Conference of Power

Ministers of
States/UTs

26th- 27th Feb 2019

Distribution Sector
1
 Analysis of Present Financial Performance

Status of DISCOMs Borrowing status

Content Reasons for Poor Financial

Flow Position

Addressing Metering,
Billing and Collection
Technology Related woes through Smart
Metering
Reforms Reducing theft (Ariel
Bunch Cabling)

2
Analysis of Present
Status of DISCOMs
Financial Performance
Achievements in key performance parameters (1/2)
Profit / (Loss) (Rs. ACS-ARR Gap AT&C losses
Timeline Energy Billed (MUs)
Cr.) (Rs./kWh) (%)

FY16 (51,480) 0.59 20.7% 6,94,235

10.6%
Annual
FY17 (37,877) 0.41 20.2% 7,68,213
Performance
7.3%
FY18 (15,049) 0.17 18.7% 8,23,922

H1 FY17 (18,689) 0.46 23.6% 3,60,574

7.8%
Half yearly
H1FY18 (11,071) 0.26 21.4% 3,88,752
Performance
7.6%
H1FY19 (15,080) 0.33 20.9% 4,18,383

Note: 24 states have submitted AT&C losses and 25 states have submitted ACS-ARR GAP and profit/loss figures till H1FY19.
5
Achievements in key performance parameters (2/2)
Billing Efficiency Collection Efficiency Power purchase cost
Timeline
(%) (%) (Rs./kWh)

FY16 81.6% 97.1% 4.19

Annual
FY17 82.9% 96.2% 4.23
Performance

FY18 83.9% 96.9% 4.20

H1 FY17 82.5% 92.6% 4.17

Half yearly
H1FY18 83.4% 94.2% 4.13
Performance

H1FY19 84.5% 93.6% 4.30

Note: 24 states have submitted AT&C losses and 25 states have submitted ACS-ARR GAP and profit/loss figures till H1FY19
6
AT&C Losses (%)
AT&C losses (%)
State
FY16 Change FY17 Change FY18 H1FY18 Change H1FY19
Jammu & Kashmir 61.6% 61.3% 53.8% 55.1% 52.8%
Meghalaya 36.5% 34.9% 34.6% 32.5% NA
Bihar 43.7% 39.0% 33.2% 40.3% 39.0%
Jharkhand 34.7% 31.8% 31.8% 39.3% 36.1%
Madhya Pradesh 24.0% 26.5% 29.7% 32.4% NA
Uttar Pradesh 26.5% 30.2% 27.7% 33.5% 33.1%
Manipur 44.2% 36.9% 24.6% 31.3% 45.7%
Haryana 29.8% 25.4% 20.3% 26.1% 23.1%
Rajasthan 30.4% 26.0% 19.7% 25.9% 26.0%
Puducherry 19.9% 19.0% 19.6% 22.6% 18.4%
Chhattisgarh 21.8% 19.3% 18.8% 21.6% 29.9%
Punjab 15.9% 14.5% 18.2% 32.6% 29.7%
Maharashtra 19.1% 18.9% 17.4% 18.7% 14.8%
Goa 17.1% 16.8% 16.1% 18.6% 36.2%
Assam 25.5% 23.8% 15.7% 22.0% 21.2%
Uttarakhand 17.19% 14.02% 15.7% 32.2% 27.8%
Tripura 20.9% 16.6% 15.5% 21.4% 19.3%
Karnataka 14.9% 15.4% 14.7% 14.2% 14.1%
Tamil Nadu 14.4% 14.5% 14.2% 13.8% 15.2%
Telangana 14.0% 15.9% 13.5% 13.7% 13.4%
Kerala 16.0% 17.3% 12.0% 13.8% 11.9%
Gujarat 15.0% 12.3% 11.7% 11.4% 13.8%
Daman and Diu 13.3% 10.7% 10.3% 12.1% 10.2%
Andhra Pradesh 9.4% 11.0% 8.7% 7.9% 10.3%
Dadra and Nagar Haveli NA 9.2% 6.1% 8.2% 9.9%
Himachal Pradesh 12.9% 8.5% 3.4% 13.3% 10.0%
UDAY states' average 20.74% 20.23% 18.70% 22.4% 20.9%
7
Profit and Loss (Rs. Cr.)
Profit and Loss (Rs. Cr.)
State
FY16 Change FY17 Change FY18 H1FY18 Change H1FY19
Uttar Pradesh (7689) (6619) (3430) (3537) (3094)
Jammu & Kashmir (4532) (3368) (3174) (1997) (2803)
Tamil Nadu (5787) (4349) (2975) (1119) (2601)
Telangana (1948) (6206) (2827) (336) (2472)
Madhya Pradesh (5751) (1468) (2194) (792) (1863)
Bihar (1074) (1419) (1053) (831) (1089)
Punjab (1989) (2836) (907) (1172) (322)
Kerala (517) (1098) (832) (548) (422)
Jharkhand (1162) (1741) (731) (523) (515)
Assam (363) (157) (401) (64) (333)
Meghalaya (193) (409) (317) (221) NA
Uttarakhand (125) (289) (229) (9) 17
Puducherry (8) (8) (206) (105) (25)
Dadra and Nagar Haveli NA (68) (56) 30 (11)
Tripura (57) (5) (25) 15 30
Karnataka (377) (698) (20) 1179 81
Manipur (124) (10) (5) (2) 0
Daman and Diu 28 26 5 4 5
Andhra Pradesh (3899) (2331) 7 (84) (172)
Himachal Pradesh (3) (44) 14 50 (3)
Goa 0 15 31 31 0
Chhattisgarh (541) 451 103 196 7
Gujarat 178 275 339 153 226
Haryana (808) (193) 412 (1255) (1071)
Maharashtra (3499) (3348) 847 258 153
Rajasthan (11241) (1981) 2573 (612) 1198
UDAY states‘ total (51480) (37877) (15049) (11071) (15080)

8
ACS-ARR Gap (Rs/unit)
ACS-ARR Gap (Rs./kWh)
State
FY16 Change FY17 Change FY18 H1FY18 Change H1FY19
Jammu & Kashmir 2.55 2.15 1.96 2.55 3.36
Meghalaya 0.88 1.99 1.30 1.67 NA
Jharkhand 1.22 1.39 0.57 0.81 1.59
Telangana 0.69 1.24 0.55 0.11 0.85
Punjab 0.53 0.65 0.48 0.98 0.77
Assam 0.58 0.30 0.43 0.13 0.61
Goa 1.50 0.95 0.41 0.20 1.72
Bihar 0.65 0.59 0.39 0.58 0.37
Madhya Pradesh 0.92 0.24 0.33 0.31 0.60
Uttar Pradesh 0.88 0.62 0.28 0.54 0.48
Kerala 0.23 0.53 0.27 0.22 0.33
Tamil Nadu 0.60 0.39 0.27 0.22 0.45
Uttarakhand 0.10 0.22 0.17 0.01 (0.02)
Manipur 1.31 0.10 0.08 (0.08) 1.41
Tripura 0.24 0.02 0.08 (0.10) (0.19)
Karnataka 0.06 0.06 0.07 (0.26) 0.03
Dadra and Nagar Haveli NA 0.27 0.06 (0.10) 0.03
Andhra Pradesh 0.82 0.44 0.02 0.03 0.05
Puducherry 0.03 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daman and Diu (0.11) (0.11) (0.02) (0.03) (0.04)
Haryana 0.18 0.04 (0.02) 0.44 0.35
Chhattisgarh 0.18 (0.15) (0.03) (0.12) 0.24
Gujarat (0.02) (0.03) (0.04) (0.04) (0.05)
Maharashtra 0.30 0.28 (0.07) (0.04) (0.02)
Himachal Pradesh (0.32) 0.21 (0.09) (0.14) 0.25
Rajasthan 1.65 0.29 (0.33) 0.16 (0.30)
UDAY states' average 0.59 0.41 0.17 0.26 0.33
9
Source: UDAY Portal
State-wise reasons for change in revenue/ expenditure in FY18
All figures in Rs. Cr.
States which have reduced book losses in FY18 as compared to FY17
State Increase in Expenditure Increase in Revenue Major reason for higher/lower expenditure Major reason for higher/lower revenue
Andhra Pradesh 3,278 5,617 Rise in power purchase cost Increase in energy supply, Tariff hike
Bihar 1,176 1,542 Increase in energy procured, Rise in power purchase cost Tariff hike
Dadra and Nagar Haveli 364 376 Increase in energy procured Increase in energy supply
Goa (33) (17) Decrease in power purchase and establishment cost NA
Gujarat 2,698 2,762 Increase in energy procured, Rise in establishment cost Increase in energy supply, increase in billing efficiency
Haryana 1,717 2,322 Increase in energy procured, Rise in establishment cost Increase in billing efficiency, Increase in energy supply
Himachal Pradesh 72 130 Rise in establishment cost Tariff hike
Jammu & Kashmir 213 407 Increase in energy procured, Rise in power purchase cost Increase in energy supply
Jharkhand 915 1,926 Rise in establishment cost Tariff hike
Karnataka 3,309 3,987 Increase in energy procured, power purchase & establ. cost Tariff hike
Kerala 677 943 Rise in power purchase cost Tariff hike and increase in billing efficiency
Maharashtra 6,039 10,234 Increase in energy procured, Rise in power purchase cost Tariff hike, Increase in energy supply
Manipur 32 37 Rise in power purchase cost Increase in energy supply, Increase in billing efficiency
Meghalaya 19 112 Increase in energy procured Tariff hike, Increase in billing efficiency
Punjab 2,410 4,339 Increase in energy procured, Rise in establishment cost Tariff hike
Rajasthan 10,201 14,755 Increase in energy procured, Rise in interest cost Increase in energy supply, billing efficiency & tariff hike
Tamil Nadu 4,923 6,297 Rise in power purchase cost Tariff hike
Telangana (2,705) 674 Decrease in power purchase cost Increase in energy supply
Uttar Pradesh 3,709 6,898 Increase in energy procured, establ. cost, and interest cost Increase in energy supply, Tariff hike
Uttarakhand 687 747 Rise in power purchase cost Increase in energy supply, tariff hike

