Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
02 Methodology
Thermodynamic analysis of sub/super-critical ORC system.
04 Conclusions
Introduction
Background
Increasing the electricity
demand.
Supercrtical Organic Rankine
Cycle (ORC) is a potential
Medium and low enthalpy technology
energy resources are abundant
Propane is a potential working
fluid for supercritical ORC, good
Energy conversion technology is thermal performance and
limited environmental friendliness
Aim of the
To investigate thermodynamic
research
performance especially the net
specific isentropic work and yhe
isentropic thermal efficiency of
SORC system. The thermodynamic
performance is also compare with
propylene (R-1270), R-134a and R-
227ea as working fluid.
Methodology
Thermodynamic Calculation
and Analysis
Using Excel spreedsheet and
REFPROP 9,1 Database.
Fluid Selection
Propane (R-290), Propylene (R-
1270), R-134a, and R-227ea.
D D
D D D
Fluid Selection
Thermodynamic Cycles
4
Turbine/
Heatin g flu id , in
Expander W
Evaporator 5
Recuperator
Heating fluid , out 2
1 6
3
Condenser
Feed pump Cooling fluid , out
Schematic diagram of simple Cooling fluid , in
sub/super-critical ORC system
Schematic diagram of sub/super-
critical ORC system with
recuperator
Net specific isentropic work of ORC and SORC Comparison of the net specific isentropic
systems with propane as working fluid for various work of ORC system for different working fluid
evaporation pressure and turbine inlet
temperature
Isentropic Thermal Efficiency
Efficiency of the ORC and SORC system with Comparison of the thermal efficiency of ORC
R-290 as working fluid for various evaporation system for different working fluid
pressure and turbine inlet temperature
Improving Isentropic Thermal Efficiency
Efficiency of the ORC and SORC system with Increased efficiency of the ORC and SORC
recuperator and propane as working fluid system with a recuperator
Results
Evaporator Pressure
Organic fluid name TT,in, o C Tcond, o C 0,75*Pcrit Pcrit 1,25*Pcrit
wnet,s (kJ/kg) hs h s,recuperator wnet,s (kJ/kg) hs h s,recuperator wnet,s (kJ/kg) hs h s,recuperator
Hydrocarbon
Propylene/R-1270 150 37,86124 49,51395963 9,82% 13,84% 61,86892028 12,85% 16,72% 67,61074199 14,81% 17,99%
Propane/R-290 150 37,76252 54,77548971 10,50% 14,95% 66,17671684 13,28% 17,51% 71,14795473 15,08% 18,59%
Hydroflourocarbon
R-134a 150 37,87943 30,72599297 11,65% 15,68% 35,25444547 13,96% 17,58% 37,00117204 15,42% 18,30%
R-227ea 150 37,74945 19,91083762 9,98% 16,07% 23,10419502 11,98% 18,18% 24,72139807 13,33% 19,21%
This paper present thermodynamic
analysis of both subcritical and
supercritical ORC system with four organic
working fluids with almost the same critical
Conclusions
temperature. From the analysis that has
been done, here are some conclusions
that can be drawn:
Generally the supercritical ORC system
provides better both net specific isentropic
work and thermal efficiency than the
subcritical ORC system
For heat sources with low temperatures,
less than 150 oC, the SORC system with
propane as working fluid deliver better net
specific isentropic work and thermal
efficiency than the ORC system that using
propylene, R-134a, and R-227ea as
working fluids