 Name: Charles Roberts

 Age: 25 yrs.
 Ethnicity: African
 Marital Status: Single
 Education: High School
 Address: Arouca
 Dates Evaluated: July 22nd, 24th, 2016
 Examiner: Dianne Charles-
Greaves
 Mother – Concerned about odd
behavior (e.g. walking barefoot on EMR)
 Strange religious philosophies
 Not working (don’t last long on jobs)
 Seemingly brilliant, have great ideas but
not able to follow through. Dropped out
of university
 Sometimes aggressive behavior
 Draws strange symbols in his room
 MINI-MENTAL STATUS
EXAMINATION (MMSE)
 MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR
(MBTI)
 HOUSE-TREE-PERSON (HTP)
 MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC
PERSONALITY INVENTORY-2RF
(MMPI-2RF)
 Charles took approximately three and a
half hours to complete the tests.
 Appearance - Casual dress, not well
groomed. Did not
maintain eye contact
and hands sweated
 Gait - Normal
 Speech - Well modulated,
excellent vocabulary
skills
 Affect/Mood - Calm but a bit subdued
 Attitude - Co-operative
 MMSE Score - 29/30
 Normal cognitive functions
 Test revealed Unique Personality Type:
ENFP
 The two middle letters of Charles’ Myers-
Briggs personality type showed the two
mental processes that make his type
unique:
› N (Intuition) and F (Feeling) meaning:
 Devote most of his energy to Intuition
and support Intuition with Feeling
 Most Popular Occupations for ENFPs
1. Craft artist
2. Actor/performing artist /dancer
3. Photographer
4. Musician, singer, music director, composer
5. Clinical/counseling/educational
psychologist
6. Mental health counselor
oVery small house, small
door - implies insecurity,
withdrawal, discontent,
and regression.
oTree drawn small could
mean that he feels
pressured by his
environment
 Persondrawn was of the opposite sex,
“cartoon figure,” profile of the face
with emphasis on outline of eyes. Also
had a very large head, which could
signify regression.
Scale Raw Percentile Comments
Score Range
SRC 5 <84 Normal
AH 5 <84 Normal
WGA 4 84-94 Withdrawal and
guarded
accessibility.
Social or
emotional
detachment
ADST 1 <84 Normal
PROTOCOL VALIDITY
 CNS = 0 F-f = 51 Fs = 34
 VRIN-r = 35 FBS = 45
 TRIN-r = 55 L-r = 52 K-r = 56
 NO EVIDENCE OF OVER OR UNDER
REPORTING
 The protocol is therefore interpretable
Somatic/Cognitive Complaint Scales:
 Cognitive Complaints (COG)
 COG = 72
 He reports problems with his attention,
memory, and concentration.
 He has unusual thoughts, and problems
focusing his mind on any one thing
Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales:
 Emotional Dysfunction
 RCd = 65
 Moods:
 He reports that he is discouraged and
generally demoralized with himself and his
life.
 Cognitions:
 He expects to fail or believes he has failed
in various areas of his life
Behavioral/Dysfunction and Interpersonal
Functioning:
 BXD = 71
• Significant externalizing, acting out
behaviour
Family Problems(FML)
 FML = 79
• Conflictual family relationships and
lack of support from family members
 Information from Charles’ clinical interview
and also from his mother, indicates that
although he seems quite intelligent, he has
emotional and behavioral issues. Results
from the various tests done has identified
some psychopathological indicators of
Antisocial Personality Disorder according to
the DSM-V. This is characterized by a
pervasive pattern of disregard for the rights
of other people that often manifests as
hostility and/or aggression.
› Further evaluation for disorders associated
with thought dysfunction
› May require impatient treatment for thought
dysfunction
› Anger Management
› Family counseling therapy
 Learnt to conduct and score some
psychological tests
 Desire to know more about these tests
 Conduct a clinical interview
 Honed my observational skills
 Take nothing at face value