STUDENTS’ AWARENESS OF MISTAKE

IN HETEROGENEOUS PEER-
CORRECTION DESCRIPTIVE TEXT

by : Yohanes Dwi Ady Kurniawan

1623042015

MASTER IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING STUDY PROGRAM

LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
LAMPUNG UNIVERSITY
2020
Background of
Problem
 Background of Problem
Peer-Correction Students’
Writing in Awareness of
As one kind of
learning Mistake in
group discussion,
let students get Heterogeneous
Important in Peer-Correction
communicating correction from
partner. Descriptive Text
knowledge PC Feedback
Input in the form of
Writing Writing is difficult comment or
Important in literate Writing is complex correction from
society skill to be mastered. peers which can
increase
awareness.

Mawlawi
Chappel (2012) Kamariah (2018) Iuditm-Zsuzsi (2017) Moussaoui (2012) Researcher
(2009)
Walsh (2010) Hosseini (2013) Tilema (2012) Sapkota (2013)
Lee (2012)
Suleiman (2000) Thanh Huy (2015) Ramirez & Guillen (2018)
Currier (2018)
Research Questions 1
What mistakes do the learners make in
their writing through heterogeneous
peer-correction?

Research Questions 2
To what extent are learners or students
aware of mistake in heterogeneous peer
correction of descriptive?
Re s e a rc h
Questions
 Literature Review
Writing Feedback

Aspect of Writing Language Awareness

Descriptive Text Procedures

Peer-Correction
 Research Methodology
Validity of Data
Triangulation
Research Design
Qualitative Descriptive

Data Analysis

Data Collecting
• Task
• PC Guidance Sheet
• Interview

Population & Sample

• Class 9D of Xaverius 2 JHS Research Procedures
• 12 students • Determining material & Topic
• Creating Instrument
• Conducting writing activity
• Introducing the instrument
• Conducting the revision
• Interview
• Analyzing data & Interpreting result
•Concluding the research
 Finding
&
Discussion
 RQ 1: The mistakes that learners make in their writing
through heterogeneous peer-correction.

Mistakes

44% Organization
47% Content
Grammar
Vocabulary
Mechanic
9%

Finding
 RQ 2: The learners or students’ awareness of mistake in
heterogeneous peer-correction of descriptive text.

Students Awareness

35%
Willingness to
correct
53% Unwillingness to
correct
Unawareness
12%

Finding
 RQ 2: The learners or students’ awareness of mistake in
heterogeneous peer-correction of descriptive text.

No Students Unawareness Comprehensible Input (i+1)

Author Corrector
1 Feby Y. D. Albert C. 2 0
2 Aldo K. Neva Z. L. 9 0
3 Neva Z. L. Aldo K. 5 1
4 Laurenisus R. Stevany L. 16 7
5 Albert C. Feby Y. D. 0 0
6 Davin N. Edria T. H. 6 0
7 Edria T. H. Davin N. 6 0
8 Fernando W. Vicky G. 2 1
9 Stevany L. Laurenisus R. 15 0
10 Ignasius E. Sandy K. 18 18
11 Vicky G. Fernando W. 2 0
12 Sandy K. Ignasius E. 19 19
Total 100 46
Percentage 100% 46%

Finding
 RQ 1: The mistakes that learners make
in their writing through
heterogeneous peer-correction.

Mechanic
88 mistakes

Grammar
84 mistakes

Vocabulary
17

Jayanti (2019) : mechanic,

grammar & vocabulary
were fair to poor.

Discussion
 RQ 1: The mistakes that learners make
in their writing through
heterogeneous peer-correction.

Mechanic
88

Capitalization Spelling
59 13

Comparable
Discussion with Farah et al
(2016)
 RQ 1: The mistakes that learners make
in their writing through
heterogeneous peer-correction.

Grammar

dominant least
Degre Pro
SV Singular Use of Use
e
Adver Prep
agreement
of to comp
b of
freque PV nou ositi
-plural tense be arison ncy n on

Discussion
 RQ 1: The mistakes that learners make
in their writing through
heterogeneous peer-correction.

Vocabulary

Appropriate/
contextual meaning

Discussion
 RQ 2: The learners or students’ awareness of mistake in
heterogeneous peer-correction of descriptive text.
● There
InStudents’
linewere 46
with
Students’
input
awareness
for corrector
in
Ulrica
from
awareness of
responding
100 mistakes.
mistake
(2017) is average
mistake
(enough)is low

Aspect that
influencing the
finding of
research
(stuedents’
awaremess)

Discussion
Strengths of Heterogeneous Peer-Correction as
model developed by the researcher.

Heterogeneus Peer-Correction

Increasing: Creating
Providing Decreasing
cooperative &
useful mistake or collaborative
Critical thinking & Students’ awareness of Students’ confidence,
feedback. error.
awareness. Students’ role. mistake
learning.
independence.
Weaknesses of Heterogeneous Peer-Correction
as model developed by the researcher.

Heterogeneus Peer-Correction

Some students Students may be The different level of

Some students
Need much are lack of
feel ill equipped reluctant to make proficiency may
increase the anxiety
for doing the judgment to
time. confidence. HPC. peer.
from low level
learners.
Conclusions

• There were 3 category mistakes produced

by the learners. (Mechanic 47%, grammar
44% and vocabulary 9%.)
• The heterogeneous peer-correction that is
used in this research also made students’
participate actively by providing useful
feedback in the process of peer-correction.
Suggestions

English ●
The teacher have to support
the students to increase or
Teachers improve their awareness.

Further ●
Can try to find the students’ awareness in
responding feedback given.

Researc ●
Correlation between students’ awareness,
heterogeneous peer-correction and writing
achievement is still questionable.

her
Thank You