Purpose • Served as a notice to the offender of the matter accused , it must be clear and certain • Information to the court which is to try Particulars
• The particulars of the charge which are
important: – Time and place of the offence – Nature of the offence – Law against which the offence is alleged to have been committed Section 153 • Every charge shall contain time and place of the offence • Case: Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim – A charge that does not spesify a date is not necessarily defective. • See also the case of Hussin bin Silit and Sanusi Mat Karto where there is no spesific time but there is spesific place Person or Thing • Charge shall contain particulars of the person, or a thing relating to the offence committed. • The thing that involved in the offence also must be clearly spesified. • Case: Tan Ann Chye – The court could not find the scheduled drugs called mixed heroin Nature of the offence • The nature of the offence must be stated in the charge. • If : – It has spesific name, it shall be described by that name. e.g: rape – It has no spesific name, the definition is necessary to fulfill the purpose must be included. E.g: it is necessary to include those essentials elements. If the words are material to the charge, omission of it would render it defective. Common gaming house / public place. – It has no spesific name and definition is insufficient, the particulars of the manner which the offence was committed is necessary • Description to the offence – There are two types of averment: • A reference to the elements or ingredients of the statutory offence. E.g: extortion • Particulars which are not ingredients but it has details of the crime • Section 154 requires the charge to contain particulars of the manner, section 152 and 153 do not give special notice. • It deals with the nature of the act rather than the act itself. E.g: cheating : it has to explain the deception done • Case: Muthiah Pillay • Illustration (b) Law and section • Section 154(2) : law and section against which the offence is said to have committed shall be mentioned in the charge. • It has to be the substantive punishment section not the definition section. (Rogayah bte Che Mat) • When there is error in quoting the law if the offence required to prove is set out in the charge, it is a curable provided there is no miscarriage of justice. • However, quoting wrong punishable section would render the charge defective. (Pang Neng Tiong: attempted robbery should be charged under section 397 not section 393 to be read together with section 511)