MTB - MLE

125
113
99
87
79
74
64 62
54 56
50 48
31
21
4

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G1 G2 G3

Percentage

MTB – MLE 1ST QUARTER 28.54 30.09

ACHIEVEMENT RATE 8.17 17.37

15.82

DNME (60 -
FS (75 -
74%) S (80 - 84%)
79%) VS (85 -
89%) O (90 -
100%)
 SCIENCE
204

147
119
99 102 104
84
70
57 55 51
37
20 23 16
7 5 1 0 2

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G3 G4 G5 G6

44.89
SCIENCE 1ST QUARTER 30.09
ACHIEVEMENT RATE 1.08 18.87

DNME (60 - 5.07

74%) FS (75 - 79%)
S (80 - 84%)
VS (85 - 89%)
O (90 - 100%)
 EPP
118 118
108
99
89 90
79
71

51
42
35
20
1 0 2

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G4 65 G6

EPP 1ST QUARTER 22.97

32.18 33.04

ACHIEVEMENT RATE 0.33

11.48
DNME (60 -
74%) FS (75 - 79%)
S (80 - 84%)
VS (85 - 89%)
O (90 - 100%)
 MATHEMATICS
142
133
124 121
112 111
103
97 94 95 91
83
65 69
57 58 57 55
43 46 47

22
15 13 11 12 9
1 4 0

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

36.46
MATH QUARTER 1ST 32.65

ACHIEVEMENT RATE 5.24 17.88

7.78
DNME (60 -
74%) FS (75 - 79%)
S (80 - 84%)
VS (85 - 89%)
O (90 - 100%)
 ENGLISH
147 147
134
123 121
108
100
92
75
67
57 53 52 54
36 33 32
28
13 14 14
4 7 6 5

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

38.57
34.63
ENGLISH QUARTER 1ST
ACHIEVEMENT RATE 4.34 16.56

DNME (60 - 5.91

74%) FS (75 - 79%)
S (80 - 84%)
VS (85 - 89%)
O (90 - 100%)
 FILIPINO
196
166

105 103 101 95 93 102

75 74
64 62
46 52
39 42 35
23 20
10 7 6 5
0 1

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

FILIPINO 1ST QUARTER 27.66 30.62

29.43
ACHIEVEMENT RATE 1.84
10.45
DNME (60 -
74%) FS (75 - 79%)
S (80 - 84%)
VS (85 - 89%)
O (90 - 100%)
 MAPEH
185

139
131
124
109
100 101
93 93 91 88 93
84
74
59 54 54
43 47 51
30
15 9
8 6 8
0 0 0 1

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

MAPEH 1ST QUARTER 39.26

29.74
ACHIEVEMENT RATE 2.33
16.35

12.33
DNME (60 -
74%) FS (75 - 79%)
S (80 - 84%)
VS (85 - 89%)
O (90 - 100%)
 Edukasyon sa Pagkakatao (ESP)
137 132
129124
115

94 91 93 97 94
82 82
70 68 72 68
49 51
43 39
37 32
29 28
19
12
2 0 0 1

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

ESP 1ST QUARTER 35.03

28.52
ACHIEVEMENT RATE
17.35
3.07 16.03
DNME (60 -
74%) FS (75 - 79%)
S (80 - 84%)
VS (85 - 89%)
O (90 - 100%)
 Araling Panlipunan (AP)
148

119
104104 107 102
96 96 98 95
91
82 86 78 77
62 62
56
40 42
35 33
21 22
9 9 5 9
1 1

DNME (60-74%) FS (75 - 79%) S (80 - 84%) VS (85 - 89%) O (90 - 100%)
G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

AP 1ST QUARTER 29.63 32.06

ACHIEVEMENT RATE 4.29

23.23

10.79
DNME (60 -
74%) FS (75 - 79%)
S (80 - 84%)
VS (85 - 89%)
O (90 - 100%)
100.00%
98.00%
96.00%
94.00%
92.00%
90.00%
88.00%
86.00%

MTB-MLE SCI EPP MATH ENG FIL MAPEH ESP AP Q1 AVE

Percentage 91.83% 98.92% 99.67% 94.76% 95.66% 98.16% 97.67% 96.92% 95.61% 96.58%
 Subject Mean MPS
ENGLISH 21.31 53.92
MATH 20.4 54.51
SCIENCE 22.1 51.71
FILIPINO 25.6 61.23
EsP 26.5 70.60
MTB-MLE 22.5 67.77
AP 24.7 62.95
MAPEH 24.9 62.82
EPP 23.2 51.37
AVERAGE 23.46 59.65

