HELLO GUYS!

POINT OF DISCUSION
1. INTRODUCTION 3. RESULT

General about LGBT Result from some methods that

use in this researh
2. METHODS
4. CONCLUSION
Some way to get the information
about this research Discuss the results obtained from
some methods that use.
2

More Information , you can look this journal,

Ryan, Caitin, dkk. 2010. Family Acceptance in Adolescence and the Health
of LGBT Young Adults. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing,
Volume 23, Number 4, pp. 205–213
1. INTRODUCTION
Let’s start with the first set
of slides
What do
you think 4

about LGBT?
PURPOSE

▹ In this research, the author wants to

study some of the reactions / responses
of families who accept or reject LGBT
6
2. METHODS
 “
METHODS THAT USE IN THIS
RESEARCH :
▹ Family Acceptance
▹ Demographic Measures
▹ Young Adult Adjustment and
Health

8
Family acceptance
The measure of family acceptance
was developed based on individual
in-depth interviews of 2–4 hr each
with 53 socioeconomically diverse
Latino and non-Latino white self-
identified LGBT adolescents and
their families in urban. 9
 Some question that use in
this methods
▹ How often did any of your
parents/caregivers talk
openly about your sexual
orientation?
▹ How often were your
openly LGBT friends
invited to join family
activities?
From these transcripts, a list
of 55 positive family.
▹ How often did any of your
parents/caregivers bring you
to an LGBT youth
organization or event?
▹ How often did any of your
10
parents/caregivers
appreciate your clothing or
hairstyle, even though it
might not have been typical
for your gender?
 Demographic Measures
▹ Immigrant status
Point:
1 = born outside the
United States,
0 = born in the United
States).
.
▹ childhood family
religiosity (How
religious or spiritual
was your family while
you were growing up?
Ponit:
0 = not at all
3 = extremely).
▹ Parents’ occupational status
was measured by coding
written responses for the
primary occupation of each
parent or caregiver
Point:
1 = unskilled manual labor
2= semiskilledlabor
11
3= skilledlabor
4= professional
▹ childhood religious
affiliation
Point:
1 = any religious affiliation
0 = no religious affiliation
Young Adult
Adjustment and
Health
▹ We report on two
indicators of positive
adjustment and health
and three negative 12
indicators
Three negative indicators:
Two indicators of positive adjustment:

“ . . . haveSocial
you hadsupport
problemswas based onSexual
the behavior General
risk washealth is assessed
Suicidal thoughts
with one or
with the average
law because
of 12 of
items,
yourincluding:defined as reporting
item:any behaviors were
alcohol or“There
drug use?” unprotected analor vaginal measured as follows:
is a special person who is “How is your health in general?”
“ . . . havearound
you lost when am in need,” intercourse within the past
a jobI because “During the past six
6 months with a Points
casual months did you have any
of your alcohol or drug use?” help and
“I get the emotional partner or a steady partner thoughts of ending your
1 = poor
“ . . . havesupport
you passedI need
outfrom
or lost
my family,”
who was nonmonogamous life?”
5 = excellent 13
consciousness because of your
“My friends really try to helporme” serodiscordant for HIV “Have you ever, at any
alcohol or drug use?”
Points Point: point in your life,
“ . . . have you had conflicts attempted to take your
1 = strongly disagree 0 = no
with family, lovers, or friends own life?”
because of your alcohol
5 = strongly agree or drug 1 = yes
Point:
use?”
0 = no
Point:
0 = no 1 = yes

1 = somewhat yes/yes
3. RESULT
RESULT
1. Those born in the United States reported higher family
acceptance compared with immigrants.
2. Participants who reported a childhood religious affiliation
reported lower family acceptance compared with those with no
religious affiliation in childhood.
3. Highly accepting families reported low religiosity compared
with the high religiosity among low accepting families. 15
4. Highly accepting families had higher parental occupational
status compared with those that scored low on acceptance.
Young adults who reported high levels of family acceptance
scored higher on all three measures of positive adjustment and
health: self-esteem, social support, and general health. For the
measures of negative health outcomes, young adults who
reported low levels of family acceptance had scores that were
significantly worse for depression, substance abuse, and suicidal
ideation and attempts
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of research that has
been done, it is found that there are still
many families who do not accept the
existence of LGBT with the criteria of
immigrants, religion, and low economic
status. However, the authors of this study
focus on families that support the
16
existence of LGBT
Since LGBT is a hidden existences, there
is an obstacle in conducting this
research. Mapped 100 miles from the
office to certain centers such as bars,
clubs, and organization. This research
focus on LGBT non-Latino white and
Latino young adults, the two largest
ethnic groups in California
The relationship between LGBT people and
families who refuse will affect their
health and sexual risks. For families who
accept the existence of LGBT will focus on
positive things like (selfesteem, social
support, and general health) and protect
them from negative things like
depression, substance abuse, and suicidal
ideation and attempts). 17

Control from the family is very necessary,

when there is rejection in a group of LGBT
existence, the potential for suicide is
huge. To minimize the existence of mental
and health disorders in LGBT, author
provide several approaches to prevent
these things.
Implications for Nursing Practice and Research,
Parent/Family Education, and Support for Youth and Family
Parents who already know that children already have a personality that leads to
LGBT can bring them to Nursing Practice and Research, so we can discuss with
our children. Dont forget to support your children in any condition.

18
THANKS!
Any questions? 19