Sunteți pe pagina 1din 12

Cause Validation:- (Effect of curing process for poggie mixer and barrel mixer)

Two-sample T for Poggie vs Barrel

N Mean StDev SE Mean


POggie 10 62.0 15.1 4.8
Barrel 10 60.6 11.7 3.7

Difference = μ (POggie) - μ (Barrel)


Estimate for difference: 1.40
95% CI for difference: (-11.40, 14.20)
T-Test of difference = 0 (vs ≠): T-Value
= 0.23 P-Value = 0.820 DF = 16
I-MR Chart of weight-oct'18
UCL=21811.4
21800
Individual Value

21750 _
X=21736.6

21700

LCL=21661.7
21650
1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81
Observation

UCL=92.0
80
Moving Range

60

40 __
MR=28.1
20

0 LCL=0
1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81
Observation
I-MR Chart of weight-Aug
21850
UCL=21827.2

21800
Individual Value

_
21750 X=21750.8

21700
LCL=21674.3
1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73
Observation

UCL=93.9
80
Moving Range

60

40 __
MR=28.7
20

0 LCL=0
1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73
Observation
I-MR Chart of weight - Nov18
UCL=21813.3
21800
Individual Value

_
21750
X=21743.3

21700

LCL=21673.2
1 14 27 40 53 66 79 92 105 118 131
Observation

UCL=86.05
80
Moving Range

60

40
__
MR=26.34
20

0 LCL=0
1 14 27 40 53 66 79 92 105 118 131
Observation
I-MR Chart of weight-sep
UCL=21747.91
21740
Individual Value

21720 _
X=21711.14
21700

21680
LCL=21674.38
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34
Observation

UCL=45.17
40
Moving Range

30

20
__
MR=13.82
10

0 LCL=0
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34
Observation
Scatterplot of YM vs Weight
45.5

45.0

44.5

44.0
YM

43.5

43.0

42.5

42.0

22230 22240 22250 22260 22270 22280 22290 22300


Weight
Weight variation of poggie and barrel after curing

N Mean StDev SE Mean


weightvarpog 10 180.1 12.8 4.0
weightvarbar 10 175.9 11.0 3.5

Difference = μ (weightvarpog) - μ
(weightvarbar)
Estimate for difference: 4.20
95% CI for difference: (-7.06, 15.46)
T-Test of difference = 0 (vs ≠): T-Value =
0.79 P-Value = 0.442 DF = 17
I-MR Chart of weight-var in curing process
210 UCL=208.10

195

Individual Value
_
180 X=178

165

150 LCL=147.90
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Observation

40
UCL=36.97

30

Moving Range
20
__
10 MR=11.32

0 LCL=0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Observation
Hypothesis testing – Lumps generation in poggie mixer and barrel mixer
Two-Sample T-Test and CI:
lumps-barrel, lumps-poggie
Two-sample T for lumps-bar vs lumps-pog

N Mean StDev SE Mean


lumps-bar 20 0.7975 0.0618 0.014
lumps-pog 20 1.197 0.102 0.023

Difference = μ (lumps-bar) - μ (lumps-


pog)
Estimate for difference: -0.3990
95% CI for difference: (-0.4535, -
0.3445)
T-Test of difference = 0 (vs ≠): T-Value
= -14.93 P-Value = 0.000 DF = 31
I-MR Chart of wgtvaroven
210 UCL=208.10

195
Individual Value

_
180 X=178

165

150 LCL=147.90
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Observation

40
UCL=36.97

30
Moving Range

20
__
10 MR=11.32

0 LCL=0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Observation

S-ar putea să vă placă și