States which have increased book losses in FY18 as compared to FY17

Increase in
State Increase in Expenditure Major reason for higher/lower expenditure Major reason for higher/lower revenue
Revenue
Assam 878 634 Increase in energy procured, power purchase & establ. cost Increase in energy supply, Tariff hike
Chhattisgarh 1,929 1,581 Increase in energy procured Increase in energy supply
Daman and Diu 88 67 Rise in power purchase cost Increase in energy supply, Increase in billing efficiency
Madhya Pradesh 536 (190) Increase in energy procured Decrease in other income and billing efficiency
Puducherry 198 (1) Rise in power purchase cost NA
Tripura 334 314 Increase in energy procured, Rise in power purchase cost Increase in energy supply
Borrowing Status
 Fresh Borrowings by DISCOMs during UDAY period
All figures in Rs. Lakh crore
Loans under other
DISCOM Liabilities to be restructured with comprehensive MoUs as on 30-09-2015 schemes * 3.24 (DISCOM Liabilities for
Sept
2.69 0.55 states with comprehensive
2015 MoUs as on 30-09-2015)
DISCOM bonds
Total Bonds issued by State Pending
Issued
2.09 0.23 0.37 2.69
Converted to Grant/ Equity (State has
taken full liability) Amount pending

1.24 0.85
2.09
Debt to be converted by
the end of FY19
1.24 0.59 0.26 Debt to be converted post FY19

Balance outstanding of previous loans with DISCOMs

1.22 2.02
Outstanding loans as on March 2018 in Rs. Crore
March
2018 3.52
Balance outstanding of previous loans with DISCOMs Fresh loans created during UDAY period

2.02 1.5

*such as R-APDRP / FRP/ IPDS

Actual and expected borrowings by states during the UDAY
Actual fresh borrowings after UDAY
Net fresh borrowing Capex loan from Counterpart funding for
(UDAY Period) PFC/REC Central schemes Effective fresh borrowings

1.58 L Cr 0.29 L Cr 0.07 L Cr 1.22 L Cr

Expected borrowings after UDAY

Accumulated loss Permitted Working capital Borrowings expected Actual fresh borrowings
(UDAY Period) loan under UDAY In UDAY

1.22 L Cr
0.66 L Cr 0.88 L Cr 1.53 L Cr
<

DISCOMs have managed

finances with much lesser debts
As envisaged after UDAY
State Wise borrowing status by states during the UDAY period
Net fresh Permitted
Counterpart
borrowing Capex loan Effective fresh Accumulated Working
funding for Expected
(UDAY from PFC/REC borrowings losses H2 FY16 to capital loan
State Central schemes borrowings
Period) (Rs. Cr) (Rs. Cr) FY18 (Rs. Crore) under UDAY
(Rs. Cr) after UDAY
(Rs. Cr) (B) (D=A-B-C) (E) (Rs. Cr)
(C )
(A) (G)

Tamil Nadu* 69,743

- 1,929
- 834 = 66,980 > 24,220 = 10,217 14,003
Rajasthan 15,644
- 7,352
-- 214 = 8,078 < 17,434 = 7,602 9,832
Uttar Pradesh 28,498
- 3,008 2,616 = 22,874 < 25,627 = 13,893 11,734
Chhattisgarh 3,412
- 1,312
- 90
= 2,010 < 3,481 = 270 3,211
Punjab
Bihar
9,032
777
-- 1,241
955
-- 451
349
=
=
7,340
0
<
<
11,026
5,820
=
=
4,738
3,009
6,288
2,811
Andhra Pradesh 3,537
- 2,287
-- 502 = 748 < 11,165 = 4,281 6,344
Madhya Pradesh 10,849
- 951 567 = 9,331 < 13,624 = 6,537 7,807
Maharashtra 6,014
- 5,491
- 1,047 = 0 < 21,397 = 5,097 16,300
Himachal Pradesh
Telangana
1,195
8,826
-- 326
4,365
-- 7
57
=
=
862
4,404
<
<
1,701
16,440
=
=
46
10,007
1,655
6,433
Assam 985
-- -
- 62 = 923 < 1,916 = 739 1,177
Total 158,512 29,217
- 6,795 = 122,500 < 1,53,845 = 66,436 87,595

States with working capital loans greater than permitted values States with working capital loans lower than permitted values
under UDAY under UDAY

* Figures for TANGEDCO include Generation business also

 Analysis of financial
condition: Distribution
Utilities
ACS-ARR Gap (Rs/unit)
ACS-ARR Gap (Rs./kWh)
State
FY16 Change FY17 Change FY18 H1FY18 Change H1FY19
Jammu & Kashmir 2.55 2.15 1.96 2.55 3.36
Meghalaya 0.88 1.99 1.30 1.67 NA
Jharkhand 1.22 1.39 0.57 0.81 1.59
Telangana 0.69 1.24 0.55 0.11 0.85
Punjab 0.53 0.65 0.48 0.98 0.77
Assam 0.58 0.30 0.43 0.13 0.61
Goa 1.50 0.95 0.41 0.20 1.72
Bihar 0.65 0.59 0.39 0.58 0.37
Madhya Pradesh 0.92 0.24 0.33 0.31 0.60
Uttar Pradesh 0.88 0.62 0.28 0.54 0.48
Kerala 0.23 0.53 0.27 0.22 0.33
Tamil Nadu 0.60 0.39 0.27 0.22 0.45
Uttarakhand 0.10 0.22 0.17 0.01 (0.02)
Manipur 1.31 0.10 0.08 (0.08) 1.41
Tripura 0.24 0.02 0.08 (0.10) (0.19)
Karnataka 0.06 0.06 0.07 (0.26) 0.03
Dadra and Nagar Haveli NA 0.27 0.06 (0.10) 0.03
Andhra Pradesh 0.82 0.44 0.02 0.03 0.05
Puducherry 0.03 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daman and Diu (0.11) (0.11) (0.02) (0.03) (0.04)
Haryana 0.18 0.04 (0.02) 0.44 0.35
Chhattisgarh 0.18 (0.15) (0.03) (0.12) 0.24
Gujarat (0.02) (0.03) (0.04) (0.04) (0.05)
Maharashtra 0.30 0.28 (0.07) (0.04) (0.02)
Himachal Pradesh (0.32) 0.21 (0.09) (0.14) 0.25
Rajasthan 1.65 0.29 (0.33) 0.16 (0.30)
UDAY states' average 0.59 0.41 0.17 0.26 0.33
16
Source: UDAY Portal
 Financial status of UDAY states as in 2017-18

