Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Decision Making Matrix

    Încărcat de

    Nimesh Agarwal
    58 vizualizări17 pagini
    The document discusses various decision matrix tools that can be used to evaluate design concepts or solutions against criteria. It describes tools like QFD, decision matrices, FMEA, and the four blocker method. For each tool it covers fundamentals like relating solutions to criteria, scoring, and weighting. Best practices are outlined like using only critical criteria and differentiating scores. Pitfalls discussed include having too many criteria or identical scores between solutions. The key is to use these tools appropriately to aid decision making rather than as the final determinant.

    Descriere originală:

    tools for the decision matrix

    Titlu original

    Decision making matrix

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    PPT, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The document discusses various decision matrix tools that can be used to evaluate design concepts or solutions against criteria. It describes tools like QFD, decision matrices, FMEA, and the four blocker method. For each tool it covers fundamentals like relating solutions to criteria, scoring, and weighting. Best practices are outlined like using only critical criteria and differentiating scores. Pitfalls discussed include having too many criteria or identical scores between solutions. The key is to use these tools appropriately to aid decision making rather than as the final determinant.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PPT, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    58 vizualizări17 pagini

    Decision Making Matrix

    Încărcat de

    Nimesh Agarwal
    The document discusses various decision matrix tools that can be used to evaluate design concepts or solutions against criteria. It describes tools like QFD, decision matrices, FMEA, and the four blocker method. For each tool it covers fundamentals like relating solutions to criteria, scoring, and weighting. Best practices are outlined like using only critical criteria and differentiating scores. Pitfalls discussed include having too many criteria or identical scores between solutions. The key is to use these tools appropriately to aid decision making rather than as the final determinant.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PPT, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 17

    Decision Making

    • Decision Framework
    • Context
    • Criticality
    • Concurrent Environment
    • Variation
    • Decision Matrix
    • General discussion
    • Pugh Matrix
    • Scoring
    • FMEA
    • Four Blocker
    • Best Practices and Pitfalls
    Matrix example
    Decision Matrix Tools

    • Types of Matrix Tools


    •QFD- Formative tool, positive
    •Decision Matrix- selection
    •FMEA- Assessment, negative
    •Four Blocker- Quick selection
    •Tool Fundamentals
    •Relate solutions to criteria
    •Scoring
    •Weighting
    • Best Practices and Pitfalls
    QFD a structured way to identify
    best means to meet customer CTQ’s
    or requirements

    QFD Simplified Form

    QFD Example
    Helps Make Selection
    Pugh Matrix Example- Selection and Concept Improvement
    Examples from Last Year
    This
    This FormForm
    FMEA Includes Most of Complete.
    is Relatively the Features
    YouofWill
    a FMEA, You
    be Using
    will be using a simplified FMEA Form
    a Simplified
    FMEA Example
    Four Blocker Screening- easy and quick initial screening tool
    Example- Help a one arm man lift a heavy box

    10
    Special lift strap

    Good Bet Possible


    Chance of Working

    5
    Bionic Arm

    Possible Unlikely

    1
    Easy Hard
    Ease of Implementation
    Pitfalls:
    • Long “laundry” list of criteria
    • Two or more candidates with nearly identical scores
    • Putting too much trust in the tool
    • Self serving, ie, make the matrix support your bias
    • The Tool becomes the end not the means

    Best Practices:
    • Use only critical/ important criteria(some criteria like safety can be Go/No Go)
    • 9,3,1 or Pugh +- scoring; make sure you differentiate
    • Reevaluate scores, weightings and potential design improvements
    • Keep it simple; do what is needed for the decision but no more

    Make the Tools Work for You

    S-ar putea să vă placă și