PRESENTATION

ON
STUDY ON OGEE SPILLWAY: HYDRAULIC DESIGN AND
FLOW CHARACTERISTICS

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

Under Supervision of, Presented by,

MUDIT KHANDELWAL (121556)
DR. SUMIT GANDHI VIKRAM SINGH (121597)
SURYA PRATAP MEENA (121591)
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 Introduction
 Hydraulic Design

 Literature Review of Flow Characteristics

 Experimental Plan

 Result & Discussion

 Future Work

 References
OBJECTIVE
 To design an Ogee spillway
 To study the flow characteristics on the spillway by placing ogee spillway in
the flow channel and conduct experiments . Analyze and verify the obtained
data and results.
 INTRODUCTION OF SPILLWAY
Passages are constructed either within the dam or in the periphery of the reservoir
to safely pass the excess river during flood flows are called spillways.
OGEE SPILLWAY
The crest of the spillway is shaped to conform to the lower nappe of a water
sheet flowing over an aerated sharp crested weir.
FLOW CHARACTERISTICS

JUMP FORMATION IN OGEE SPILLWAY

 When water at high velocity discharges into a zone of lower velocity, a rather
abrupt rise occurs in the water surface.
 Initial kinetic energy converts into potential energy due which a sudden
increase in height of flow takes place. This is hydraulic jump.
 A hydraulic jump occurs when a supercritical flow (Fr >1 ) has to change
into subcritical flow (Fr <1).
HYDRAULIC JUMP
FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OGEE SPILLWAY
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF OGEE SPILLWAY

Ogee Profile equation –

Using this equation we found out crest profile of the spillway.

n
z æx ö
Where, = k. çH ÷
÷ , for x > 0
HD è D ø
HD= Design head (22cm)
X = Horizontal length of the spillway
Z = Vertical length of the spillway
K and n are coefficients.
 K and n depends on the slope of the upstream face.
Upstream face slope k n
Vertical 2.00 1.85
3 (v) on 1 (H) 1.936 1.836
3 on 2 1.939 1.810

3 on 3 1.873 1.776
GEOMETRICAL ELEMENTS OF SPILLWAY
 a = 0.175 Hd = 0.175 X 22 = 3.85 cm.
 R1 = 0.53 Hd = 0.5 X 22 = 11.67 cm.

 R2 = 0.235 Hd = 0.2 X 22 = 5.17 cm.

 b = 0.282 Hd = 0.287 X 22 = 6.204 cm.

b =distance from vertical face of spillway to the crest.

R1 = radius of the upstream profile of spillway
 The downstream profile was plotted using the equation
THE COORDINATES OBTAINED BY THIS EQUATION ARE AS FOLLOWS-

S.NO. X(HORIZENTAL DISTANCE FROM CREST IN CM) Y ( VERTICAL DISTANCE TILL CREST IN CM)
1 28.53193829 17.794
2 26.93911859 16
3 26.01553256 15
4 25.06319216 14
5 24.07904496 13
6 23.05944922 12
7 22 11
8 20.89528295 10
9 19.73851508 9
10 18.52100144 8
11 17.23127713 7
12 15.85367728 6
13 14.36578425 5
14 12.73343422 4
15 10.89961347 3
16 8.754404964 2
17 6.01876956 1
18 0 0
SIDE VIEW & ISOMETRIC VIEW OF MODEL
 Crest height = 17.794cm.
 Width = width of flow channel = 19.2cm.

 Height of vertical face of spillway = 15cm

SPILLWAY MODEL
LITERATURE REVIEW
FLOW OVER OGEE SPILLWAY
(By Bruce M. Savage1 and Michael C. Johnson)

 A studywas completed to compare flow parameters over a standard ogee-crested spillway using
a physical model, numerical model, and existing literature.

 Dimensions of physical model-

Design head (Hd) = 301 mm
Width = 1.83 m
Height =0.80 m
Design flow obtained = 0.376 m3/s
 Flume dimensions-The spillway model was placed in a flume.