Annual Book loss ~15,000 Cr

Estimated loss due to non-

~8500 Cr Loss due to inefficiency
achievement of approved T&D

Estimated revenue loss due to

~22,000 Cr* Loss due to costs not
creation of RA 6.6 6.6
allowed in tariff

* This is an annual estimated, given that ~56,000 Cr of RA have been created during UDAY period of 2.5 years
Losses being borne by states due to non-achievement of approved T&D losses
Losses to DISCOMs
Actual T&D losses Approved T&D Per unit
S.no DISCOM State due to non-achievement of approved T&D
for FY18 losses (%) Impact
losses (Rs. Crores)
1 TSSPDCL Telangana 11% 5% 1,172 0.33
2 MPPoKVVCL Madhya Pradesh 27% 17% 1,087 0.55
3 MPMKVVCL Madhya Pradesh 28% 18% 1,074 0.51
4 JK-PDD Jammu & Kashmir 48% 33% 949 0.58
5 DVVNL Uttar Pradesh 26% 20% 764 0.28
6 TSNPDCL Telangana 11% 5% 528 0.30
7 MSEDCL Maharashtra 14% 13% 452 0.04
8 JDVVNL Rajasthan 19% 17% 430 0.18
9 JVVNL Rajasthan 20% 19% 393 0.13
10 AVVNL Rajasthan 20% 18% 351 0.17
11 PUVVNL Uttar Pradesh 22% 20% 286 0.10
12 UHBVNL Haryana 25% 25% 286 0.12
13 MVVNL Uttar Pradesh 21% 19% 225 0.10
14 MPPKVVCL Madhya Pradesh 17% 16% 205 0.09
15 BESCOM Karnataka 13% 13% 88 0.03
16 MeECL Meghalaya 30% 23% 58 0.23
17 APDCL Assam 18% 17% 32 0.03
18 UPCL Uttarakhand 15% 15% 18 0.01
19 CESC Karnataka 13% 13% 17 0.02
20 GESCOM Karnataka 16% 16% 14 0.02
21 KSEBL Kerala 11% 10% 12 0.01
UDAY states’ average 16% 15% 8,442 0.08
 In case the of Bihar and Jharkhand, state government is extending financial support in case distribution losses exceed the trajectory approved
 For Haryana and Maharashtra, two-third of the distribution losses over the approved value is borne by the DISCOMs while the remaining amount is
passed to the consumer. Back
Losses being borne by states due to non-achievement of 15% T&D losses
Losses to DISCOMs
Actual T&D Reduced T&D losses to Per unit
S.no DISCOM State due to non-achievement of
losses for FY18 15% wherever higher (%) impact
15% T&D losses (Rs. Crores)
1 JK-PDD Jammu & Kashmir 47.5% 15% 2,056 1.27
2 DVVNL Uttar Pradesh 26.0% 15% 1,423 0.52
3 MPMKVVCL Madhya Pradesh 27.9% 15% 1,399 0.66
4 MPPoKVVCL Madhya Pradesh 27.1% 15% 1,304 0.66
5 JVVNL Rajasthan 20.5% 15% 1,084 0.36
6 PUVVNL Uttar Pradesh 22.1% 15% 869 0.30
7 MVVNL Uttar Pradesh 21.0% 15% 732 0.31
8 UHBVNL Haryana 24.8% 15% 727 0.32
9 AVVNL Rajasthan 20.1% 15% 683 0.33
10 JDVVNL Rajasthan 19.3% 15% 663 0.27
11 CSPDCL Chhattisgarh 18.1% 15% 465 0.15
12 PSVVNL Uttar Pradesh 16.9% 15% 382 0.10
13 MPPKVVCL Madhya Pradesh 17.0% 15% 276 0.12
14 APDCL Assam 17.6% 15% 156 0.17
15 MeECL Meghalaya 29.9% 15% 121 0.48
16 GESCOM Karnataka 16.3% 15% 61 0.08
17 MSPDCL Manipur 23.4% 15% 38 0.36
UDAY states’ average 16% 13% 12,450 0.12

Back
Overall accumulated Regulatory Asset before UDAY were more than 70,000 Cr.
Additional Regulatory Assets created during UDAY period have been ~ 56,000 Cr

Accumulated Accumulated Regulatory assets

State Regulatory Asset Regulatory created during
–FY16 Asset –FY18 UDAY period
Uttar Pradesh 20,261 33,000 12,739
Rajasthan 51,867 40,116 -

Chhattisgarh 0 761 761

Maharashtra 0 9795 9,795

Assam 658 1237 579
Tamil Nadu 0 32,532 32,532
Assuming annual creation
Total 56,406 Cr ~ 22,000 Cr of RA during
UDAY period
Carrying costs of Rs. 13,500 Cr. is about 1.5 times the losses due to non achievement of approved T&D values Back
Landed cost of Power Back
Power purchase Cost increased to Rs. 4.30/kWh in H1FY19 against Rs. 4.12/kWh in H1FY18 due to increase in the
price of coal and railway freight; rise in electricity demand and increase in short term procurement; and increase in
point of connection (POC) drawal charges All figures in Rs./kWh
4.30

4.23
4.20

4.13
4.19

FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY18 H1FY19

Power Purchase Costs in H1 FY19 UDAY States’ average for H1FY19: Rs. 4.30 per kWh
5.10
4.74 4.73 4.65 4.58 4.48 4.48 4.46 4.44 4.38 4.38
3.89 3.88 3.76 3.76
3.46 3.42 3.31 3.21
2.29

a a
am
a
ha
r
es
h
es
h u
es
h ra an nd at pu
r
ar
h ala jab iu oa es
h
gan atak ss y an i d d ad d sht sth ha jar i g er n D G d
lan n ar B
Pr
a
Pr
a N
Pr
a
ar
a
aja
k u an is K Pu d
Pr
a
e ar A H a r m
il
a h R tara G M h att an l
T K hr tta Ta hy M
a
U
t
Ch an c ha
n d U ad a m a 21
Source: UDAY portal A M D im
H
 Back
Delay in payment of dues by Government Departments

12,166 Total dues of UDAY states H1 FY19

All figures in Rs. Cr.
10,230
H1FY18 Rs. 33,651 Cr.

H1FY19 Rs. 40,580 Cr.

6,084 5,970

4,650
4,143
3,862

2,901
2,011 1,778
1,560 1,348 1,566
1,191
949 1,154 1,124 969 779 963 879 789 879 733
423 533 288 368 356 368

Source: UDAY portal

Note: Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Puducherry have submitted data till Q1 FY19 22
High Govt. Department dues exist with high liabilities of ED on balance sheet
Proper transactions between the States and DISCOMs for each other’s dues (ED+Govt dept usage of electricity) and
their correct accountal would improve Collection efficiency, which is highly understated, as well as AT&C losses
Outstanding Electricity Duty Payable to
Electricity Duty
government department State Government as on Balance State dues after
S. No. State Recovery during
dues as on Mar’18 Mar’18 (Rs Crore) / as a % netting off against ED
FY18
(Rs Crore) of dues

1 Rajasthan 405 297 (73%) 108 1,323

2 Uttar Pradesh 11,176 7,057 (63%) 4,119 1,649
3 Chhattisgarh 1,451 45 (3%) 1,406 0
4 Punjab 1,006 1,500 (149%) 0 2,309
5 Bihar 765 53 (7%) 712 398
6 Andhra Pradesh 3,768 165 (4%) 3,603 220
7 Madhya Pradesh 762 161 (21%) 601 1,534
8 Maharashtra 5,419 4,435 (82%) 984 0
9 Telangana 5,125 0 (0%) 5,125 186
10 Tamil Nadu 1,396 716 (51%) 680 1,065
Total 31,273 14,429 (46%) 16,844 8,684

Collection efficiency tends to show an improvement of 4% and improvement of ~2.5% in AT&C losses with
outstanding dues set-off against ED
Extent of Cross Subsidization in total Revenue
• Despite increase in Booked Subsidies and Tariffs, Cross Subsidies have increased unabated.
• Trends indicate an unsustainable tariff structure going forward.
• Solution: If tariff shocks are to be avoided, Subsidy support from states should increase further.

45 %

42%
40 %

Subsidy Booked
35 %

30 %
29%

25 %

20%
20 %

15 %

12%
11% 11%
Cross Subsidy in Total Revenue
12%
10 %
9%
5%
4% Average Tariff Revision
5%

2%
0%
0%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

* For UDAY states

Issue of Payment to
Generators
 Issue of Payments to Generators
 Present payable situation: Year
Nov Month Annual Billed Amt. for Overdue as % of
Overdue (Rs Cr) the FY (Rs Cr) Revenue
2017 18,117 4,52,376 4.0%
2018 22,061 5,10,904 4.3%

 Payment and Recovery Cycles are skewed.

