0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
287 vizualizări5 pagini
This document discusses the admission and pupillage requirements for lawyers in Malaysia. It begins by outlining the ordinary admission requirements, which include academic qualifications, practical experience requirements, and formal application procedures as set out in the Legal Profession Act. It provides several examples of relevant case law. The document then briefly discusses special admission under Section 18 of the LPA, which allows admission of foreign lawyers in special circumstances, and Sections 28A-28E, which grant the Attorney General power to issue certificates for special admission.
This document discusses the admission and pupillage requirements for lawyers in Malaysia. It begins by outlining the ordinary admission requirements, which include academic qualifications, practical experience requirements, and formal application procedures as set out in the Legal Profession Act. It provides several examples of relevant case law. The document then briefly discusses special admission under Section 18 of the LPA, which allows admission of foreign lawyers in special circumstances, and Sections 28A-28E, which grant the Attorney General power to issue certificates for special admission.
This document discusses the admission and pupillage requirements for lawyers in Malaysia. It begins by outlining the ordinary admission requirements, which include academic qualifications, practical experience requirements, and formal application procedures as set out in the Legal Profession Act. It provides several examples of relevant case law. The document then briefly discusses special admission under Section 18 of the LPA, which allows admission of foreign lawyers in special circumstances, and Sections 28A-28E, which grant the Attorney General power to issue certificates for special admission.
• To be eligible for admission, a candidate must satisfy all the requirements provided in the LPA which may be broadly categorised as follows: 1. Academic requirements – ss. 3, 10, 11 LPA • Badan Peguam Malaysia v Normah Mohd Yassin (1998) 1 AMR 100 • Shahinuddin bin Sharif v Mohd Amin bin Hasbollah (1998) 3 MLJ 693 • Bank Bumiputra (M) Bhd v Mohd Ibrahim bin Salleh (2000) 5 MLJ 778 • Badan Peguam Malaysia v Kerajaan Malaysia (2007) (FC) Civil Reference No. 06-1- 2007(W) • Rokiah bt M. Nor v Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri Koperasi & Kepenggunaan (2015) MLRH • All Malayan Estates Staff Union v Rajasegaran a/l V.N. Rajah & Ors (2004) MLJU 679 2. Practical requirements – ss. 11-17,28,36, 94(5) and 99 LPA • Re A Panjaram (1992) 1 MLJ 467 • OCBC (M) Sdn Bhd v CTK Enterprise Sdn Bhd (2000) 6 CLJ 158 • Akberdin Abdul Kader v Majlis Peguam [2001] 4 MLJ 381 • Majlis Peguam v Sunil Singh Gill (2004) 3 CLJ 16 • Samantha Murti v Attorney General Malaysia (1982) 2 MLJ 126 • Malaysian Bar v Mutang Tagal (1985) 1 MLJ 231 • Amirthayanaki Kumarasamy v Lembaga Kelayan Profesion Undang-Undang [2010] 1 MLJ 656 • Re Bar Council Malaysia (1989) 3 MLJ 386 • Re Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera (1991) 3 MLJ 386 • Ger-Mal Sdn Bhd v Zulkifli Hassan & Anor (2001) 6 CLJ 376 • Lim Chau Leng v Wong Chee Chong (2006) 2 MLJ 269 3. Formal Requirements – ss. 29-34, s.36-38 LPA • Badan Peguam Malaysia v Normah Mohd Yassin (1998) 1 AMR 100 • Shahinuddin bin Sharif v Mohd Amin bin Hasbollah (1998) 3 MLJ 693 • Bank Bumiputra (M) Bhd v Mohd Ibrahim bin Salleh (2000) 5 MLJ 778 • Badan Peguam Malaysia v Kerajaan Malaysia (2007) (FC) Civil Reference No. 06-1-2007(W) • Rokiah bt M. Nor v Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri Koperasi & Kepenggunaan (2015) MLRH • All Malayan Estates Staff Union v Rajasegaran a/l V.N. Rajah & Ors (2004) MLJU 679 • Zublin Muhibbah Joint Venture v Government of Malaysia (1990) 3 MLJ 125 • Irawadi bin Mohamad v Pendakwa Raya (2012) MLJU • Jaffari bin Waliam v Jeffery Aman & Ors (2013) MLJU 1074 • Mohamad Ramli bin Abdul Manan v Lim Chee Wee (Presiden Badan Peguam Malaysia) (2014) MLJU 513 • Diljit Kaur a/p Puran Singh v Majlis Peguam Malaysia (2015) 7 MLJ 695 TASK 2 (20%) Individual exercise Petition for admission with affidavit Please refer to “PRESCRIBED FORMS UNDER SECTION 15” (page 259 – 272 LPA) and also Section J of the KL Bar Committee Pupillage Handbook Also refer to https://www.klbar.org.my/pupilage/e-guide/ Deadline for submission : To be confirmed B. Special Admission 1. S. 18 LPA • Cherie Booth v AG Malaysia & Ors (2006) 2 CLJ 224 • Jude Philomen Benny v Majlis Peguam Malaysia (1997) 5 MLJ 306 • AG Geoffrey Robertson (2002) 2 MLJ 449 • Re S.K. Lee (1971) 2 MLJ 40 • Re B Larbalestier QC (1988) 1 MLJ 135 • Re Graham Starforth Hill (1971) 2 MLJ 269
2. ss. 28A – 28E LPA
• Attorney General’s power to issue Special Admission Certificates
Is Bad-Faith the New Wilful Blindness?: The Company Directors’ Duty of Good Faith and Wilful Blindness Doctrine Under Common Law Usa (Delaware) and Uk (England): a Comparative Study