Width = 1.83 m
Length = 12.0m
Depth = 1.22 m.
CONCLUSIONS – These models will be used for comparing results.
He /Hd = 0.07 to 1.20
Where, He - effective head upstream above the crest
 EXPERIMENTAL PLAN
Experiment on ogee spillway in open channel & measured various parameters-
Length of jump versus Froude number


Length of roller versus Froude number



Height of jump versus Froude number



PHASE 2 :
Study and Analysis of flow Characteristics using the experimental results.
Plotting of Required Graphs using the experimental results :
Q/Qd vs He/Hd
%Error vs He/Hd
Lr/Fr
Lj/Fr
Y2/Y1 vs Fr
Lj/Y2 vs Fr
EL/E1 vs Fr
EXPERIMENT ON HORIZONTAL RECTANGULAR
CHANNEL

 Initial depth before hydraulic jump (Y1)

 Final depth after hydraulic jump (Y2)

 Velocity at top of flow (V1)

 Velocity at bottom of flow (V2)

 Length of Jump (Lj)

 Length of Roller (Lr)

 Height of Jump (Hj)

EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS

INCLINED
MANOMETER

SLUICE GATE

OPEN CHANNEL
 GAUGE

SPILLWAY IN
PITOT TUBE CHANNEL
EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS WORK
 Vertical Gauge – Measured depth of flow
 Inclined Pitot Tube – Velocity measurement at any point

 Sluice Gate – Maintaining Discharge & for measuring parameter

 Valve – Flow of Water & Maintaining Discharge

OPEN CHANNEL DIMENSION

 Width of channel = 20cm

 Pipe Inner Diameter = 6.9cm

 Manometer Liquid = Water

 Specific Weight of Water = 9810 N/m^3

WATER FLOW OVER SPILLWAY MODEL
ROLLER FORMATION

Roller Formation
FLOW PARAMETER MEASURED DURING EXPRIMENT
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Observation data
result sheet.xlsx
Q/QD VS HE/HD
% ERROR IN DISCHARGE V/S HE/HD

% ERROR = (QD – Q ) X 100/ Q

HEIGHT OF JUMP VS FROUDE NO.
ENERGY LOSS VS FROUDE NUMBER
 CALCULATIONS FOR ENERGY LOSS
 Energy Loss Ratio = Energy Loss/E1
 Energy Loss = E1 - E2

 E1 = Y1

 E2 = Y2 + V1^2/(2g)
LENGTH OF JUMP VS FROUDE NO.
LENGTH OF ROLLER VS FROUDE NUMBER
LJ/Y2 VS FROUDE NO.
INTERPRETATION
 Q/Qd varies non-linearly Exponentially increasing with ratio of heads
( He/Hd)
 Height of jump (Y2/Y1) increases linearly with the froude number. At higher
froude number the height of jump is high.
 Energy loss ratio increases non linearly with froude number.

 Length of roller and length of jump increase logarithmically with froude

number.
CONCLUSION
 At higher heads the computed discharge comes to be high, this gives a direct
proportional relationship between the two and this can we verified from the
fact stated by the equation of proportionality and as per the research by
various authors .

 At higher Froude number (Fr1) a large amount of energy has to be dissipated

as a result Energy loss is high at higher Froude number.

 High amount of energy has to be dissipated at higher Froude number due to

which height of jump formed is also high as per the results obtained from our
analysis and authors result.

 Length of jump and roller formed at higher froude number is more due to
formation of intense jumps at higher froude number.
 FUTURE WORK
The future course of work has been divided as follows –

 January - February 2015: Literature review of experiments with baflle

blocks.
 March: Experiments with baffle blocks in flow channel.

 April 2015 : Analysis of result and plotting of graphs

 May – June 2015 : Comparison of results with authors and report

Compilation
 REFERENCES
BOOKS -
 “Flow Through Open Channels” by K.G Ranga Raju
 “Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulic Structures” by Santosh Kumar Garg.
 “ Open Channel Flow ” by Madan Mohan Das.

RESEARCH JOURNALS -
 Hydrodynamic modelling of flow over a spillway using a two-dimensional finite
volume-based numerical model by
(Mr Bhajantri, Ti Eldho & Pb Deolalikar)
 FLOW OVER OGEE SPILLWAY

(By Bruce M. Savage1 and Michael C. Johnson)

 Analysis of Flow Structure over Ogee-Spillway in Consideration of Scaleand
Roughness Effects by Using CFD
(Model by Dae Geun Kim and Jae Hyun Park)
THANK YOU