Coal payment Electricity generation

Invoicing Payment due Payment due
& dispatch
for IPP for cost plus
15 days 25 days 30 days 30 days
Generator
0 day 15th day 40th day 70th day 100th day

Collection in
Collection in Bi-monthly
monthly billing billing scenario Realization
Electricity received time in
scenario
account
45 days
60 days
Discom
15th day 60th day 75th day 80th day
Major Contributing States & UT in total overdue amount
73% Overdue1 amount concentrated in 7 states.
Total Overdue: 22,061 Cr
45 00
Total from shown states & UT: 18,091 Cr (82%)
2 0%

4,068
18%
1 8%

40 00

1 6%

35 00

3,049
14% 1 4%

30 00

1 2%

2,259
25 00

10%
2,074
9% 2,075
9% 1 0%

20 00

1,783
8%
1,551
8%

7%

1,233
15 00

6% 6%

10 00

4%

5 00

2%

0 0%

Uttar Pradesh Karnataka Tamilnadu J&K Andman & Telangana Rajasthan Madhya
Nicobar Pradesh

Overdue Percentage in Total All Figures in Rs Crores

1
Overdue Figures include amount under dispute/litigation except in case of Maharashtra
 Overdue Trend and Consumption Trends
Notable increase in months following above average increase in consumption

22 3 5%

Consumption Overdue
20
Overdue FY 2018 19
20

3 0%

18 18
17
16 16 19 1 1 0 ,0 0 0 1 8 ,2 0 0

16 18 18k Cr
17
5%
2 5%

15
15 22% 7% 108 BU 1 8 ,0 0 0

15
1 0 8 ,0 0 0

15 2 0%
1 7 ,8 0 0

17%
16%
1 0 6 ,0 0 0

10
Overdue FY 2018 1 5%
1 7 ,6 0 0

12% 1 0 4 ,0 0 0 1 7 ,4 0 0

11% 17k Cr
9% 1 0%

101 BU
1 7 ,2 0 0

7% 7% 7% 7%
6%
1 0 2 ,0 0 0

4% 5% 4%
1 7 ,0 0 0

5%

1 0 0 ,0 0 0

1% 1 6 ,8 0 0

-31%
- 0%

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 9 8 ,0 0 0

FY 2017 FY 2018
1 6 ,6 0 0

FY 2017 FY 2018

YoY increase (Overdue) YoY increase (Consumption) Average for the period of April to
Overdue (FY 2017) Overdue (FY 2018)
November
Overdue figures in Rs ‘000 Crores
Consumption figures in ‘000 MUs
Technology Related
Reforms
Technology Related Reforms for loss
reduction
• AT&C losses currently have annual financial implications of Rs 8,500 Crores out of estimated Losses of Rs 15,000
Crores (FY18)

• If allowable T&D losses pegged at 15%, contribution would increase to ~Rs 12,450 Crores

• AT&C losses mainly a managerial problem; can be tackled through minimizing human interface in
billing/collections, and by making theft difficult

• GOI has asked states to convert existing 25 Crores meters into Smart meters in prepaid mode in next three years
• Enable real time energy audits and detection of loss pockets
• Prepaid mode would reduce revenue risk to DISCOMs
• Would help in precipitating advance payment mode in complete value chain from consumers to Coal Sectors
• Basic building block of smart grids
• Enabler for RE integration, TOD tariffs and Demand side management
• ABC cabling would help reduce possibilities of theft through hooking
 Smart metering in India
• With EESL as aggregator on Revenue sharing model –
No. of meters
Discom/ State Agency No. of meters Remarks
installed
NDMC, Delhi LnT & Genus 54,000 52,000 • Implemented successfully
UP LnT & Genus 40,00,000 98,000 • Under implementation
• Software integration in process
Haryana LnT & Genus 10,00,000
• Consumer Indexing in progress in Karnal & Gurgaon

• Other projects –
No. of meters No. of meters
Discom, State Agency Remarks
targeted installed
• Implemented successfully
CESC, Kolkata Secure Meters 25,000 25,000
• RF Communication mode used
TSECL, • Implemented on PLCC
Wipro & Powercom 45,000 45,000
Tripura • Under commercial run
CESCOM, • Implemented successfully
Enzen global 24,000 24,000
Karnataka • RF Communication mode used
• Meters supplied.
UGVCL,
Genus 24,000 24,000 • DC hardware installed
Gujarat
• Meter installation is under progress
Smart Metering projects under IPDS
• GOI has sanctioned Smart Meters under IPDS System strengthening projects –
Project Category Sanctioned Quantity Awarded Quantity Completed Quantity
Under System 75,000
1,82,000 38,500
Strengthening project (MP West)

• Additionally, 41 lac Smart meters sanctioned under Smart Metering system

component of IPDS
• IPDS funding - 60% (85% for special category states) admissible for CAPEX portion (i.e. cost of smart
meters, head end system and communication equipment) limited to a maximum of Rs.2000/- per node
• IPDS is a CAPEX oriented scheme - ownership of Smart meters would be transferred to Discom upon
expiry of Contracts entered into for revenue models
• Discoms to ensure that Smart meters are integrated with MBC (Metering, Billing & Collection) and
Energy Audit application modules established under R-APDRP to derive benefits from Smart metering
solution
Smart Metering projects under IPDS
Sanctioned
Towns Sanctioned
Consumer Status
SN Discom State covered cost
Nodes
(Nos.) (Rs. Cr) (Nos.)
1 APEPDCL 37 57 2,84,444 • MoU signed with EESL for 18 lac meters.
AP
2 APSPDCL 1 5 25,000
3 NBPDCL 72 70 3,50,700 • MOU signed with EESL for 18 lac meters
• Work awarded to “EDF” as SI and “Genus
meters” as meters supplier.
Bihar • 128 No. of Smart meters installed at Maurya
4 SBPDCL 58 87 4,34,600 Lok in Patna for Proof of Concept (PoC)
• 17 in agricultural feeder in Naubatpur and
Hajipur. PoC is under progress
• Awarded for 2.81 lac meters in Aug 2018
5 JVVNL 2 56 2,81,782 • No progress since award
Raj
6 AVVNL 66 38 1,88,860
• DRC approval obtained. NIT to be floated
7 JdVVNL 1 19 97,158
Smart Metering projects under IPDS
Sanctioned
Towns Sanctioned
Consumer Status
SN Discom State covered cost
Nodes
(Nos.) (Rs. Cr) (Nos.)
8 CSPDCL CG 4 36 1,81,997 • Utility yet to take decision
• NIT floated on 25.07.2018
9 KSEBL Kerala 63 64 3,21,800 • Bid opened on 30.01.2019, no further
movement
• Tender scrapped due to poor response from
bidders (qty- 66000)
10 PSPCL Punjab 1 18 88,100
• In discussion with EESL /PFCCL – no
movement

11 MP (West) MP 1 69 3,45,450 • Discom yet to finalse action plan

12 TSNPDCL 1 13 65,000
• MOU signed with EESL, Rates to be given
Telangana
by EESL
13 TSSPDCL 1 3 13,000
Smart Metering projects under IPDS
Sanctioned
Towns Sanctioned
Consumer Status
SN Discom State covered cost
Nodes
(Nos.) (Rs. Cr) (Nos.)
14 DGVCL 1 7 32,882
• Bids received for pilot project for 18230
15 MGVCL 5 20 1,00,000
Gujarat meters
16 PGVCL 2 18 90,051
• Bid opened, Under technical evaluation
17 UGVCL 1 8 38,950
18 HESCOM 3 69 3,43,100
Kar • Discoms yet to finalise action plan
19 CESC 1 67 3,32,850
• In discussion with PFCCL – Board decision
20 HPSEBL HP 2 27 1,35,700
awaited
• NIT floated.
21 MSEDCL MH 10 80 4,00,000
• Bid opening date is under extension
Total 333 831 41,51,424
 Aerial Bunched cables under IPDS
• States have been implementing various measures for theft reduction
• ~ 70,000 km Aerial Bunched cables sanctioned under IPDS of which 30,000 km installed
Sanctioned Awarded Completed Sanctioned Awarded Completed
S.No State S.No State
(Qty) (Qty) (Qty) (Qty) (Qty) (Qty)
1Andhra Pradesh 292 292 267 15Manipur 1005 1005 187
2Arunachal Pradesh 57 50 0 16Mizoram 115 90 28
3Assam 1428 2464 229 17Odisha 3418 3520 1415
4Bihar 9102 5897 3410 18Puducherry 8 0 0
5Chhattisgarh 3474 3474 652 19Punjab 413 413 42
6Gujarat 4985 5284 5001 20Rajasthan 1598 251 12
7Haryana 1072 1100 383 21Sikkim 31 0 0
8Himachal Pradesh 420 422 22 22Tamil Nadu 161 161 17
9Jammu & Kashmir 2578 1958 0 23Telangana 513 478 292
10Jharkhand 2487 2487 610 24Tripura 474 90 90
11Karnataka 2182 2195 1138 25Uttar Pradesh 10343 9522 6885
12Kerala 1152 1152 137 26Uttarakhand 819 754 568
13Madhya Pradesh 4319 5794 2025 27West Bengal 14504 14504 5799
14Maharashtra 2092 2087 566   Total 69042 65444 29775
 Aerial Bunched cables
• Installation of AB Cables in Bihar has shown good results in reduction of losses as
illustrated below-
LT AB Cable installed AT & C Losses in AT & C Losses in
Reduction in
Sl No Towns upto Jan'19 % %
AT&C losses in %
Qty (km) (Jan'17) (Jan'19)
1Munger 24.30 51.30 26.22 25.08
2Barbigha 15.50 76.90 61.93 14.97
3Lakhisarai 20.50 60.80 53.89 6.91
4Jamui 30.50 45.40 21.49 23.91
5Naugachhia 46.80 55.40 25.12 30.28
6Sultanganj 20.09 70.10 34.43 35.67
7Banka 41.60 42.50 30.85 11.65
8Dumraon 17.96 72.70 40.55 32.15
9Warsaliganj 16.50 34.80 20.31 14.49
10Buxar 81.40 49.30 34.78 14.52
Smart Metering
Project - Uttar
Pradesh
Scheme for Smart metering in
prepaid mode
Scheme for Smart metering in prepaid mode
 Broad contours and objectives
• AT&C loss reduction
• Convert all 25 Crore consumer meters to AMI in next three years
• Innovative financing:
o No upfront payments by DISCOMs; No upfront payment by Consumers
o Payment of ~Rs 50 per month per meter (Rs 25-30 already being spent in billing & collection)

