Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ELECTRONIC
RECRUITING
A Trip Down Memory Lane
Long-time HR specialists still remember (not without
regret) receiving stacks of resumes sent by
employment agencies or one of the other more
traditional recruitment sources described in the
previous chapter.
The process of receiving and reviewing resumes and
employment applications has changed dramatically in
the last two decades especially with the advent of the
World Wide Web in 1989. Increasingly, employers
are using the internet to recruit, either by developing
an online presence of their own or by linking up with
web-based job search services.
Electronic resumes made their appearance for the
first time in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
The Internet as a Recruitment Tool (cont’d)
Definition of an Applicant
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC) has proposed guidelines to define when a
person who applies for a job over the internet is
considered an “applicant.”
This is important since employers are required to keep
records for applicants on the basis of race, gender, or
ethnicity, to preclude charges of discrimination.
The proposed guidelines stipulate that “the core of being
an applicant is asking to be hired to do a particular job
for a specific employer.”
Definition of an Applicant (cont’d)
According to the EEOC, three conditions must be met
for an individual to be considered an electronic
applicant:
1. An employer must take steps to fill a given job
opening.
2. An individual must follow the employer’s
standard application procedure.
3. The individual must express interest in the
opening; casual browsers are not considered
applicants.
Definition of an Applicant (cont’d)
Following are some examples of instances whereby
individuals would not be considered applicants:
Transmitting a resume to the “jobs” e-mail address
on a company’s website, without indicating
interest in a specific job.
Posting a resume on any major job board.
Having a resume “passed on” by one company to
another company, without first ascertaining the
applicant’s interest in a particular job.
These proposed guidelines apply exclusively to the
internet and related technologies. The EEOC is
reviewing the above guidelines and a final version is
still awaited.
Electronic Resumes (cont’d)
Proponents of the electronic format offer the following
reasons for discouraging paper resumes:
Paper costs much more than the average electronic
file of six kilobytes.
Processing paper into an electronic format takes
longer than processing an originally electronic file.
Mail delivery, especially snail mail, is much slower
than electronic mail.
Electronic files can be formatted, extracted,
and otherwise manipulated countless
ways; they can also be incorporated with
other data or stored in various applications
or systems.
They take up less storage space and
cause no “pollution.”
Electronic Resumes (cont’d)
Paper resume supporters offer the following
arguments against electronic resumes:
They are often difficult to read.
They lack a professional look.
They lack privacy and confidentiality.
They may get lost in a mile-high cyber pile. (see
cartoon next)