting on it (Habermas, 1992)
Studies have shown the effectiveness of making
promises of conversion when it is done before a witnessing body (Baumeister and Tierney, 2012) Exercise of freedom is an embodied action. Freedom is not just an idea we talk about. It is something we enact. Because it is we, our embodied selves, who are enact it, the action becomes visible to others. Person as embodied spirit that human action is visible action because of bodies. Love is visible action through our bodies (hugging, giving a helping hand). Freedom as visible through the action of our bodies thus makes it difficult for the actor to simply escape facing the consequences of his actions. Someone who does not want to be held responsibility for his actions would do those actions in the dark. A criminal plans his crime well so as not to leave traces of himself as responsible for the crime. This act is act of cowardice. According to the existentialists like Kierkegaard and Sarte, cowardice is the opposite of freedom. Freedom can only be genuine when one takes responsibility for it. It is responsible when it is done socially, declared in broad daylight before witnesses. Freedom, Commitment and the Strengthening of Oneself • The ordinary eye may say, “sayang!” But the reflective philosophical mind, who understands the true meaning of freedom, now knows that something was lost in the process. In fact, an important thing was gained- oneself as a free and mature being.