• Increase Private investment with responsibility in Distribution Sector

 Estimated costs: Rs 70,000 Crores
 Project timeline including support: 7 years
 Timeline for installation of meters: 3 years
 Project type: TOTEX model on annuity basis
Smart metering Scheme structure
 Scheme to be operated by special SPV constituted through PSUs
 Participating PSUs to provide equity; some equity support by GOI
 SPV would aggregate demand of smart meters from all States/ DISCOMs; MOUs with States/DISCOMs
 Plan of implementation:
• First Year: 5 Crore meters
• Second and third years: 20 Crore meters
 SPV would contract:
• Meter asset providers : for providing meters on lease
• Communication providers: for providing communication system and meter data management
 As a headstart, SPV would procure the first 5 Crore meters (act as a meter asset provider)
 SPV would plan all CAPEX (equity + debt) out of its own resources, and with GOI support
 Meter to be transferred to Utility after seven years, and/or extend contract.
 SPV to get monthly rentals per meter as per
agreement with State/Utility
• Likely to be ~ Rs 50 per meter for 7 year project

Smart SPV would apportion the amounts to

communication providers and Asset providers
metering
To provide confidence to private investors,
Scheme predefined default risk guarantees to be provided
structure: • By GOI (@ 50% coverage of default risk of 20%)
• By States?
Contd… Outcome:
• Leveraging Rs 70,000 Crore investment, with low Govt
support
• Reduction in AT&C losses
 Proposed Scheme outlay - Rs 37,443.22
crore.

GBS of Rs 23,183.78 crore.

Scheme for
• Rs 22,813.03 crore as grant to States.
• Rs 370.72 crore for nodal fee and enabling activities.

ABC cabling Coverage:  

• AB cabling in 20% of areas with higher than 25% AT&C
losses)

Duration of the scheme: 5 years from the

date of approval of the scheme.
 Quantum of Support as
GoI Grant
(% of Project Cost)
Nature of
Agency
Fund Other than
Special
• The states have been categorized
special in two groups
category
category
states
states • Special Category States (All
Govt. of India Grant 60 85 North Eastern States including
DISCOM Contribution* Own Fund
10 5 Sikkim, J&K, Himachal
Lender (FIs/ Banks)/ Loan
Pradesh, Uttarakhand)
DISCOMs’ own fund 30 10
• Other than Special Category
*Minimum contribution by DISCOMs shall be 10% (5% in case of States (all other States).
Special Category States). However, DISCOMs contribution can go up to
40% (15% in case of Special Category States), if they do not intend to
avail loan

Scheme for ABC cabling:

Proposed Funding Mechanism
Scheme for ABC cabling: Coverage and
Eligibility criteria
 All DISCOMs and State Power Departments excluding private sector DISCOMs, provided:
 R-APDRP/ RGGVY has been closed and IPDS/ DDUGJY system strengthening work
completed in the area.
 DISCOMs receiving upfront payments against subsidies.
 AT&C loss of the area is more than 25%
 DPRs to be prioritized based of MU saving capability of the area.
 DISCOMs to identify the areas for AB cabling, considering (i)
Loss level (ii) Safety (iii) Reliability

Scheme for
BOQ to be based on actual survey and latest approved
schedule of rates.

ABC cabling:
DPR Loss reduction potential to meet IRR requirement of more
than 10%.
formulation
& scope
DPRs to be recommended by DRC at the State level and
DISHA at District level before submitting to the Nodal
Agency through online portal.

Monitoring Committee to approve the DPRs after appraisal

by the Nodal Agency.
 DPR cost approved by the Monitoring Committee or
award cost of the project, whichever is less, to be the
eligible cost for GoI Grant.

Scheme for Cost overrun due to any reasons shall not be eligible
for GoI grant and to be borne by the DISCOMs / State
ABC cabling: Governments.

DPR Following works/ items not covered:

formulation
and scope
• Works already sanctioned under any other schemes.
• Cost of land and Compensation towards right of way
• Office equipment / fixtures
• Spares (other than mandatory spares prescribed by manufacturer)
• Tools and Plants (T&P)
• Vehicles
• Salaries and Establishment Expenditure.
State-wise details
 Back
Andhra Pradesh: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 9.4% 11.0% 8.7% 11.7% 7.9% 10.3%
Billing Efficiency % 92.6% 92.7% 92.9% 92.8% 92.9% 93.1%
Collection Efficiency % 97.9% 96.0% 98.3%   95.1% 99.2% 96.3%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.82 0.44 0.02 0.21 0.03 0.05
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (3899) (2331) 7 (533) (84) (172)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.70 4.25 4.64 4.18 4.56 4.48

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 257298 86575 86575 100% 661037 343873 52%
DT Metering (Urban) 43431 10649 6472 61% 56268 49903 89%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 74950 358 0% 399713 358 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 168442 1445 1% 1671543 1445 0%

49
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Assam: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 25.5% 23.8% 15.7% 24.5% 22.0% 21.2%
Billing Efficiency % 81.9% 82.1% 82.4% 80.8% 76.7% 81.6%
Collection Efficiency % 91.0% 92.8% 102.3%   93.4% 101.7% 96.6%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.58 0.30 0.43 0.35 0.13 0.61
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (363) (157) (401) (120) (64) (333)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.40 4.62 4.80 4.28 4.36 4.73

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 21265 4700 0 0% 60199 21265 35%
Feeder Segregation 0 746 166 22% 878 166 19%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 31000 5737 19% 31000 5737 19%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 87500 7703 9% 150000 7703 5%

50
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Bihar: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 43.7% 39.0% 33.2% 42.1% 40.3% 39.0%
Billing Efficiency % 60.7% 66.9% 70.0% 65.4% 68.4% 70.3%
Collection Efficiency % 92.8% 91.3% 95.5%   88.6% 87.3% 86.8%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.65 0.59 0.39 0.67 0.58 0.37
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (1074) (1419) (1053) (825) (831) (1089)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.39 4.18 4.55 4.04 4.37 4.58

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Overall %age
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 9766 98513 72508 73.6% 108279 72508 66.9%
DT Metering (Urban) 14442 0 14442 100% 14442 14442 100%
Feeder Segregation 0 566 489 86.3% 566 489 37.2%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 197832 0 0% 197832 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 252087 0 0% 336116 0 0%
51
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Chhattisgarh: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 21.8% 19.3% 18.8% 36.9% 21.6% 21.57%
Billing Efficiency % 78.5% 81.4% 81.9% 80.1% 79.6% 84.17%
Collection Efficiency % 99.7% 99.0% 99.1%   78.8% 93.39% 93.19%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.18 -0.15 -0.03 -0.25 -0.12 0.00
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (541) (788.12) * 103 (394.06)* 196 7
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 3.68 4.20 3.84 4.06 3.73 3.76

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Overall %age
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 29046 84757 31849 38% 84757 31849 38%
DT Metering (Urban) 33271 52600 35854 68% 52600 35854 68%
Feeder Segregation 0 947 209 22% 1280 540 42%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 292984 0 0% 488307 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 388288 0 0% 652146 0 0%

Note: Data as per UDAY portal 52

* Audited figure ( Mail has been sent with a request for allowing audited fig to be incorporated in the portal, but permission still awaited from MOP)
 Back
Dadra & Nagar Haveli: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % NA 9.23 6.09 9.74 8.18 9.85
Billing Efficiency % NA 94.43 95.58 94.43 95.24 96
Collection Efficiency % NA 96.12 98.26   95.58 96.41 93.9
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh NA 0.27 0.06 0.39 -0.1 0.03
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. NA (68) (56) (58) 29.5 (11)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh NA 5.11 4.02 4.69 3.94 4.51

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year
Parameters Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement Overall %age
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18

Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 NA 0 0% NA 0 0%

Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 NA 0 0% NA 0 0%

Note: Data as per UDAY portal

53
 Back
Daman & Diu: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 13.3% 10.6% 10.3% 11.1% 12.1% 10.2%
Billing Efficiency % 90.7% 90.8% 93.1% 90.9% 93.1% 93.2%
Collection Efficiency % 95.7% 98.4% 96.3%   97.9% 94.4% 96.3%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh -0.11 -0.11 -0.02 -0.23 -0.03 -0.04
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. 28 26 5 29 4 5
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 3.01 2.90 3.10 2.83 2.93 3.31

