Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
AGC GROUP
Internal Use
Theme Selection CS
AGC GROUP
12,870
Japan has problem stain glass
CHINA
10% since 2010 and has not been
73,715
ASEAN MARKET solved.
59% 25,515
20% EUROPE
Internal Use
Schedule Activity CS
AGC GROUP
Innovation
Internal Use
Collecting Data CS
AGC GROUP
• First encounter : Stain Glass of NR931M-FHGX
Date : 29 June 2010 Glass
Problem : NR931M-FHGX ( sample sent from Autoglass )
Prod date : March 2010
Claim : Dry glass looks clean
Water poured on the glass and cleaned -----> Mark visible in glass
Fact :
Packing Material : - Plastic wrapping thickness 0.06 mm
- Plastic cover with hole
- Desiccant 2 pcs (200 gr)
Internal Use
Record Data Analysis CS
AGC GROUP
Evaluation Result of Part Center
Internal Use
Organize Team and CS
AGC GROUP
Allocate Man Power
CUSTOMER
Synergic coordination
between Sales, QA,
Production and Logistic.
LOGISTIC SALES QA
Mr. Sales acted as:
Mauliater Ms. Denny Mr. Haryoto
•Initiator
•Coordinator
•Manage trial to customer
PRODUCTION •Give feedback to customer
Mr. Mujiyo
and internal Asahimas
Internal Use
Observe Problem CS
AGC GROUP
1. Internal Observation
Level Stain (SL) Level Eraserable (EL)
Conclusion:
4 Many 4 Can not After we keep the glass in 2
3 Moderate 3 Difficult months, in a one week the
2 Little 2 Easy stain beginning to arise even it
1 No 1 No need easy to wipe off. SL-EL = 4-2
1 1 2
2 2 2
3 3 2
4 3 2
5 4 2
6 4 2
Internal Use
CS
AGC GROUP
2. External Observation
1 4 3
2 4 4
Conclusion: There are stain glass on AMG The receiving goods there is stain on it.
product and difficult to be wiped off which There are many stain and difficult to wipe
received by Autoglass Japan. SL-EL = 4-3 off.
Internal Use
Seek Cause of Problem CS
using WWA
AGC GROUP
Internal Use
Verification CS
2 No air circulation in At the drying room Yes 1. Add exhaust fan OK (Stain
drying room there was no air 2. Add upper blower and air reduce)
circulation system curtain
3 Washing process The washing process Yes Turned off washing water and NG (stain
using high using high heater blower reduce but
temperature water temperature can’t be
(40⁰-50⁰C) implemented)
4 For non-MB model Send sample for Yes All Japan model either MB or OK (stain
there is no spacer non-MB using non-MB using spacer reduce)
spacer Internal Use
Comparison of AMG Plastic CS
and AATH Plastic
AGC GROUP
AMG plastic has many stain come
An AATH article has few wrinkles of
from wrinkles which transferring
vinyl and there is little stain of glass.
the pattern on glass.
Internal Use
CS
AGC GROUP
Action 1 Action 2
Conclusion:
Conclusion:
1. NTG Plastic is better than AMG Plastic . It
1. Petlin Plastic is better than AMG Plastic .
shown a little stain on the glass and possible
2. Price higher 30% than AMG plastic.
to wipe off lightly
3. SL-EL = 2-2
2. SL-EL = 2-2.
Internal Use
Action 3 CS
AGC GROUP
AGC GROUP
Conclusion:
1. The result of this
trial shows that
even though
already use LDPE
vinyl, the stain still
occurs.
The condition before open the plastic The condition before open the plastic
2. SL-EL = 4-3
Internal Use
Action 5 CS
AGC GROUP
AGC GROUP
Internal Use
Stain Glass Simulation CS
Conclusion:
1. Temperature affected the stain glass.
2. Pressure affected the stain glass.
Internal Use
Decrease CS
Internal Use
Measurement Result CS
AGC GROUP
AGC GROUP
Result Picture
OK
Internal Use
Prevent Pressure on CS
AGC GROUP
Glass Surface
No Spacer With Spacer
Internal Use
CS
Result Picture
AGC GROUP
Internal Use
Last Conclusion CS
AGC GROUP
Internal Use
Comparison between AMG, AATH, CS
AGC GROUP
and LSH Supply
N Specification AMG AATH LSH
o
1 Lead time 3 weeks 10 days 4 days
2 Spacer for non Yes Yes Yes
MB model
3 Silica gel Yes Yes No information
4 Plastic material LDPE HDPE No information
5 Wrapping Same Same Same
condition
6 Stain glass Much stain glass shown a little stain shown a little stain
and difficult to on the glass and on the glass and
remove by wiping easy to remove by easy to remove by
off. wiping off . wiping off .
Internal Use
Material Comparison CS
AGC GROUP
No HDPE LDPE
1 Density 0.94 – 0.97 grm/cm3. Density 0,88 – 0,91 grm/cm3.
2 Melting point 130⁰ C. Melting point 110⁰ C.
3 Rigidity/stiffness/strain has proven Pull force/Strain is more flexible than
quite good but prone to scratch HDPE
4 Non scratch resistant Scratch resistant
5 Has small pores than LDPE so it Its pore is bigger than HDPE
hasn’t enough room for air
circulation
Internal Use
CS
Price Comparison
AGC GROUP
Internal Use
Standarisasi CS
AGC GROUP
Internal Use
Next Action CS
AGC GROUP
Internal Use
CS
AGC GROUP
Internal Use