COLLISION MITIGATION

SYSTEM

PRESENTED BY
GAUTHAM T
REG NO:17051166
 CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

RELEVANCE

METHODOLOGY

ADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGE
S

CONCLUSION

REFERENCE
 INTRODUCTION

The modern automobile companies are introducing new
technologies to make the driver and passengers safety

Some of the safety systems are ABS CBS CMBS etc...

Vehicle dynamic control system (VDCS) exist on most
modern vehicle play important role in vehicle ride
stability and safety

Aim of VDCS system in vehicle is to enhance vehicle
crash charactristics

Improve the response in case of vehicle to vehicle crash
scenario
 RELEVANC

E for Highway Safety, vehicles with
According to the Institute
collision avoidance systems are involved in fewer accidents and
injury-related car crashes.

This safety technology is proven to reduce serious car accidents,
injuries, and fatalities.
 METHODOLOGY


The vehicle frontal collision can be divided in to two primary
impact and secondary impact

In the system there are four shock absorber unit is provided in
bumber part of the vehicle to absorb the collision energy

During the sudden collision of the vehicle most of the primary
impact is absorbed by spring provided in the front body

Their by the secondary impact will be reduced and the occupent
will become effortless during the collision
 ADVANTAGE
S

The occupant in the vehicle much safer than other system
because of the 50-75% of primary impact will absobed by
the system

The ABS,CBC,CMBS, are co-stimulated system

The construction of the system structure is simple compared
to other system
 DISADVANTAGE

The system only can be used with the vehicle have
integrated body structure

It is very costly for installation

This system is only applicable for collision depended
accidents
 CONCLUSION
• The main reason for introducing collision mitigation system is
to increase overall safety

It serves as a reliable and efficienct system for efficient safety

This model presented here would be very useful early design stages
for accessing the crash worthiness performance of the vehicle and for
selecting appropriate vehicle parameters
 REFERENCE

Alleyne, A., 1997. Improved vehicle performance using
combinedsuspension and braking forces. Vehicle System Dynamics
27(4), 235e265.

Alleyne, A., Hedrick, J.K., 1995. Nonlinear adaptive control ofactive
suspensions. IEEE Transactions on Control SystemsTechnology 3 (1),
94e101.

Bang, M.S., Lee, S.H., Han, C.S., et al., 2001.
Performanceenhancement of a sliding mode wheel slip controller by
theyaw moment control. Proceedings of the Institution ofMechanical
Engineers Part D: Journal of AutomobileEngineering 215 (4),
455e468.

Celentano, G., Iervolino, R., Porreca, S., et al., 2003. 2003. Car
brakesystem modeling for longitudinal control design. In:
IEEEConference on Control Applications