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year
Parameters Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement Overall %age
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18

Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 0 0 0% 3472 0 0%

Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 0 0 0% 9934 0 0%

Note: Data as per UDAY portal

54
 Back
Goa: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 17.12% 16.79% 16.12% 12.6% 18.6% 36.2%
Billing Efficiency % 87.13% 94.65% 90.81% 92.6% 91.6% 88.8%
Collection Efficiency % 95.13% 87.91% 92.37%   94.3% 88.8% 71.8%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 1.5 0.95 0.41 0.88 0.2 1.72
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. 0 15.09 30.65 15.09 30.65 0
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 3.34 2.96 2.81 2.81 2.43 3.20

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year
Parameters Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement Overall %age
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18

Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 0 0 0% 36163 0 0%

Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 0 0 0% 120307 0 0%

Note: Data as per UDAY portal

55
 Back
Gujarat: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 15.0% 12.3% 11.7% 13.7% 11.4% 13.8%
Billing Efficiency % 85.2% 87.6% 88.3% 86.4% 88.9% 86.4%
Collection Efficiency % 99.8% 100.1% 100.0%   100.0% 99.7% 99.8%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh -0.02 -0.03 -0.05 -0.04 -0.04 -0.05
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. 178 275 426 164 153 226
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.25 4.23 4.25 4.34 4.22 3.88

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year
Parameters Data Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18

Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 75000 0 0% 247583 0 0%

Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 135000 0 0% 632581 0 0%

56
Note: Data as per UDAY portal Data of FY 18 as per audited data
 Back
Haryana: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 29.8% 25.4% 20.3% 32.3% 26.1% 23.1%
Billing Efficiency % 72.3% 74.1% 79.1% 71.1% 76.7% 79.9%
Collection Efficiency % 97.1% 100.6% 100.8%   95.2% 96.3% 96.2%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.18 0.04 -0.08 * 0.46 0.44 0.35
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (808) (193) 412 (1154) (1255) (1071)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 5.05 ** 5.12 ** 4.50 4.96 ** 4.51 4.65

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall Overall Overall
Parameters
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- No. to be achievement %age
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18 achievement
DT Metering (Rural) 31549 32195 32195 100% 221897 63744 29%
DT Metering (Urban) 33805 17704 17704 100% 286069 51509 18%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 6583 6583 100% 431797 6583 2%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 3857 3857 100% 822747 3857 0%

* As per audited accounts of FY 2017-18, the per unit ACS-ARR gap was -0.08 as such, same has been revised in place of -0.02
** Figures of power purchase cost for the FY 2015-16, 2016-17 (H1) and 2016-17 will come out to Rs. 4.42 per unit, Rs. 4.42 per unit and Rs. 4.53 per unit respectively due to change
in the methodology by MoP mandatorily considering input purchased units instead of unit available for sale.
*** As per audited accounts of FY 2015-16, the per unit all other costs including Establishment cost, was 0.46 as such, same has been revised in place of 0.56.
**** Total Revenue for the FY 2015-16 was Rs. 27536 crore as such same has been mentioned against NA.
***** Entire subsidy booked was realized in the FY 2017-18 as such same has been revised in place of 7315.48.
Note: Data as per UDAY portal 57
 Back
Himachal Pradesh: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 12.9% 8.5% 12.1% 0.2% 13.3% 9.98%
Billing Efficiency % 88.0% 88.8% 89.3% 86.4% 90.1% 88.5%
Collection Efficiency % 97.0% 103.0% 98.4%   115.5% 96.2% 101.7%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh -0.32 0.21 -0.09 0.44 -0.14 0.25
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (3) (44) 14 (286) 50 (3)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 3.03 3.03 2.89 1.99 1.75 2.29

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Parameters Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 17286 8100 555 7% 29785 17841 60%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 111 379 286 75% 490 397 81%

58
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Jammu & Kashmir: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 61.6 61.34 53.7 71.7 55 52.8
Billing Efficiency % 46.2 53 52.5 47.3 55.5 64.5
Collection Efficiency % 83 73 88   60 81 73.1
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 2.55 2.15 1.95 3.32 2.55 3.36
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (4532) (3367) (3173) (2356) (1996) (2803)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 3.72 3.44 3.52 4.16 4.01 4.66

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Urban) 2178 9081 3279 36.1% 12442 5457 43.8%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 49952 0 0% 49952 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 582149 0 0% 582149 0 0%

Note: Data as per UDAY portal 59

* Data updated are provisional
 Back
Jharkhand: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19*
AT&C Losses % 34.7% 31.8% 31.67% 31.8% 31.67% 33.66%
Billing Efficiency % 71.6% 75.2% 80.52% 75.2% 80.52% 81.7%
Collection Efficiency % 91.2% 90.7% 84.86%   90.7% 84.86% 81.2%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 1.22 1.39 0.16 1.40 0.16 1.04
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (1162) (1741) (212.17) (871) (106) NA
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.53 4.33 4.61 4.34 4.61 NA

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 41622 21172 16,424 77.57% 62794 58046 92.43%
Feeder Segregation 0 460 0 0% 460 0 0%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 37148 0 0% 37148 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 75540 0 0% 125896 0 0%

Note: Data as per UDAY portal 60

* Data updated are provisional
 Back
Karnataka: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 14.9% 15.4% 14.5% 14.6% 14.2% 14.1%
Billing Efficiency % 86.1% 85.9% 86.3% 86.9% 88.8% 89.2%
Collection Efficiency % 98.9% 98.5% 99.1%   98.4% 96.7% 96.3%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.33 -0.26 0.03
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (377) (698) (20) (979) 1179 81
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.31 4.54 4.68 4.69 4.57 4.74

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Achieveme Achievement Overall
Parameters Data
Target
nt in
Overall Overall
%age
(April’16- (April’16- %age(April’1 No. to be achievemen achieveme
Sept’18) achieved t till Sept'18
Sept’18) 6-Sept’18) nt

DT Metering (Rural) 110455 41596 41596 100% 215286 152051 71%

Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 610 610 100% 137456 610 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 1876 1876 100% 291650 1876 1%

61
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Kerala: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 16.0% 17.3% 12.0% 17.4% 13.8% 11.9%
Billing Efficiency % 85.6% 86.6% 89.5% 85.9% 89.8% 90.4%
Collection Efficiency % 98.1% 95.5% 98.3%   96.1% 96.0% 97.5%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.23 0.53 0.27 0.54 0.22 0.33
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (517) (1098) (832) (544) (548) (422)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 2.81 3.05 3.59 2.99 3.62 3.46
Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18 achievement

DT Metering (Rural) 17365 7658 283 4% 50386 17648 35%

DT Metering (Urban) 8075 8368 8368 100% 23074 16443 71%
Feeder Segregation 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 6800 0 0% 136000 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 186250 0 0% 745000 0 0%
62
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Madhya Pradesh: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 24.0% 26.5% 29.7% 29.9% 32.4% NA
Billing Efficiency % 76.6% 78.4% 76.2% 77.6% 77.03% NA
Collection Efficiency % 99.3% 93.8% 92.1%   90.2% 87.78% NA
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.92 0.24 0.33 0.94 0.31 0.59
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (5751) (1468) (2194) (2519) (792) (1863)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.09 4.34 4.33 4.49 4.10 4.44

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievement Achievement Overall No. Overall
Parameters Overall %
Data (April’16- (April’16- in % (April’16- to be achievement achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 103923 100224 88179 88% 454194 192102 42%
DT Metering (Urban) 50733 17617 17617 100% 82693 68350 83%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 36140 102741 24030 23% 295644 60170 20%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 6618 8167 3817 47% 776487 10435 1%

63
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Maharashtra: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 19.1% 18.9% 17.4% 19.2% 18.7% 14.77%
Billing Efficiency % 85.5% 85.3% 86.1% 87.4% 85.6% 87.85%
Collection Efficiency % 94.7% 95.1% 95.9%   92.4% 95.0% 97.01%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.44 -0.26 -0.04 0.21 -0.04 -0.02
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (5409.77) 614.20 442 (2,705) 307 221
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.10 4.02 4.23 3.92 4.18 4.38

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18 achievement

DT Metering (Rural) 46119 10341 1407 14% 247708 47526 19%

DT Metering (Urban) 77875 16748 3206 19% 263323 81081 31%
Feeder Segregation 4,180 1,105 1,105 100% 7,355 5,285 72%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 15385 0 0% 15385 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 64680 0 0% 64680 0 0%
64
Note: Data as per UDAY portal. ACS-ARR gap and profit & loss values are as informed by the state.
 Back
Manipur: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 44.2% 36.9% 24.6% 37.6% 31.3% 45.7%
Billing Efficiency % 61.9% 71.7% 76.6% 67.8% 81.8% 88.7%
Collection Efficiency % 90.2% 88.0% 98.4%   92.0% 84.0% 61.2%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 1.31 0.10 0.08 0.16 -0.08 1.41
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (124) (10) (5) (10) (2) 0
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.09 3.10 3.51 2.72 3.35 3.76

