Akibat Buruk

Jika Anak Tidak

di Vaksinasi

Kelompok 3a

Arimbi Erikha Putri

Citra Rosiva
Eva Raini
Pebby Pebrian
Evidence Based Practice
1. Focused question
 Apa akibat buruknya jika anak tidak di
vaksinansi
2. Published Evidence
 “Pilot comparative study on the helth of
vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-
old U.S. children”
 “Tuberculousus meningitis in BCG vaccinated
and unvaccinated children”
Standar Kualitas Jurnal
Efek Buruk Jika Anak Tidak divaksinasi

1. Penulis
a. Nama : Anthony R Mawson1, Brian
D Ray2, Azad R Bhuiyan3,
and Binu Jacob4
b. Pendidikan :-
c. Profesi : 1Profesor
2President

3Associate Professor

4Former graduate student

d. Institusi :1Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics, School of Public Health,
Jackson State University, Jackson, MS
39213, USA.
2National Home Education Research

Institute, PO Box13939, Salem, OR 97309,

USA.
3Department of Epidemiology and

Biostatistics, School of Public Health,

Jackson State University, Jackson, MS
39213, USA.
4Department of Epidemiology and

Biostatistics School of Public

Health, Jackson State University, Jackson,
MS 39213, USA.
 2. Keterangan pendukung
a. Referensi : 71 Jurnal penelitian terbitan 1993-2016
b. tanggal update : 24 April 2017

3. Tingkat kebenaran
Tidak ada karena peneliti tidak mencantumkan penelitian
sebelumnya
4. Transparansi penanggung jawab isi
 Correspondence: Anthony R Mawson, Professor,
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of
Public Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS
39213, USA.
E-mail: Anthony.r.mawson@jsums.edu

5. Transparansi sponsor
 This study was supported by grants from Generation
Rescue, Inc., and the Children’s Medical Safety
Research Institute, charitable organizations that support
research on children’s health and safety.
6. Kebijakan iklan dan editorial :
• Tidak ada iklan perusahaan farmasi atau iklan
lainnya

7. Unsur pelengkap :
• Ada lampiran data pendukung statistik

8. Kerahasiaan :
• Anonimitas sampel terjaga
Grading Evidence
 Termasuk dalam kategori 3 Studi non-analitik
seperti laporan kasus, laporan serial

 Peneliti mengambil data dengan meminta ibu

untuk mengisi quisoner melalui website yang
disediakan oleh perusahaan qualtrick
( http://qualtrics.com )
Critical appraisal Jurnal
Apa Akibat Buruknya Jika Anak Tidak
divaksinasi
 Is the study question relevant?
- Relevan

 Does the study add anything new?

- Tidak ada

 What type of research question being asked?

- Apa akibat buruknya jika anak tidak divaksinasi
 Wasthe study design appropriate for the research
question?
- Menggunakan study design cross-
sectional

 Didthe study methods address the most important

potential source of bias?
- Ya
 Was the study performed according to original protocol?
- Penelitian berjalan sesuai dengan rancangan penelitian
tanpa kesulitan berarti

 Does the study stated a hypothesis

- Ada

 Was the statistical analyses performed correctly?

- Analisis statistik menggunakan teknik sesuai
 Do the data justify the conclusions?
- Hasil penelitian membuktikan hipotesis,
yaitu adanya efek buruk jika anak tidak di
vaksin

 Are there any conflict of interest?

- Tidak ada
 Key Points Appraising Cross
Sectional Analysis
 Was the study sample clearly defined?
jelas

 Was a representative sample achieved (e.g. was the

response rate sufficiently high)?
Tidak

 Were all relevant exposures, potential confounding

factors and outcomes measured accurately?
Tidak

 Were patients with a wide range of severity of disease

assessed?
Tidak
Decision
Dari jurnal tersebut, dapat disimpulkan :
Anak yang diberikan vaksin memilik resiko
terkena penyakit lebih besar dibandingkan
dengan anak yang tidak di vaksinasi pada
penyakit akut dan penyakit kronik
TERIMAKASIH