Q1 TEST RESULTS SUGGESTS AN “AVERAGE”

MASTERY LEVEL AS ITS MPS FALLS WITHIN 35
65%.
READING PROFILE - ENGLISH
 180

147 147

129 132
121

52 54

36

14
4 7

G4 G5 G6

NR Frustration Instructional Independent

PHIL-IRI PRETEST – ENGLISH RESULT

READING PROFILE - FILIPINO
 158 156

126
122
112
105
95
91

62
52 52 54

7 6 5
0

G3 G4 G5 G6

NR Frustration Instructional Independent

PHIL-IRI PRETEST – FILIPINO RESULT

 8 8 8

5
4 4
3
2

K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 SPED

A TOTAL OF 42 LEARNERS WERE IDENTIFIED TO BE

AT RISK OF DROPPING OUT DUE TO TRUANCY,
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS AND CONFLICT WITHIN THE
FAMILY.
Key performance Issues/ CAUSES OF Policy, TA Needed Proposed Actions Time Remarks

Indicator (KPI) Situation HIGH/ LOW Programs/Service Frame

Affected/
PERFORMANCE
PPA

ACCESS
There was a - There were fewer MOOE - Close - Enhance teaching – June to
decrease of learners enrolled monitoring of learning process March
enrolment during
in the school enrolment - Improve classroom
this SY with 2222
coming from
enrolled learners environment
GENERAL than the previous adjacent
ENROLMENT SY with 2276 community/
registered barangays.
RATE learners. - Transfer of
residence
- Transfer to private
schools
From 2,222 June - Increasing number
enrolment on of transferred out
the current SY, learners.
1890 of the
learners
successfully
completed on
the 1st Quarter.
Key performance Issues/ CAUSES OF HIGH/ Policy, TA Needed Proposed Actions Time Remarks

Indicator (KPI) Situation LOW PERFORMANCE Programs/Service Frame

Affected/
PPA

QUALITY
Out of 1818 -Poor Academic - Assessment - - SLAC June- Ongoi
promoted Performance for Basic Reiteration - Attend Seminars & March ng
learners, only - Education on Trainings
32.9% of Adjustment/devel teaching
learners earned opmental period strategies
VS & -health concerns and time
Outstanding (malnourishment, Managem
learning diseases) ent
Achievement progress - decrease of
Rate teaching-learning
engagement
Result of Q1
MPS depicts that
only half of the
test items were
answered
correctly.
Key performance Issues/ CAUSES OF HIGH/ Policy, TA Needed Proposed Actions Time Remarks

Indicator (KPI) Situation LOW PERFORMANCE Programs/Service Frame

Affected/
PPA

QUALITY
70% of the learners - Advent of Gadgets - Assessment for - full time - Hire full time clerk June- Ongoi
belongs to - Book vs Pupil Basic Education clerk - Strengthened Linkages March ng
Frustration Level Ratio (LSB/NGOs)
based on Phil-IRI - Disruption of -
Assessment classes SLAC/SEMINARS/TRAININ
- Lack of Reading GS
Materials - provision of helpful media
(ex. TV) in teaching reading
in every classroom and of
supplementary reading
materials
Literacy Rate

56% of the learners

tested reached
instructional and
independent
reading profile in
both English and
Filipino.
 Remarks
Key performance Issues/ CAUSES OF HIGH/ Policy, TA Needed Proposed Actions Time
Indicator (KPI) Situation LOW PERFORMANCE Programs/Service Frame
Affected/
PPA

GOVERNANCE
Presence of Destruction of Teaching – Provision of - Strengthen linkages to June – Perime
domesticated school properties Learning perimeter LGU/ NGOs March ter
animals, Environment fencing - Outsourcing through Fencin
outsiders and School GPTA Initiatives g
unauthorized Regulations
vendors
Perimeter
Fencing
16 spans of Not enough to
perimeter fence cover the school
was put up from premises.
Buwan ng Wika
IGP.
AS INDICATED IN SIP SY 2019 – 2020
IMPLEMENTATION