Operational Parameters

Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress

Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 51420 66000 0 0% 134527 51420 38%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 123417 69000 0 0% 216940 123417 57%

65
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Meghalaya: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 36.5% 34.9% 34.6% 33.5% 32.5%
Billing Efficiency % 67.4% 67.2% 70.1% 69.1% 73.1%
Collection Efficiency % 94.3% 96.9% 93.2%   96.3% 92.3%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.88 1.99 1.30 1.83 1.67
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (193) (409) (317) (205) (221)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 3.35 4.15 3.63 3.83 3.56

Operational Parameters

Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress

Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 3096 951 0 0% 7599 3096 41%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 455 1039 1039 100% 86368 1494 2%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 1820 3409 3409 100% 189553 5229 3%

The state has not submitted data for H1 FY19 66

Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Puducherry: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY19 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 23.3% 19.0% 19.6% 18.38 20.8% 22.6% 18.38
Billing Efficiency % 86.4% 84.4% 86.0% 87.50 84.0% 83.2% 87.50
Collection Efficiency % 92.7% 96.0% 93.5% 93.28 94.3% 93.0% 93.28
 
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.03 -0.11 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (8) (8) (206) (16.05) (7) (105) (16.045)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 3.45 3.73 4.18 3.99 3.56 4.03 3.99

Operational Parameters

Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress

Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Overall %age
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18 achievement

DT Metering (Rural) 367 980 68 7% 2139 435 20%

DT Metering (Urban) 829 673 166 25% 1654 995 60%
Feeder Segregation 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0%

67
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Punjab: Performance of outcome parameters
Targets FY Targets FY
Parameters Unit 17 Targets FY 18 FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
19

AT&C Losses % 15.30% 14.50% 14.00% 15.9% 14.5% 17.3% 31.2% 32.6% 29.7%
Billing Efficiency % 84.70% 85.50% 86.00% 88.4% 88.0% 88.9% 82.4% 81.4% 84.4%

Collection Efficiency % 100% 100% 100% 95.1% 97.2% 93.0% 83.5% 82.8% 83.3%

ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.37 0.04 (0.09) 0.53 0.65 0.48 1.05 0.98 0.77

Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (1681) (220) 467 (1989) (2836) (907) (1103) (1172) (322)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.47 4.48 4.52 3.29 3.24 3.13 3.21 2.97 3.42

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Parameters Base year Data Target Achievement Achievement in Overall No. Overall Overall %age
(April’16- (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18 achievement

DT Metering (Rural) 969 118028 0 0% 118997 969 1%

DT Metering (Urban) 28650 44489 17443 39% 73139 46093 63%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 0 0 0% 697711 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 0 0 0% 934394 0 0%
68
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Rajasthan: Performance of outcome parameters Note: Data as per UDAY portal

Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19

AT&C Losses % 30.4% 26.0% 20.0% 30.8% 25.9% 26.0%
Billing Efficiency % 72.3% 76.7% 80.0% 78.1% 81.1% 81.1%
Collection Efficiency % 96.2% 96.4% 100.0%   88.6% 91.3% 91.2%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 1.65 0.36 -0.33 0.64 0.16 -0.30
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (11241) *(4818) *(2589) (1875) (612) 1198
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.20 4.36 4.39 4.30 4.43 4.38
Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 0 3486 0 0% 3486 0 0%
DT Metering (Urban) 0 60166 16844 28% 66459 16844 25%
Feeder Segregation 0 4357 783 18% 9581 2455 26%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 10050 28549 7953 28% 38599 18003 47%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 21300 0 0% 56000 0 0%
*UDAY Portal showing loss of Rs. 1981 Cr for FY 17 & profit of Rs. 2573 Cr for FY 18 instead of Loss of Rs. 4816 Cr for FY 17 and Rs. 2589 for FY 18. The69
factual position is also appraised to UDAY cell but the data correction is denied.
 Back
Tamil Nadu: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 14.4% 14.5% 14.2% 14.5% 13.8% 15.2%
Billing Efficiency % 85.6% 85.6% 86.6% 85.6% 86.9% 84.6%
Collection Efficiency % 99.8% 99.9% 99.1%   99.8% 99.1% 100.3%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.60 0.39 0.27 0.08 0.22 0.45
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (5787) (4349) (2975) (418) (1119) (2601)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.17 4.28 4.50 4.22 4.72 4.46
Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Overall %age
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18 achievement

DT Metering (Rural) 0 180748 0 0% 180748 0 0%

DT Metering (Urban) 48373 17700 1827 10% 66073 50200 76%
Feeder Segregation 0 960 0 0% 1920 0 0%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 1152000 0 0% 1552000 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 3456000 0 0% 8256000 0 0%
70
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Telangana: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 14.0% 15.9% 13.5% 15.7% 13.7% 13.4%
Billing Efficiency % 88.1% 88.4% 88.7% 88.9% 89.0% 88.6%
Collection Efficiency % 97.7% 95.2% 97.5%   94.8% 96.9% 97.7%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.69 1.24 0.55 0.87 0.11 0.85
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (1948) (6206) (6,330)* (2035) (3,165)** (2472)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 5.14 5.33 4.66 5.25 4.43 5.10

Operational Parameters

Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress

Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Overall %age
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 416660 20974 5% 418266 20974 5%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 518617 10101 2% 782894 10101 1%

71
Note: Data as per UDAY portal, * unaudited figures, ** estimated figures
 Back
Tripura: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 20.9% 16.6% 15.5% 24.1% 21.4% 19.3%
Billing Efficiency % 81.7% 84.4% 85.8% 82.5% 83.2% 81.4%
Collection Efficiency % 96.8% 98.8% 98.5%   91.9% 94.4% 99.1%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.24 0.02 0.08 0.09 -0.10 -0.19
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (57) (5) (25) 8 15 29.97
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 2.99 2.64 3.30 2.47 3.17 3.67
Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Overall %age
Data (April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 1966 10100 1708 17% 12066 3674 30%
DT Metering (Urban) 3058 0 0 0% 4688 3058 65%
Feeder Segregation 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 2000 110000 3510 3% 162000 5510 3%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 5000 110000 11490 10% 165000 16490 10%
72
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Uttar Pradesh: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 26.5% 30.2% 27.7% 38.1% 33.5% 33.1%
Billing Efficiency % 78.8% 78.9% 79.1% 77.1% 76.4% 79.2%
Collection Efficiency % 93.3% 88.4% 91.4%   80.3% 87.1% 84.5%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.88 0.62 0.28 0.40 0.54 0.48
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (7689) (6619) (3430) (2171) (3537) (3094)
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 4.45 4.32 3.97 4.15 3.93 4.48

Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress
Base year Target Achievemen Achievement in Overall No. Overall
Parameters Data Overall %age
(April’16- t (April’16- %age(April’16- to be achievement
achievement
Sept’18) Sept’18) Sept’18) achieved till Sept'18
DT Metering (Rural) 0 20315 20315 100% 506283 20315 4%
DT Metering (Urban) 87750 26396 26396 100% 164182 114146 70%
Feeder Segregation 0 1728 629 36% 5257 808 15%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 123976 0 0% 278722 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 93244 3200 3% 781220 3200 0%

73
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
 Back
Uttarakhand: Performance of outcome parameters
Parameters Unit FY16 FY17 FY18 H1FY17 HIFY18 H1FY19
AT&C Losses % 17.2% 14.0% 15.7% 33.2% 32.2% 27.8%
Billing Efficiency % 82.0% 83.3% 85.0% 79.5% 81.8% 81.6%
Collection Efficiency % 101.0% 103.2% 98.9%   83.9% 82.9% 88.5%
ACS-ARR Gap Rs./kWh 0.08 0.23 0.17 0.47 0.01 -0.02
Profit/Loss Rs. Cr. (95.93) (289) (229) (312) (9) 17
Power purchase cost Rs./kWh 3.37 3.57 3.94 3.92 3.29 3.89
Operational Parameters
Progress during UDAY period Overall Progress

Target Achieveme Achievement Overall Overall Overall

Parameters Base year Data nt in No. to achievem %age
(April’16
-Dec’18) (April’16- %age(April’16 be ent till achiev
Dec’18) -Dec’18) achieved Dec'18 ement
DT Metering (Rural) 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Feeder Segregation 0 44 11 25% 44 11 25%
Smart Metering (Above 500 kWh) 0 75000 0 0% 75000 0 0%
Smart Metering (200-500 kWh) 0 78750 0 0% 225000 0 0%

74
Note: Data as per UDAY portal
Annexure
 Back
GoI Imperative
 Phase I: GoI provides Equity Gap Funding of 1,800 Cr in the total equity of 2,800 Cr
(~13% of total Phase I capital structured in 80:20 Debt-Equity ratio).

