Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Can, may, must, will, shall mood Peter will buy a new car.
Etc.
Mood is grammatical category associated with the cemantic dimention of modality. Mood are
categories of grammatical form, and modality are the associated categories of meaning.
Example:
Non modal Modal
She saw him. she must have seen him.
He leaves today. He must leave today.
Modality can be expressed by a great variety of formal means.
Example:
1. Could also be expressed by means of an adverb (perhaps she saw him).
2. An adjective (it’s possible that she saw him).
3. A noun (there’s a possibility that she saw him).
but for english at least the term mood is restricted to grammatical system associated with the
verb.
Uses of modal auxiliaries
There are three main families of meaning that the modal auxiliaries express:
Epistemic, Deontic, Dynamic.
1. Epistemic modality expresses meaning relating primarily to what is necessary
(must, be bound to, have to) or possible (may, might, could) given what we
know or believe.
Example:
She may be sick.
He must have overslept.
2. Deontic the meanings have to do with obligation (must, shall, have to, have
got to, gotta) or permission (can, may) of various kinds.
Examole:
He must apologize
May I come in?
3. Dynamic: some of the modals have uses concerned with
properties or dispositions of persons or other entities involved in the
situation.
Example:
She can speak five languages.
I’ve asked him to help us but he won’t.
I daren’t tell you anymore.
REALISATIONS OF MODAL MEANINGS
1. Modal certainty : will, must, be bound to
Will and must are the core modals that most strongly express modal certainty.
Example:
The concert will be over now.
The concert must be over.
2. Volition: willingness and intention will, shall
Willingness
Willingness is expressed in speech time, while the action predicted by the main verb or refers to a future event. Unwillingness is
expressed by will not, more usually contracted to won’t.
Example:
will you give a donation to the wildlife society?
yes, i will. Or i’m sorry, i won’t.
Interrogative shall is used in the 1st person to consult the addressees whises or to ask for device.
Example:
shall i carry those bags for you?
shall we go home now?
intention
When a speaker expresses an intention, the intention naturally coincides with speech time, but the intended action is in the future.
Example:
We will pick you up outside your house at 9.
I shall/ I will be back in a minute.
3. Logical necessity: must, be bound to (BrE), have to (AmE)
Logical necessity, meaning it is necessarily the case that the assertion is true. Must in general is far more
frequent in BrE than in AmE, but the logical meaning of Must in AmE is more common than in obligation
meaning. For both meaning AmE prefers to lexical verb have to.
Example:
The key must be in your pocket. (BrE and AmE)
The key has to be in your pocket. (AmE and with younger speakers of BrE)
The key is bount to be in your pocket. (BrE)
4. Probability or reasonable inference: should, ought
A more flexibel degree of prediction is expressed by should and the less common ought.
Example:
it should be easy to reach New York from here. (it is probably easy)
we should have enough money.
5. possibility: may, might, could
Epistemic possibility of an event occurring or being true.
Example:
this may be a dinosaur’s footprint.
this might be a dinosaur’s footprint.
this could be a dinosaur’s footprint.
MODAL OBLIGATION
1. Inescapable obligation and necessity: must, have to, have got to, gotta, shall
Deontic obligation and necessity can be throught of as an inescapable duty or requirement.
Must as a modal of obligation
Example: you must try harder.
we must do better than this.
shall, have to, have got to, gotta as modals of obligation
Of all modals of obligation, Shall is the most imperious, direct, and subjective. Of the lexical modals, have
to is objective (the obligation is external) and have got to subjective (the obligation is internal). Both
have to and got to have a past form had (got) to. Only have to can combine with modal auxiliaries
(may have got to/may have to).
Example: i may have to go Washington for a few days. (obligation external)
i may have got to go to Washington for a few days. (obligation internal)
2. Non binding obligation: should, ought
Should and ought express a less strong obligation, which is not binding and may be unfulfilled.
Example: people should drive more carefully.
you really ought to cut down on smoking.
3. Negation of the modal must and may
you must go home now You needn’t go now = you are not obliged to go
You must go now You don’t have to go now = you are not obliged to go
You must not go = you are obliged not to go
You may go now You may not/can’t go = you have not permission to
You may/can not go go
= you have permission not to
go
3. Negation of the modal must and may