 Phase I, II & III: GoI to support all MAPs (SPV for Year 1) with a ‘Risk Guarantee Fund’
• Covers 50% of defaults on all annuity payments for first 5 years
• SPV manages a DISCOM portfolio, to ensure <20% default risk.
• Non Lapsable fund,
 Envisaged GoI fund outlay:

(figures in Rs. Crore) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
GoI Support to Risk Guarantee
9 414 1,075 1,379 1,379 1,370 965 303
Fund
GoI Support to Equity Gap
1,800
Funding for SPV
Annual Outlay 1,809 414 1,075 1,379 1,379 1,370 965 303
Total Outlay 8,694 Crores
Energy balance for 2017-18
Energy Balance (2017-18)
(As per CEA) Calculated
Energy Balance
2015-16 2017-18
Gross Generation BU 1168 1308
Ex-bus energy availability BU 1091 1222
(-) Interstate Energy transaction by OA consumers from Exchange BU 20 15
(-) Sales by Distribution Franchisee and Private Licensee other than Delhi & Orissa BU 51 56
(-) Sales to ultimate consumer as effected by the Uts/Central Sector
Corporations/Govt Undertakings and Municipalities BU 30 33

Input Energy Available for sale in the States BU 990 1118

(-) Energy Input for Non-UDAY States and NE states where data has not been
uploaded on the UDAY Portal BU 88 99

Input Energy Available for sale in UDAY States BU 902 1019

(-) State Transmission Loss BU 35 40
Input Energy Available for sale in UDAY States at Discom Periphery BU 867 980
Total Energy Billed by UDAY States BU 693 824
T&D loss in FY18 15.9%
AT&C loss in FY18 (considering 96.9% collection efficiency ) 18.51%

Back
Loss Takeover
Borrowing Status and Loss takeover
Status of Bonds issued till date (Rs. In Crore)
Remaining Bonds to
S. No. State State Bonds Issued till date DISCOM Bonds issued till date
be issued by DISCOMs
1 Rajasthan 59,722 12,368 4,030
2 Uttar Pradesh 39,133 10,377 616
3 Tamil Nadu 22,815 0 7,605
4 Madhya Pradesh** 7,360 0 0
5 Haryana 25,951 0 8,566
6 Maharashtra** 4,960 0 1,653**
7 Punjab 15,629 0 4,633
8 Andhra Pradesh 8,256 0 6,465
9 Telangana 8,923 0 2,321
10 Jharkhand 6,136 0 0
11 Himachal Pradesh 2,891 0 963
12 Bihar 2,332 777* 0
13 Chhattisgarh 870 0 0
State has agreed to takeover DISCOM debt of Rs. 1132.53 Crs. No Bonds shall be issued as these are loans
14 Assam
from Government of Assam.
15 Meghalaya# 125 0 42
16 J&K**  3,538 0  0
Total 2,08,641 23,522 36,894
* Rs 777.26 crore loan was restructured through re-schedulement by Bank under UDAY Scheme.
** Under Discussion with respective state Government
# Meghalaya has decided to not issue remaining bonds
81
Source :Debt Info. Provided by the DISCOM
Debt conversion and Outstanding Loan trend
(Rs. In Crore)
DISCOM debt converted into
DISCOM debt to be Converted into Balance to be converted to
S. No. State Grant/Equity till date (State has
Grant/Equity by the end of FY19* Grant/Equity
taken full liability)
1 Rajasthan 60,398 32,700 27,698
2 Uttar Pradesh 39,908 34,242 5,666
3 Tamil Nadu 13,689 4,563 9,126
4 Madhya Pradesh 16,812 12,190 4,622
5 Haryana 20,760 15,571 5,189
6 Maharashtra 2,976 1,984 992
7 Punjab 0 0 0
8 AP 8,893 8,030 863
9 Telangana 8,923 7,723 1,200
10 Jharkhand 6,428 0 6,428
11 Himachal Pradesh 0 0 0
12 Bihar 2,332 2,332 0
13 Chhattisgarh 1,308 870 438
14 Assam 1,132.53 0 1,133
15 Meghalaya 125 125 0
16 J&K  3,538 3,538 0
Total 1,83,685 123,868 (67%) 59,817
At the end of FY18, DISCOM debt of Rs. 98,380 was converted into grant/equity against the target of Rs. 1,39,769 Cr (~70%)
with the balance debt of Rs. 41, 389 Cr. 82
*Source :As per UDAY MoUs
Loss takeover by States: Status as of FY17 & FY18 (1/3)
States which have not taken over FY17 losses in FY18 and have witnessed breakeven in FY18

Booked Provision Booked

Provision for
losses as for 5% losses as per
10% loss
State per UDAY loss UDAY Remarks
takeover
portal takeover portal
(FY19)
(FY17) (FY18) (FY18)

Rajasthan Finance department has not agreed to take over the losses. As
per accounts, profit for the year 2017-18 is Rs. 2172.71 cr instead of
Rajasthan (1,981) 99 2,573 Nil Rs. 2573 cr. This includes grant received from GoR of Rs. 12000 cr
agasint loan takenover under UDAY in FY 17-18. Operating loss
excluding the aforesaid grant is to the extent of Rs. 9827.29 cr.

Andhra State Government has agreed to take over 5% of the loss incurred
(2,331) 117 7.12 Nil
Pradesh during FY 2016-17 but so far has not been taken over.

As informed by the states, the actual booked loss as per ABS of FY

Maharashtra (3,348) 167 847 Nil
2016-17 is Rs.3347.58 Cr , the 5 % of which is 167 38 Cr

83
*As per audited accounts
Loss takeover by States: Status as of FY17 & FY18 (2/3)
States which have taken over FY17 losses in FY18, and not made provision this year

Booked Provision Booked Provision

losses as for 5% losses as per for 10%
State per UDAY loss UDAY loss Remarks
portal takeover portal takeover
(FY17) (FY18) (FY18) (FY19)
Bihar (1,419) 71 (3071)* 307 Loss has been taken over by State Govt. for FY 17 and 18.
State Govt. has released 5% of loss amount i.e. Rs. 141.81 cr. to PSPCL. PSPCL has
Punjab (2,836) 141 (907) 91 requested GOP to take over 10% loss of FY18. However, GOP has not released the
amount yet.
Loss for FY17 has been taken over by State Government vide GO.No.25
Tamil Nadu (4,349) 217 (7761)* 776.08 dt:23.03.2018.GoTN has been addressed to take over the 10 % loss of FY:2017-18
Rs.776.08 Cro. Vide TANGEDCO’s letter dated 19.12.2018.

Assam (157) Nil (401) 20*

As per MoU, 5% loss takeover started in FY19 and states have not taken over FY18
Madhya Pradesh (1,468) Nil (2,194) 109
losses in FY19
Meghalaya (409) Nil (317) 16*
State Government has released fund of Rs. 48.95 Crores as 5% of loss intimated to the
state government as per provisional accounts. As per provisional accounts of FY 2017-18
Chhattisgarh (788.12)* 49 (328) Nil
loss of Rs.328.00 Crores has been intimated to the state government against which fund
is yet to be released.

84
*As per audited accounts
Loss takeover by States: Status as of FY17 & FY18 (3/3)
States which have taken over FY17 losses in FY18 and FY18 losses in FY19
Booked Provision for Booked Provision for
losses as per 5% loss losses as per 10% loss
State Remarks
UDAY portal takeover UDAY portal takeover
(FY17) (FY18) (FY18) (FY19)
Budget provision to the tune of Rs. 10.25 Cr. has been made by
Haryana (193) 10 412 Nil
the State Govt. on account of loss takeover
Government of Himachal Pradesh has provided a sum of Rs.
Himachal
(44) 2 14 Nil 2.24 Cr for FY17. Further there is a profit in FY18 thus no
Pradesh
funding required under loss taken over.
Uttar State has given grant for both FY17 (Rs 409 cr) and FY18
(6,619) 331 (3,430) 343
Pradesh (Rs.502 cr) .
State has sanctioned to release 5% of loss of Rs. 310.44 Cr. and
Rs. 548.30 Cr. (Rs.516.30 Cr + Rs.32.23 Cr. ) towards loss
Telangana (6,208.72) 310.44 (5,485.29) 548.53 takeover of FY17 and FY 18 respectively. Rs.310.44 crore
released in FY 2017-18. Rs.548.53 crore for FY 2018-19 is not
yet released.
Government has made a provision of Rs. 200 Cr. for 5% loss
Jharkhand (1,741) 87 (212)* 21 takeover of FY17 and 10 % loss takeover of FY18. The fund of
INR 108.28 is yet to be received from State Government.
Being Govt. Department entire loss to be funded by state Govt.
J&K (3,368) 168 (3,174) 317
only.

85
*As per audited accounts